Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)

Sascha Mölck (traduit par JBP), 03/28/2018

Très gourmand. L’Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC peut faire tourner tous les jeux fluidement sur son écran mat. Il est équipé d’un processeur huit cœurs Ryzen 5 1600, d’une carte graphique Radeon RX 580, et d’un disque hybride. Ce modèle d’entrée de gamme renonce au SSD.

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (GL702 Gamme)
Processeur
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Carte graphique
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop) - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1077 MHz, Mémoire: 2000 MHz, GDDR5, interface 256 bit, 23.20.15002.11 (Adrenalin 17.12.1), no Enduro
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR4-2 400, simple canal, 1 emplacement sur 2 occupé
Écran
17.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, FreeSync, 60 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
AMD B350
Disque dur
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, 1027 Go 
, 5400 tpm, 900 Go libres
Carte son
Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K17 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo écouteurs / microphone jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, TPM 2.0
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 34 x 415 x 280
Batterie
74 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, McAfee LiveSafe (version d'essai), MS Office 365 (version d'essai), 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
3.2 kg, Alimentation: 1.2 kg
Prix
1 249 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼99% +34%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼96% +31%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼96% +31%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
58 MB/s ∼73%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.3 MB/s ∼33% -55%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.6 MB/s ∼30% -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
91 MB/s ∼100%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s ∼92% -8%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.1 MB/s ∼30% -70%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.9 MB/s ∼22% -78%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
696 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
687 MBit/s ∼99% +9%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
649 MBit/s ∼93% +3%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
633 MBit/s ∼91% 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
632 MBit/s ∼91%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼64% -30%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
305 MBit/s ∼44% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
670 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
613 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
555 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
545 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
542 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
342 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
341
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 415 cd/m² Moyenne: 365 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 82 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 415 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.69 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
82% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.33
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GF72VR 7RF
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Helios 300
AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Nexoc G739
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w206ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-4%
39%
7%
3%
-24%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 (18, 18)
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
-9%
24.4 (15.2, 9.2)
32%
36 (18, 18)
-0%
29 (14, 15)
19%
45 (20, 25)
-25%
38 (20, 18)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
23 (14, 9)
22.8 (11.2, 11.6)
1%
12.6 (11.2, 1.4)
45%
20 (8.4, 11.6)
13%
26 (21, 5)
-13%
28 (7, 21)
-22%
26 (15.6, 10.4)
-13%
PWM Frequency
122000 (90)
25000 (20)
119000 (85)
961
450 (90)
200 (95)
Screen
9%
-13%
4%
-42%
11%
5%
Brightness middle
415
379
-9%
329.2
-21%
384
-7%
299
-28%
312
-25%
318
-23%
Brightness
365
354
-3%
318
-13%
373
2%
274
-25%
304
-17%
295
-19%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
92
12%
93
13%
80
-2%
85
4%
79
-4%
Black Level *
0.42
0.31
26%
0.4
5%
0.35
17%
0.25
40%
0.23
45%
0.25
40%
Contrast
988
1223
24%
823
-17%
1097
11%
1196
21%
1357
37%
1272
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.95
4.32
13%
6.4
-29%
4.81
3%
12.92
-161%
4.19
15%
4.7
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.34
8.56
8%
11.7
-25%
8.69
7%
19.91
-113%
8.7
7%
8.8
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.69
4
15%
9.2
-96%
5.33
-14%
13.16
-181%
3.72
21%
5
-7%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.47 97%
2.18 110%
2.45 98%
2.36 102%
2.29 105%
2.28 105%
CCT
6485 100%
6984 93%
10484 62%
7137 91%
15046 43%
7104 91%
7374 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
56
4%
76
41%
56
4%
60
11%
59
9%
61
13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
85
4%
92
12%
86
5%
94
15%
91
11%
93
13%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
3% / 7%
13% / -5%
6% / 5%
-20% / -35%
-7% / 5%
-3% / 3%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 54 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9953 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 588200) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
23 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14 ms hausse
↘ 9 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (26.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
36 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (42.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWInfo
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10652
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
25561
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4330
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
89.25 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.55 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Aide
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG U507 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
192 Points ∼33% +37%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼32% +36%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
178 Points ∼30% +27%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
167 Points ∼28% +19%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼27% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼27% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼27% +14%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼27% +14%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼26% +11%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
148 Points ∼25% +6%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼25% +4%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼24% +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
141 Points ∼24% +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
140 Points ∼24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼66% +25%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼62% +18%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1129 Points ∼53%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
941 (min: 921.89, max: 945.25) Points ∼44% -17%
Schenker XMG U507 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
919 Points ∼43% -19%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
