Notebookcheck

Courte critique de la tablette Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 (i7-6567U, Iris 550, QHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)

Klaus Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 03/16/2019

Une planche à dessin avec Windows 10. La MobileStudio Pro est en partie une planche à dessin, en partie un PC Windows. Et même si Wacom a équipé l’appareil d’un processeur double cœur Skylake dépassé, cela vaut quand même le coup de voir comment cette tablette se défend en 2019.

Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR3-1600
Écran
13.3 pouces 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 221 PPP, multi-touch, Prise en charge native d'une utilisation avec un stylet, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disque dur
Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4, 256 Go 
Carte son
Realtek ALC286 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: carte SD, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, GPS, gyromètre
Réseau
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 16 x 367 x 229
Batterie
52 Wh Lithium-Polymère, 11,3 V
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 8 MPix
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo - 2x 1,7 W
Annoncées
11/05/2016
Poids
1.42 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

367 mm 229 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg349.3 mm 240.7 mm 15.5 mm 1.8 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg280.6 mm 214.9 mm 5.9 mm 633 g
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
157.2 MB/s ∼100% +111%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
74.7 MB/s ∼48% 0%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
  (oshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
74.5 MB/s ∼47%
Average of class Tablet
  (29 - 74.5, n=6)
57.1 MB/s ∼36% -23%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 664, max: 835) MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼73% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
590 (min: 549, max: 608) MBit/s ∼72% +1%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
586 (min: 571, max: 591) MBit/s ∼72%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
484 MBit/s ∼59% -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (33.4 - 664, n=55)
268 MBit/s ∼33% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
655 MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
643 (min: 596, max: 662) MBit/s ∼98% +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
602 (min: 543, max: 628) MBit/s ∼92% +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼85% +15%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 (min: 455, max: 506) MBit/s ∼74%
Average of class Tablet
  (37.6 - 643, n=55)
253 MBit/s ∼39% -48%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø586 (571-591)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø485 (455-506)
209
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
192
cd/m²
198
cd/m²
183
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 214 cd/m² Moyenne: 202.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.6 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 211 cd/m²
Contraste: 177:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 1.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.26
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
2560x1440, 13.3
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
2732x2048, 12.9
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Chi Mei (CMN1376), , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
-7%
-2%
-38%
5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.1 (20.2, 17.9)
49.6 (18.8, 30.8)
-30%
43 (21, 22)
-13%
47.2 (21.2, 26)
-24%
36 (18, 18)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
27.9 (14.7, 13.2)
23.2 (7.6, 15.6)
17%
25 (13, 12)
10%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
-52%
27 (13, 14)
3%
PWM Frequency
22000 (50)
25000 (40)
Screen
213%
139%
133%
117%
Brightness middle
211
632
200%
484
129%
474
125%
311
47%
Brightness
202
605
200%
473
134%
418
107%
278
38%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
91
6%
76
-12%
82
-5%
Black Level *
1.19
0.32
73%
0.33
72%
0.33
72%
0.2
83%
Contrast
177
1975
1016%
1467
729%
1436
711%
1555
779%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
1.1
78%
4.29
16%
3.2
37%
3.98
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19
2.4
87%
6.46
66%
6.1
68%
8.48
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
1.7
45%
4.3
-39%
4.5
-45%
5.57
-80%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.21 100%
2.51 88%
2.07 106%
2.51 88%
CCT
6606 98%
6794 96%
7315 89%
5881 111%
7810 83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.34
0.9
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
64
64
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
99.4
99
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
103% / 169%
69% / 111%
48% / 99%
61% / 95%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
27.9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14.7 ms hausse
↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38.1 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 20.2 ms hausse
↘ 17.9 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9618 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700Tooltip
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB Intel Core i7-6567U, Intel Core i7-6567U: Ø350 (342.14-354.57)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø448 (440.92-501.11)
HP ProBook x360 440 G1 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø508 (496.57-547.14)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼100% +12%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Core i7-6567U
145.18 Points ∼89%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
144 Points ∼88% -1%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-6567U
  (142 - 145, n=2)
144 Points ∼88% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (24 - 145, n=21)
63.7 Points ∼39% -56%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points ∼100% +96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼95% +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼92% +80%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
585 Points ∼84% +65%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
Intel Core i5-8250U
547 Points ∼79% +54%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
501 Points ∼72% +41%
Average Intel Core i7-6567U
  (355 - 364, n=2)
360 Points ∼52% +1%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Core i7-6567U
355 (min: 289.76, max: 355.19) Points ∼51%
Average of class Tablet
  (44 - 355, n=22)
155 Points ∼22% -56%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
9859
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12259
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5592
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
43.94 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.8 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
355 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
64.87 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.81 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145.18 Points
Aide
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
4875 Points ∼100% +9%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Iris Graphics 550, 6567U, Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4
4468 Points ∼92%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
4463 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-6567U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
  (4432 - 4468, n=2)
4450 Points ∼91% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼87% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼85% -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3970 Points ∼81% -11%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼73% -21%
Average of class Tablet
  (1008 - 4468, n=25)
1646 Points ∼34% -63%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Iris Graphics 550, 6567U, Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4
5177 Points ∼100%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
4998 Points ∼97% -3%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
4894 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4767 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-6567U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
  (4321 - 5177, n=2)
4749 Points ∼92% -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4454 Points ∼86% -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
4227 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Tablet
  (892 - 5177, n=21)
1504 Points ∼29% -71%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Iris Graphics 550, 6567U, Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4
4096 Points ∼100%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
3919 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-6567U, Intel Iris Graphics 550
  (3424 - 4096, n=2)
3760 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
3605 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼85% -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼80% -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3088 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Tablet
  (1018 - 4096, n=28)
1477 Points ∼36% -64%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4096 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5177 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4468 points
Aide
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Schenker Slim 14 M18
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
Average of class Tablet
 
