Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable de jeu MSI GF75 Thin 3RD (i7-8750H, GTX 1050Ti Max-Q, FHD)

Daniel Puschina, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 05/01/2019

Tout de finesse. "Faites-le fin et léger", voilà sans doute ce qu’ont entendu les ingénieurs de MSI quand on leur a demandé de créer le MSI GF75 8RD. Et le résultat est fin et léger. Mais comment ce poids léger se comporte-t-il en cas de grosses sollicitations - après tout, il n’est pas fait pour la bureautique mais s’adresse à la communauté des joueurs ? Peut-il répondre aux exigences élevées du jeu, ou le design a-t-il pris le pas sur les performances ?

MSI GF75 8RD-001
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1290 MHz, Mémoire: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, 25.21.14.1749
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4-2666
Écran
17.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, B173HAN04.2, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disque dur
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, 256 Go 
, 180 Go libres
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: jack audio
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless AC 9462 (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 23.1 x 397 x 260
Batterie
51 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD (30 FPS à 720p)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: haut-parleur 2 W, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.2 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

419 mm 287 mm 33 mm 2.7 kg413 mm 305 mm 21.95 mm 2.9 kg399.8 mm 279.4 mm 27.6 mm 2.6 kg397 mm 260 mm 23.1 mm 2.2 kg381.6 mm 262.8 mm 23.95 mm 2.4 kg378 mm 267 mm 27 mm 2.4 kg365 mm 256.5 mm 25.4 mm 2.4 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
689 MBit/s ∼100% +136%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless AC 9462
651 (min: 547, max: 681) MBit/s ∼94% +123%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼91% +116%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
624 (min: 509, max: 654) MBit/s ∼91% +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=217)
599 MBit/s ∼87% +105%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
566 (min: 424, max: 629) MBit/s ∼82% +94%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Wireless AC 9462
292 (min: 204, max: 344) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
655 (min: 646, max: 660) MBit/s ∼100% +107%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Wireless AC 9462
644 (min: 499, max: 661) MBit/s ∼98% +103%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
636 MBit/s ∼97% +101%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
584 (min: 511, max: 602) MBit/s ∼89% +84%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
579 MBit/s ∼88% +83%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=217)
546 MBit/s ∼83% +72%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Wireless AC 9462
317 (min: 274, max: 362) MBit/s ∼48%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø291 (204-344)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (274-362)
331
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 356 cd/m² Moyenne: 332.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 356 cd/m²
Contraste: 1319:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.73 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.38 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
MSI GF75 8RD-001
B173HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
LP173WF4-SPF6, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
AU Optronics B156HTN03.8 (AUO38ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
BOE07A1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-2%
9%
13%
-18%
11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (18, 20)
39 (21, 18)
-3%
36.8 (18.8, 18)
3%
44.8 (23.6, 21.2)
-18%
47 (23, 24)
-24%
35 (17, 18)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16, 12)
28 (16, 12)
-0%
24 (14, 10)
14%
16 (10, 6)
43%
31 (17, 14)
-11%
24 (14, 10)
14%
PWM Frequency
208 (90)
Screen
-9%
-47%
-124%
-36%
-55%
Brightness middle
356
299
-16%
328.7
-8%
200
-44%
241
-32%
280
-21%
Brightness
332
291
-12%
318
-4%
186
-44%
236
-29%
248
-25%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
91
2%
85
-4%
75
-16%
81
-9%
Black Level *
0.27
0.28
-4%
0.51
-89%
0.43
-59%
0.15
44%
0.56
-107%
Contrast
1319
1068
-19%
645
-51%
465
-65%
1607
22%
500
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.73
3.02
-11%
4.91
-80%
11.39
-317%
4.85
-78%
4.75
-74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.7
5.27
-12%
10.15
-116%
19.36
-312%
8.82
-88%
8.04
-71%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.14
2.76
-29%
4.27
-100%
3.05
-43%
4.93
-130%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.38
2.18
8%
3.9
-64%
11.73
-393%
5.15
-116%
3.21
-35%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.48 89%
2.13 103%
1.97 112%
2.49 88%
2.59 85%
CCT
6643 98%
6392 102%
6911 94%
12614 52%
7042 92%
6601 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
57
-3%
55.6
-6%
35
-41%
38
-36%
36
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
87
-3%
84.7
-6%
55
-39%
59
-34%
57
-37%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-6% / -8%
-19% / -39%
-56% / -103%
-27% / -33%
-22% / -45%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18 ms hausse
↘ 20 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9654 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel XTU
Intel XTU
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=82)
172 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=462)
154 Points ∼89% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
1220 Points ∼100% +12%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼91% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=89)
1108 Points ∼91% +2%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