857 Points ∼40% -24%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼35% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼35% -34%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼34% -35%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
731 Points ∼34% -35%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
729 Points ∼34% -35%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
708 Points ∼33% -37%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
515 Points ∼24% -54%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
511 Points ∼24% -55%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼98% +44%
Schenker XMG U507 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.18 Points ∼96% +41%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
2.02 Points ∼89% +30%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
1.9 Points ∼84% +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼81% +19%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼80% +17%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼80% +17%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼80% +17%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼80% +17%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼72% +5%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1.55 Points ∼68%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼66% +26%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼63% +20%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12.5 Points ∼52%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
10.99 Points ∼46% -12%
Schenker XMG U507 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
10.14 Points ∼42% -19%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
9.52 Points ∼40% -24%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.21 Points ∼34% -34%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼34% -35%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼34% -35%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points ∼34% -35%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points ∼34% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼84% +71%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7214 Points ∼81% +67%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
6371 Points ∼72% +47%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5952 Points ∼67% +37%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5874 Points ∼66% +36%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5525 Points ∼62% +28%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5502 Points ∼62% +27%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
4330 Points ∼49%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼48% -1%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
181 Points ∼2% -96%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79% +54%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
30921 Points ∼62% +21%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% +15%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
29209 Points ∼59% +14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
25561 Points ∼51%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22380 Points ∼45% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22143 Points ∼45% -13%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
18304 Points ∼37% -28%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
18296 Points ∼37% -28%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
988 Points ∼2% -96%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
23920 Points ∼77% +23%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
19391 Points ∼62%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14090 Points ∼45% -27%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
9752 Points ∼31% -50%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
9728 Points ∼31% -50%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3840 Points ∼82% +20%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
3343 Points ∼72% +5%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
3195 Points ∼69% 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
3195 Points ∼69% 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
3189 Points ∼68%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
19500 Points ∼71% +30%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
15037 Points ∼55%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14216 Points ∼52% -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
10525 Points ∼38% -30%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
8085 Points ∼29% -46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
4996 Points ∼87% +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4682 Points ∼81% +32%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4061 Points ∼70% +15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
3542 Points ∼61%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
3387 Points ∼59% -4%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
20500 Points ∼79% +26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
18457 Points ∼71% +14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
16235 Points ∼63%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
15111 Points ∼58% -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
11039 Points ∼43% -32%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
8081 Points ∼31% -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
Intel Core i5-8400
5104 Points ∼86% +41%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4808 Points ∼81% +33%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4159 Points ∼70% +15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
3884 Points ∼65% +8%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
3611 Points ∼61%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
3387 Points ∼57% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)
1054.2 ms * ∼2% -3%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0)
1025.2 ms * ∼2% -0%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)
1021.3 ms * ∼2%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
962.7 ms * ∼2% +6%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)
952.2 ms * ∼2% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)
929.6 ms * ∼2% +9%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
918.8 ms * ∼2% +10%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)
753.3 ms * ∼1% +26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)
48562 Points ∼98% +58%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
41110 Points ∼83% +34%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)
40592 Points ∼82% +32%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)
39373 Points ∼80% +28%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
36449 Points ∼74% +19%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)
32176 Points ∼65% +5%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)
30668 Points ∼62%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K (Edge 41.16299.15.0)
333 Points ∼100% +53%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 41)
275.96 Points ∼83% +26%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
268 Points ∼80% +23%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0)
263.52 Points ∼79% +21%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0)
259.75 Points ∼78% +19%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
253.52 Points ∼76% +16%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
250.74 Points ∼75% +15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ (Edge 40)
247.82 Points ∼74% +13%
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Intel Core i5-7300HQ (Edge 38)
247.51 Points ∼74% +13%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (Edge 15)
227.9 Points ∼68% +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Edge 41)
218.36 Points ∼65%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

