Notebookcheck

Courte critique du HP Pavilion Gaming 17 (i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, FHD) : enfin un portable de jeu silencieux

Une Omen fin sans franfeluches. La série Pavilion n’est pas exactement la meilleure série de HP, et cependant le Pavilion Gaming 17 est l’un des meilleurs portables de jeu que nous ayons testé chez le fabricant. Le système est étonnamment silencieux, et même élégant vu son niveau de prix.
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1140 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 431.36, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, double canal, 2x SODIMM
Écran
17.30 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, BOE0825, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 Go 
, secondaire : disque dur WDC WD20SPZX 2 To
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: lecteur SD
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 25 x 405 x 282
Batterie
52.5 Wh Lithium-Polymère, 3 cellules
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: B&O, stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.76 kg, Alimentation: 678 g
Prix
1300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

423 mm 304 mm 33 mm 3.7 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg405 mm 282 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg399.8 mm 279.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 269 mm 29 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
Côté droit : combo audio 3,5 mm, 2 USB A 3.1 Gen. 1, entrée secteur.
Côté droit : combo audio 3,5 mm, 2 USB A 3.1 Gen. 1, entrée secteur.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
Côté gauche : HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (avec HP Sleep et Charge), Gigabit RJ-45, USB C 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbit/s, charge 3.0, DisplayPort 1.4), lecteur de carte SD.
Côté gauche : HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (avec HP Sleep et Charge), Gigabit RJ-45, USB C 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbit/s, charge 3.0, DisplayPort 1.4), lecteur de carte SD.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s ∼100% +136%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.59 MB/s ∼46% +9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
74.7 MB/s ∼42%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼15% -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.82 MB/s ∼100% +207%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.84 MB/s ∼41% +27%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
67.7 MB/s ∼33%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼13% -60%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼95%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼87% -9%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
215 (199min - 221max) MBit/s ∼31% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼97% +4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼87% -7%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
201 (89min - 272max) MBit/s ∼29% -69%
297.8
cd/m²
309.7
cd/m²
282.5
cd/m²
283.4
cd/m²
299.6
cd/m²
273.5
cd/m²
275.5
cd/m²
280.6
cd/m²
266.6
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
BOE0825
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309.7 cd/m² Moyenne: 285.5 cd/m² Minimum: 18.22 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 299.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 3.15
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
89.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
BOE0825, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Response Times
43%
47%
-42%
65%
65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.6 (14, 17.6)
15.6 (8, 7.6)
51%
17.6 (10, 7.6)
44%
41 (20, 21)
-30%
8 (4, 4)
75%
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
78%
Response Time Black / White *
19.6 (10.8, 8.8)
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
35%
10 (4.8, 5.2)
49%
30 (16, 14)
-53%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
55%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
51%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
Screen
-11%
5%
8%
22%
11%
Brightness middle
299.6
299.1
0%
343.6
15%
316
5%
420
40%
299.3
0%
Brightness
285
273
-4%
320
12%
294
3%
393
38%
294
3%
Brightness Distribution
86
81
-6%
87
1%
84
-2%
91
6%
94
9%
Black Level *
0.33
0.27
18%
0.34
-3%
0.32
3%
0.32
3%
0.29
12%
Contrast
908
1108
22%
1011
11%
988
9%
1313
45%
1032
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.68
5.07
-38%
3.74
-2%
3.39
8%
3.04
17%
2.55
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.05
10.55
-31%
5.33
34%
5.56
31%
7.22
10%
4.73
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.15
3.31
-5%
3.49
-11%
2.14
32%
0.89
72%
2.9
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
6.8
-79%
3.7
3%
3.17
17%
3.91
-3%
3.5
8%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.46 89%
2.36 93%
2.39 92%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
CCT
7240 90%
7805 83%
6388 102%
7098 92%
7138 91%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.1
58.5
1%
58
0%
51
-12%
60
3%
57
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.8
89.9
0%
90
0%
89
-1%
95
6%
88.7
-1%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
16% / -3%
26% / 12%
-17% / 1%
44% / 28%
38% / 19%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
19.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 10.8 ms hausse
↘ 8.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
31.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14 ms hausse
↘ 17.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9668 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1077 (1065.56-1205.55)
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1162 (1108.49-1274.58)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø970 (960.59-1110.2)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼75% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points ∼71%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼70% -1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
184 Points ∼68% -5%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
172 Points ∼63% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼63% -11%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points ∼61% -15%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
Intel Core i7-6820HK
159 Points ∼58% -18%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼57% -19%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
147 Points ∼54% -24%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼53% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼38% +47%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼33% +25%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points ∼28% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points ∼26% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1172 Points ∼26%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1047 Points ∼23% -11%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points ∼18% -31%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -31%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼17% -34%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
735 Points ∼16% -37%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼16% -37%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
501 Points ∼11% -57%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points ∼67%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼63%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼62%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼58%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.8 Points ∼57%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points ∼52%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼38%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points ∼26%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.88 Points ∼26%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points ∼19%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points ∼18%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼16%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.84 Points ∼16%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
34184 Points ∼52%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points ∼51%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
24623 Points ∼38%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
22781 Points ∼35%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points ∼34%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points ∼32%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points ∼69%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points ∼62%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
6561 Points ∼59%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
6539 Points ∼58%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
6524 Points ∼58%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points ∼53%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points ∼43%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.67 s * ∼3%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.075 s * ∼2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
 