AS SSD
-50%
-580%
11%
131%
272%
-136%
Score Total
988
1225
24%
455
-54%
1634
65%
2257
128%
3726
277%
871 (215 - 2103, n=17)
-12%
Score Write
266
280
5%
42
-84%
457
72%
794
198%
1590
498%
207 (53 - 372, n=17)
-22%
Score Read
474
644
36%
305
-36%
791
67%
1008
113%
1411
198%
445 (81 - 1176, n=17)
-6%
Access Time Write *
0.038
0.3
-689%
2.391
-6192%
0.224
-489%
0.032
16%
0.027
29%
0.4849 (0.031 - 4.46, n=21)
-1176%
Access Time Read *
0.123
0.213
-73%
0.044
64%
0.122
1%
0.041
67%
0.035
72%
0.2237 (0.04 - 0.74, n=21)
-82%
4K-64 Write
142.84
171.3
20%
2.09
-99%
298.32
109%
596.93
318%
1227.2
759%
110 (2.05 - 267, n=22)
-23%
4K-64 Read
381.48
494.14
30%
115.57
-70%
623.87
64%
740.67
94%
1120.82
194%
301 (6.49 - 1005, n=22)
-21%
4K Write
86.75
68.95
-21%
1.73
-98%
96.14
11%
112.23
29%
138.57
60%
40.2 (0.89 - 114, n=22)
-54%
4K Read
40.12
34.42
-14%
31.73
-21%
42.09
5%
42.48
6%
52.47
31%
23.8 (5 - 78.5, n=22)
-41%
Seq Write
361
393.6
9%
377.15
4%
624.85
73%
847
135%
2242.57
521%
219 (34.1 - 824, n=25)
-39%
Seq Read
519.1
1154.2
122%
1574.44
203%
1254.79
142%
2243
332%
2373.66
357%
420 (76.7 - 1331, n=24)
-19%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4
Sequential Read: 519.1MB/s
Sequential Write: 361MB/s
4K Read: 40.12MB/s
4K Write: 86.75MB/s
4K-64 Read: 381.48MB/s
4K-64 Write: 142.84MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.123ms
Access Time Write: 0.038ms
Score Read: 474Points
Score Write: 266Points
Score Total: 988Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8650U
5787 Points ∼100% +224%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
2383 Points ∼41% +33%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
1786 Points ∼31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1657 Points ∼29% -7%
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
1638 Points ∼28% -8%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1520 Points ∼26% -15%
Average Intel Iris Graphics 550
  (1025 - 1786, n=6)
1457 Points ∼25% -18%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1298 Points ∼22% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼21% -33%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1114 Points ∼19% -38%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1047 Points ∼18% -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
1025 Points ∼18% -43%
Average of class Tablet
  (90 - 1786, n=16)
527 Points ∼9% -70%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8650U
29376 Points ∼100% +105%
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
14310 Points ∼49%
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8565U
13776 Points ∼47% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
13172 Points ∼45% -8%
Sony Vaio Z Flip
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i7-6567U
12986 Points ∼44% -9%
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
12812 Points ∼44% -10%
Average Intel Iris Graphics 550
  (8885 - 14310, n=6)
12210 Points ∼42% -15%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
11093 Points ∼38% -22%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
10331 Points ∼35% -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼35% -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9769 Points ∼33% -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼31% -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U
8885 Points ∼30% -38%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
8600 Points ∼29% -40%
Average of class Tablet
  (636 - 14310, n=44)
2466 Points ∼8% -83%
3DMark 06 Standard
15910 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9099 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1665 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