PCMark 7 Score
5444 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4186 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5608 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4988 points
Aide
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4874 Points ∼82% +16%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼71% +2%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4216 Points ∼71% +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4186 Points ∼70%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
4173 Points ∼70% 0%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4002 Points ∼67% -4%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3220 Points ∼54% -23%
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Débit de transfert minimal: 36.8 MB/s
Débit de transfert maximal: 137.9 MB/s
Débit de transfert moyen: 104.3 MB/s
Temps d'accès: 18.9 ms
Débit en pointe: 183.5 MB/s
Utilisation du processeur: 1.2 %
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 17-w206ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
37802%
119%
50582%
47919%
Write 4k QD32
0.221
404.5
182932%
1.102
399%
544.4
246235%
504.7
228271%
Read 4k QD32
1.294
457.7
35271%
1.068
-17%
635.7
49027%
587.9
45333%
Write 4k
0.169
125.5
74160%
1.022
505%
154.5
91320%
155.6
91971%
Read 4k
0.484
34.29
6985%
0.582
20%
60.74
12450%
59.93
12282%
Write 512
101.8
425.9
318%
58.35
-43%
826.7
712%
805
691%
Read 512
37.67
579.6
1439%
45.57
21%
856.5
2174%
846.3
2147%
Write Seq
105.1
568.6
441%
127
21%
1192
1034%
1176
1019%
Read Seq
92.48
899.2
872%
135.3
46%
1666
1701%
1606
1637%
3DMark 06 Standard
28909 points
3DMark 11 Performance
12626 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28295 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9866 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3718 points
Aide
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
46773 Points ∼92% +208%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700
29615 Points ∼58% +95%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8600K
25604 Points ∼50% +69%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
18205 Points ∼36% +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
15607 Points ∼31% +3%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15264 Points ∼30% +1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
15182 Points ∼30%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14518 Points ∼28% -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12970 Points ∼25% -15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ
10270 Points ∼20% -32%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9482 Points ∼19% -38%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7769 Points ∼15% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i5-8400
8523 Points ∼80% +129%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4396 Points ∼41% +18%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3854 Points ∼36% +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
3718 Points ∼35%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
3696 Points ∼35% -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ
2407 Points ∼23% -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
26751 Points ∼100% +171%
Courte critique des processeurs Coffee Lake i7-8700K et i5-8400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), Intel Core i5-8400
19885 Points ∼74% +102%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700
16980 Points ∼63% +72%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8600K
15909 Points ∼59% +61%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11857 Points ∼44% +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
10144 Points ∼38% +3%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
10093 Points ∼38% +2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
9866 Points ∼37%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
9642 Points ∼36% -2%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9356 Points ∼35% -5%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8725 Points ∼33% -12%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ
6500 Points ∼24% -34%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5622 Points ∼21% -43%
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 7242.221.820.6fps
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 163.5102.681.354.1fps
GTA V (2015) 120.4115.583.439.6fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17312168.936fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 867776.369fps
World of Warships (2015) 135.111510195.9fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 98.695.465.525.7fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 826651.124.5fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 56.254.449.847.7fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 35.33029.2fps
Overwatch (2016) 276.3276191.196.2fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 55.945.935fps
Civilization VI (2016) 105.684.869.863.5fps
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 38.233.627.125.1fps
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 106.772.369.453.4fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 108105102101fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 242.9242.2218.1215.4fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 117856649fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 56.447.145.444.3fps
ELEX (2017) 117.18063.548.6fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 97.691.483.369.7fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 50444337fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 132.3128.86839.1fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 92.88678.575.6fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 6253.945.645.7fps
Fortnite (2018) 238.5183.180.659.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
92 fps ∼79% +88%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
69 fps ∼59% +41%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
62 fps ∼53% +27%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
53 fps ∼45% +8%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
49 fps ∼42%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46 fps ∼39% -6%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
184.3 fps ∼100% +167%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700
145 fps ∼79% +110%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
94.5 fps ∼51% +37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
90.3 fps ∼49% +31%
Saelic Vidi G771D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700
87.4 fps ∼47% +27%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
72.4 fps ∼39% +5%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
72.3 fps ∼39% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
71.7 (min: 62, max: 81) fps ∼39% +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
68.9 fps ∼37%
HP Omen 15t-ce000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
68.5 fps ∼37% -1%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
68 fps ∼37% -1%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 1700
67.4 (min: 58) fps ∼37% -2%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
67.1 fps ∼36% -3%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
50.4 fps ∼27% -27%
HP Omen 17-w206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
47.962 fps ∼26% -30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
47.4 fps ∼26% -31%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7300HQ
46.7 fps ∼25% -32%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36.3 fps ∼20% -47%
World of Warships - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
95.9 fps ∼58%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
85 fps ∼52% -11%
Need for Speed Payback - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
87.2 fps ∼65% +15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
75.6 fps ∼56%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
66.2 fps ∼49% -12%
Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 High / On AA:Filmic 1X SM
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
97.2 fps ∼56% +43%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
92.3 fps ∼53% +36%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
68 fps ∼39%
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
63.5 fps ∼59%
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
43 fps ∼40% -32%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-6300HQ
42.8 fps ∼40% -33%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
48.2 fps ∼43% +22%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
39.6 fps ∼35%
Hitman 2016 - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x
MSI GS73VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
57 fps ∼54% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
56 fps ∼53% +17%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
51 fps ∼48% +7%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
49.6 fps ∼47% +4%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
47.7 fps ∼45%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46 fps ∼44% -4%
Mafia 3 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
115 fps ∼100% +151%
Saelic Vidi G771D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700
94.7 fps ∼82% +106%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
48 fps ∼42% +5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
47.1 fps ∼41% +3%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
45.9 fps ∼40%
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
55 fps ∼35% +20%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
45.7 fps ∼29%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
300 fps ∼100% +212%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
103 fps ∼34% +7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
96.2 fps ∼32%
Destiny 2 - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8700K
113.1 fps ∼72% +62%
PC Zentrum Defiance IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
71.4 fps ∼45% +2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 1600
69.7 fps ∼44%