154 s * ∼2%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
149.85 s * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
193 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1172 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130.69 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points ∼55% +30%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7530 Points ∼48% +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points ∼46% +11%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6640 Points ∼43% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6502 Points ∼42%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4110 Points ∼26% -37%
Productivity
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7679 Points ∼69% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points ∼67% +4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points ∼66% +3%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7241 Points ∼65% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7165 Points ∼64%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6619 Points ∼59% -8%
Essentials
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9832 Points ∼86% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points ∼84% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points ∼83% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9320 Points ∼81%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
9090 Points ∼79% -2%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8149 Points ∼71% -13%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼69% +11%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5939 Points ∼68% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼65% +6%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5440 Points ∼62% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5429 Points ∼62%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4339 Points ∼49% -20%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5968 Points ∼87% +14%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points ∼86% +13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼83% +9%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5636 Points ∼83% +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5222 Points ∼77%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4898 Points ∼72% -6%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5557 Points ∼90% +34%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points ∼82% +23%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4593 Points ∼74% +11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼71% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4148 Points ∼67%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Points ∼0% -100%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4148 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5222 points
PCMark 10 Score
5429 points
Aide
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Asus ROG GA502DU
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
AS SSD
8%
-35%
-30%
51%
Copy Game MB/s
1107.07
874.69
-21%
379.65
-66%
818.54
-26%
1042.83
-6%
Copy Program MB/s
588.74
481.13
-18%
114.05
-81%
496.94
-16%
452.13
-23%
Copy ISO MB/s
1284.28
1080.01
-16%
697.75
-46%
905.3
-30%
2030.84
58%
Score Total
2909
4142
42%
1869
-36%
1641
-44%
5529
90%
Score Write
1476
2147
45%
664
-55%
927
-37%
2590
75%
Score Read
951
1304
37%
803
-16%
459
-52%
1953
105%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.047
-38%
0.034
-0%
0.045
-32%
0.028
18%
Access Time Read *
0.073
0.071
3%
0.113
-55%
0.064
12%
0.031
58%
4K-64 Write
1232.96
1866.02
51%
436.61
-65%
735.67
-40%
2190.3
78%
4K-64 Read
730.81
1124.72
54%
611.97
-16%
321.47
-56%
1650.96
126%
4K Write
108.22
84.44
-22%
109.22
1%
98.74
-9%
134.74
25%
4K Read
49.73
31.66
-36%
36.54
-27%
47.26
-5%
27.86
-44%
Seq Write
1344.71
1962.09
46%
1181.67
-12%
926.26
-31%
2650.29
97%
Seq Read
1708.98
1472.55
-14%
1546.12
-10%
906.87
-47%
2738.85
60%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3184 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1428 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 644.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 567.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1617 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1337 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.67 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 135.3 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points ∼47% +75%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
8000 Points ∼42% +59%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6131 Points ∼33% +22%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6007 Points ∼32% +19%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points ∼30% +13%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5657 Points ∼30% +12%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
5043 Points ∼27%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points ∼26% -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4708 Points ∼25% -7%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
3510 Points ∼19% -30%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
3506 Points ∼19% -30%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2805 Points ∼15% -44%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8460 Points ∼48% +61%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7863 Points ∼45% +50%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6405 Points ∼37% +22%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5984 Points ∼34% +14%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5743 Points ∼33% +9%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5640 Points ∼32% +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
5245 Points ∼30%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4856 Points ∼28% -7%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4547 Points ∼26% -13%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
3559 Points ∼20% -32%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
3437 Points ∼20% -34%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2949 Points ∼17% -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points ∼46% +75%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
21138 Points ∼43% +60%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points ∼36% +35%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
16024 Points ∼32% +22%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15501 Points ∼31% +18%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15088 Points ∼30% +14%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14724 Points ∼30% +12%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points ∼27% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
13188 Points ∼27%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
10970 Points ∼22% -17%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9537 Points ∼19% -28%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