646 points
Aide
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 30.322.719.1fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 81.346.828.224.7fps
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 22836.913.5fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 47.123.717fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
29.6 / 32.9 / 32.9 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
39.4 / 40.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 29.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.940.342.741.940.738.12531.231.929.530.231.231.4313130.528.927.329.730.24030.527.828.527.229.731.25028.327.931.328.628.230.86328.529.127.928.72928.38026.626.827.425.225.828.110025.52625.225.224.226.312525.124.424.124.423.72516025.324.323.723.622.124.920023.823.923.822.222.223.825024.223.623.521.521.623.83152423.923.321.320.823.640025.32622.722.319.725.750028.32723.32118.62863030.129.125.82218.429.880027.225.822.419.917.827.4100028.326.522.921.717.427.6125030.327.525.22417.530.4160031.43130.124.31731.6200034.731.731.121.917.134.4250030.331.227.719.416.729.8315027.425.421.518.316.927.3400024.422.520.118.316.724.3500021.620.318.117.416.821.5630018.917.917.417.116.818.880001817.817.617.51717.91000018.318.117.617.217.118.31250018.217.91817.41718.41600018.317.817.817.41718.2SPL40.939.437.532.929.640.7N3.22.92.41.71.33.2median 25.3median 24.4median 23.3median 21.3median 17.4median 25Delta3.332.22.723hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseWacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
A pleine charge
 25 °C35 °C39 °C 
 25 °C39 °C40 °C 
 32 °C35 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Moyenne: 34.4 °C
40 °C39 °C31 °C
25 °C38 °C33 °C
26 °C36 °C30 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Moyenne: 33.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  40 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini + TC3000
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.940.7412530.231.2313127.329.7294027.229.727.95028.628.229.56328.72928.68025.225.825.310025.224.224.812524.423.724.116023.622.122.920022.222.227.725021.521.635.431521.320.846.140022.319.747.55002118.651.26302218.44880019.917.852.3100021.717.462.812502417.572.2160024.31768.2200021.917.165.6250019.416.766315018.316.964.5400018.316.754.4500017.416.852630017.116.855.4800017.51750.61000017.217.148.11250017.41745.51600017.41735SPL32.929.676.5N1.71.329.6median 21.3median 17.4median 50.6Delta2.7213.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GBApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.5 / 0.9 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 10.3 / 13 / 15.1 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 54 / 63 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
6567U, Iris Graphics 550, Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Book 2
8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Average Intel Iris Graphics 550
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
43%
61%
50%
-4%
28%
76%
Idle Minimum *
10.3
3.2
69%
1.42
86%
3.2
69%
4.7
54%
5.87 (2.1 - 11.8, n=6)
43%
2.29 (0.4 - 13.6, n=315)
78%
Idle Average *
13
8.7
33%
9.35
28%
6
54%
10.6
18%
9.21 (6.5 - 14.2, n=6)
29%
4.55 (0.5 - 33.3, n=316)
65%
Idle Maximum *
15.1
10.4
31%
9.38
38%
9.2
39%
12.3
19%
10.3 (7 - 15.1, n=6)
32%
5.02 (0.6 - 34.6, n=316)
67%
Load Average *
54
29.2
46%
12.75
76%
29.5
45%
81
-50%
45.9 (27.6 - 56.4, n=6)
15%
8.3 (1.5 - 72.4, n=300)
85%
Load Maximum *
63
40.8
35%
14.96
76%
35.6
43%
100.3
-59%
48.6 (30.2 - 63, n=6)
23%
9.81 (2 - 70.3, n=307)
84%
Witcher 3 ultra *
97