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB(A)
Disque dur
31.2 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
38.9 / 50.6 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.538.341.441.339.52539.835.636.437.839.83129.432.432.630.729.44030.632.430.231.530.65030.230.630.128.630.2633130.930.731.1318028.127.827.430.428.110028.729.326.53228.712527.331.124.525.827.316027.331.825.826.127.320027.233.225.824.927.225029.335.324.424.229.331528.236.1252328.24002734.623.321.82750025.232.723.321.225.263024.8322120.324.880027.5362419.527.5100030.84024.418.630.8125030.339.922.917.930.3160031.843.722.517.431.8200028.742.720.11728.7250024.941.11816.724.9315021.237.916.816.421.2400019.533.616.416.319.5500018.433.416.116.118.4630017.728.7161617.7800018.6261615.918.61000019.322.716.11619.31250019.820.4171619.81600020.319.416.516.120.3SPL38.950.732.730.238.9N2.96.81.81.42.9median 27Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204Tmedian 33.4median 22.5median 17.9median 27Delta3.83.743.73.8hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
 39 °C54.3 °C45.6 °C 
 26.6 °C48.4 °C36 °C 
 29 °C28.8 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 54.3 °C
Moyenne: 37.5 °C
51 °C43 °C47.5 °C
38.6 °C38 °C35.1 °C
27.4 °C30 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 51 °C
Moyenne: 37.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  42.8 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.241.345.22541.237.841.23144.930.744.94045.331.545.35047.628.647.66348.631.148.68052.330.452.310056.53256.512556.525.856.516057.226.157.22006024.96025063.824.263.831569.82369.840070.221.870.250067.221.267.263061.920.361.980061.119.561.1100059.518.659.5125057.117.957.1160056.417.456.4200056.71756.7250055.116.755.131505516.455400060.816.360.8500065.316.165.36300621662800056.515.956.5100005616561250054.51654.51600047.116.147.1SPL73.530.273.5N35.31.435.3median 57.2Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204Tmedian 17.9median 57.2Delta2.93.72.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 49 / 60 / 68 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 150 / 262 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 41)
1h 20min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP Omen 17-w206ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 62 Wh
380 min ∼23% +375%
Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 62 Wh
288 min ∼18% +260%
Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 48 Wh
279 min ∼17% +249%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 43.2 Wh
203 min ∼12% +154%
MSI GF72VR 7RF
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 43 Wh
142 min ∼9% +78%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
1700, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 76 Wh
90 min ∼6% +13%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
1600, Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 74 Wh
80 min ∼5%