9274 Points ∼19% -30%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
135881 Points ∼67% +52%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
124764 Points ∼62% +39%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
115714 Points ∼57% +29%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
103428 Points ∼51% +16%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
101453 Points ∼50% +13%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
97729 Points ∼48% +9%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
91194 Points ∼45% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
89505 Points ∼44%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
79420 Points ∼39% -11%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
61392 Points ∼30% -31%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
44557 Points ∼22% -50%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
38016 Points ∼19% -58%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
13940 Points ∼58% +14%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
12512 Points ∼52% +3%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12441 Points ∼51% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
12175 Points ∼50%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points ∼50% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
12069 Points ∼50% -1%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points ∼47% -7%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9981 Points ∼41% -18%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9459 Points ∼39% -22%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
8788 Points ∼36% -28%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points ∼27% -45%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
6528 Points ∼27% -46%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points ∼53% +77%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
26752 Points ∼46% +53%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points ∼40% +34%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
22128 Points ∼38% +27%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20464 Points ∼35% +17%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20181 Points ∼34% +16%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
19187 Points ∼33% +10%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H
17457 Points ∼30%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points ∼29% -2%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
13871 Points ∼24% -21%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
13337 Points ∼23% -24%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12193 Points ∼21% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
16005 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35562 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11904 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5245 points
Aide
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
109 fps ∼100% +70%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
76.7 fps ∼70% +20%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
70 fps ∼64% +9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
64 fps ∼59%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
61 fps ∼56% -5%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼45% -23%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
45 fps ∼41% -30%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44 (9min) fps ∼40% -31%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
146 fps ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
135 fps ∼92% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
130 fps ∼89% +3%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
128 fps ∼88% +2%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
126.8 fps ∼87% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
126 fps ∼86%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
62 fps ∼42% -51%
0102030405060Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø47.1 (43-51)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 331.3 282 259.9 130 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 256.8 173.3 92.1 48.5 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 126 83 74 64 fps
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Noise
-6%
-11%
-6%
-24%
-15%
off / environment *
28.2
28.3
-0%
27.8
1%
30.8
-9%
29
-3%
28
1%
Idle Minimum *
30.1
31.5
-5%
31.1
-3%
30.8
-2%
29
4%
28
7%
Idle Average *
30.1
31.6
-5%
31.1
-3%
30.8
-2%
34
-13%
28.4
6%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
31.6
-5%
35
-16%
32.2
-7%
37
-23%
32.9
-9%
Load Average *
34.2
32.3
6%
42
-23%
38.6
-13%
53
-55%
45
-32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.2
43
-26%
44.5
-30%
51
-49%
53.2
-56%
Load Maximum *
43.8
45.5
-4%
46.5
-6%
44.8
-2%
55
-26%
53.2
-21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
34.2 / 43.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
 38.6 °C35.6 °C39.2 °C 
 28.4 °C42.6 °C36 °C 
 22 °C22 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Moyenne: 32.3 °C
37.4 °C49 °C37.2 °C
36.6 °C47.6 °C26.8 °C
27.6 °C24.6 °C24 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Moyenne: 34.5 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  50 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.544.5254341.93141.739.24042.739.85038.9386339.437.38038.637.810036.936.312536.936.516035.444.520035.149.125034.453.831533.656.840032.560.450032.462.663031.559.980031.455.9100030.656.1125030.362.616003062.4200029.458.2250029.263.1315028.959.6400028.764.4500028.567.6630028.361.7800028.262.7100002860.51250027.951.61600027.944.4SPL4274.3N4.634.5median 30.3median 59.6Delta2.66.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085clApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
<
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.013 / 0.7 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 5.4 / 9.2 / 13 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 85.9 / 182.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus ROG GA502DU
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-105%
-101%
-48%
-96%
-31%
Idle Minimum *
5.4
20.2
-274%
17.8
-230%
10
-85%
18.6
-244%
7.4
-37%
Idle Average *
9.2
27.2
-196%
24.7
-168%
15
-63%
22.6
-146%
8.6
7%
Idle Maximum *
13
28.7
-121%
29.6
-128%
22
-69%
23
-77%
39.1
-201%
Load Average *
85.9
90.8
-6%
110
-28%
92
-7%
93.4
-9%
65.9
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
107.9
152.1
-41%
167.8
-56%
153
-42%
186.4
-73%
106.9
1%
Load Maximum *
182.2
165.4
9%
178.6
2%
216
-19%
233.6
-28%
141.3
22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
11h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 39min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
0h 59min
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
-44%
-7%
55%
-46%
-10%
-37%
Reader / Idle
695
268
-61%
815
17%
286
-59%
295
-58%
251
-64%
WiFi v1.3
339
190
-44%
253
-25%
469
38%
190
-44%
280
-17%
120
-65%
Load
59
97
64%
124
110%
38
-36%
86
46%
69
17%