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 08min
Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB
6567U, Iris Graphics 550, 52 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU, 36.71 Wh
Average of class Tablet
 
Autonomie de la batterie
171%
180%
323%
194%
Reader / Idle
1083
1888
1034 (251 - 3329, n=275)
WiFi v1.3
188
509
171%
527
180%
796
323%
552 (188 - 992, n=108)
194%
Load
131
166
184
243 (20 - 507, n=278)
H.264
1070
899
606 (180 - 1141, n=111)

Points positifs

+ excellente utilisation du stylet
+ touches et logiciels spécifiques pour les graphistes
+ châssis haute qualité
+ peut être utilisée comme écran ou tablette graphique externe

Points négatifs

- écran trop sombre
- fidélité des couleurs
- ventilateurs presque toujours en fonctionnement
- autonomie
- SoC dépassé
En test : le Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13.
En test : le Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13.

Autant la Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 nous a impressionnés pour sa prise en charge du stylet, autant elle nous a déçus dans presque tous les autres domaines. Le ventilateur tourne en permanence, et l’autonomie est décevante. De plus, l’écran est sombre, et la fidélité des couleurs est décevante pour un appareil professionnel.

La Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 gère très bien les stylets et sa polyvalence en tant qu’écran externe ou que planche à dessin est intéressante, mais elle est à la traîne pour tout le reste.

Ainsi Wacom équipe la tablette d’un processeur dépassé. Alors qu’il est malgré tout assez performant, c’est inacceptable que l’on continue à demander autant maintenant pour une tablette qui est objectivement sous-équipée par rapport à ses contemporaines. Cela dit, nous apprécions qu’il y ait trois ports USB C, et les boutons physiques sont utiles. En bref, la MobileStudio Pro 13 peut être utile en tant que tablette dédiée au dessin pour un graphiste, mais elle nécessite absolument une mise à jour.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB - 03/14/2019 v6
Klaus Hinum

Châssis
88%
Clavier
72 / 80 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
96%
Connectivité
64 / 65 → 99%
Poids
70 / 40-88 → 63%
Autonomie
70%
Écran
79%
Performances en jeu
70 / 68 → 100%
Performances dans les applications
89 / 76 → 100%
Chauffe
85%
Nuisance sonore
80%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Appareil photo
44 / 85 → 52%
Moyenne
73%
79%
Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique de la tablette Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 (i7-6567U, Iris 550, QHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)
Klaus Hinum, 2019-03-16 (Update: 2019-03-16)