Points positifs

+ écran lumineux et contrasté
+ Full HD
+ FreeSync
+ beaucoup d'espace de stockage
+ emplacement M.2 vide
+ CPU amovible
+ réserve de puissance multicœur

Points négatifs

- forte consommation au repos
- adaptateur secteur lourd
- mauvaise autonomie
- pas de Thunderbolt 3
- pas de SSD
- RAM difficile à changer
En test : l'Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par cyberport.
En test : l'Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par cyberport.

Le portable de jeu d’Asus fait tourner fluidement la plupart des jeux en Full HD, et avec des réglages graphiques élevés. Seuls quelques rares titres nécessitent de baisser la résolution et / ou les paramètres graphiques. La technologie FreeSync d’AMD permet une expérience fluide de jeu sur un écran 60 Hz. L’écran mat IPS séduit avec un contraste élevé, une bonne luminosité, et des angles de vision stables.

Le processeur hexacœurs intégré nous a fait une bonne impression.

Il permet une puissance de calcul plus que suffisante pour tous les logiciels modernes. Ses performances multicœurs sont meilleures que celles des concurrents Intel – il n’est battu que par le Core i7-8700K, qui n’est pas vraiment dans la même gamme puisqu'il s'agit d'une puce 95 watt qui coûte beaucoup plus cher. Le portable possède un stockage abondant. Asus l’a équipé d’un disque hybride de 1 To. Pour ne pas gonfler le prix, Asus a choisi de ne pas intégrer de SSD. Mais on peut en rajouter un après l’achat, un emplacement M.2 2280 étant disponible.

Le portable étant équipé d’un GPU dédié puissant, il consomme beaucoup, même au repos. De ce fait, ceux qui voudraient l’utiliser uniquement pour une utilisation quotidienne devraient rester à l’écart : le portable d’Asus manque d’un GPU dédié plus efficient. De plus, il est trop bruyant pour une utilisation bureautique.

Ce modèle d’entrée de gamme de la série GL702ZC coûte 1 200 €. En termes de prix, il est donc comparable aux portables équipés d’un processeur Intel Core et d’une carte graphique Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060. Ces appareils, généralement équipés à la fois d’une carte graphique dédiée et d’une intégrée peuvent être utilisés au bureau. Ils consomment moins et sont bien moins bruyants – on pense par exemple à l’Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G. De ce fait, le GL702ZC cible ceux qui veulent le plus de performances multicœur possibles pour un prix maîtrisé, et qui apprécient de pouvoir remplacer le CPU.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T - 02/02/2018 v6
Sascha Mölck

Châssis
79 / 98 → 81%
Clavier
75%
Dispositif de pointage
78%
Connectivité
64 / 81 → 79%
Poids
55 / 10-66 → 81%
Autonomie
50%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
93%
Performances dans les applications
88%
Chauffe
85 / 95 → 89%
Nuisance sonore
80 / 90 → 88%
Audio
80%
Appareil photo
42 / 85 → 49%
Moyenne
73%
83%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)
Sascha Mölck, 2018-03-28 (Update: 2018-03-28)