Points positifs

+ taille de l'adaptateur secteur 200 W
+ températures en jeu
+ niveau sonore pour un portable de jeu
+ deux emplacements SODIMM et deux emplacements de stockage
+ finesse pour un Pavilion

Points négatifs

- pas de Thunderbolt 3 ni de verrou Kensington
- basses
- clickpad
- maintenance
- rigidité de la partie écran
En test : le HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl.
En test : le HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl.

Un mot résume notre impression générale du Pavilion Gaming 17 : l’étonnement. La série Pavilion de HP constitue son offre bas de gamme, conçue pour les utilisateurs à petit budget, si bien que nous ajustons nos attentes en fonction. Ce modèle en particulier nous a pris par surprise, en étant l’un des portables de jeu les plus silencieux testés jusqu’à aujourd’hui, et également l’un des Pavilion les plus fins et les plus solides. HP commence à être clairement plus attentif à ses portables de jeu d’entrée de gamme, et le démontre avec le Pavilion Gaming 17.

Il y a toujours des éléments cheap qui pourraient être améliorés. Le clickpad étroit, la partie écran flexible, les haut-parleurs médiocres, et les grilles arrière fragiles donnent l’impression d’appartenir à un portable bien moins cher.

Notre plus grosse réserve ici est que le Pavilion Gaming 17 avec i9-9750H et GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q est plus cher que les systèmes avec des spécifications similaires. À 1 300 $, il n’est que de 100 à 200 $ moins cher que le MSI GL73, le MSI GP75, l’Asus TUF FX705, ou que l’Asus ROG GL731GU, en fonction de la RAM, du stockage et de l’écran. Mais le Pavilion reste néanmoins une bonne affaire, tout simplement grâce à son faible niveau sonore en jeu.

Un Pavilion qui se hisse au-dessus de la catégorie à bas coût. Non seulement il est plutôt silencieux pour un portable de jeu, mais sa construction solide élève la barre de ce que les futurs portables Pavilion pourront proposer.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl - 09/20/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Châssis
73 / 98 → 74%
Clavier
77%
Dispositif de pointage
75%
Connectivité
61 / 80 → 76%
Poids
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Autonomie
67 / 95 → 70%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
91%