1089 Points ∼89%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H
929.34 (min: 909.48, max: 1089.06) Points ∼76% -15%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
1077 Points ∼88% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1049 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=465)
788 Points ∼65% -28%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
MSI GF75 8RD-001 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (909.48-1089.06)
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1050 (994.7-1115.98)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (936-1116.11)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø988 (977.49-1049.42)
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1021 (1009.77-1077.38)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
92.06 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
929.34 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=154)
6177 Points ∼100% +41%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
5616 Points ∼91% +28%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5290 Points ∼86% +21%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5258 Points ∼85% +20%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5096 Points ∼82% +16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
5088 Points ∼82% +16%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5070 Points ∼82% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4377 - 5605, n=4)
4944 Points ∼80% +13%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4377 Points ∼71%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
4164 Points ∼67% -5%
Productivity
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
7332 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7252 Points ∼99% +8%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
7201 Points ∼98% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=155)
7080 Points ∼97% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
7057 Points ∼96% +5%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6830 Points ∼93% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (6671 - 7037, n=4)
6789 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
6739 Points ∼92% 0%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6724 Points ∼92%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
5694 Points ∼78% -15%
Essentials
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
9110 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
9065 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
8989 Points ∼99% +12%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
8530 Points ∼94% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (8057 - 9087, n=4)
8453 Points ∼93% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
8388 Points ∼92% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=156)
8229 Points ∼90% +2%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8186 Points ∼90% +2%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8057 Points ∼88%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
5849 Points ∼64% -27%
Score
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
5162 Points ∼100% +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=157)
5096 Points ∼99% +15%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4982 Points ∼97% +12%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4975 Points ∼96% +12%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4871 Points ∼94% +10%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4767 Points ∼92% +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
4732 Points ∼92% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4437 - 4966, n=4)
4706 Points ∼91% +6%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
4437 Points ∼86%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
3711 Points ∼72% -16%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
5461 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5396 Points ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5346 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5340 Points ∼98% 0%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5317 Points ∼97%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
5310 Points ∼97% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
5249 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=346)
4981 Points ∼91% -6%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
4609 Points ∼84% -13%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (4316 - 5317, n=4)
4608 Points ∼84% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
4259 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=364)
4245 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4235 Points ∼99% +7%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
4230 Points ∼99% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4148 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
4125 Points ∼97% +4%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4017 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3969 Points ∼93%
MSI GF63 8RC
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049
3704 Points ∼87% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (3494 - 3969, n=4)
3676 Points ∼86% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3969 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5317 points
Aide
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8
Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-13%
-39%
62%
-7%
37%
24%
Write 4K
72.11
90.26
25%
71.36
-1%
107
48%
59.22
-18%
103.4
43%
86.4 (72.1 - 114, n=3)
20%
Read 4K
28.12
37.03
32%
29.98
7%
39.91
42%
91.32
225%
55.97
99%
34 (28.1 - 40.6, n=3)
21%
Write Seq
746.4
320.3
-57%
129.6
-83%
1439
93%
158.3
-79%
808.2
8%
813 (746 - 849, n=3)
9%
Read Seq
833.8
1012
21%
842.6
1%
2011
141%
879.5
5%
1939
133%
978 (834 - 1137, n=3)
17%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.7
196.8
-37%
88.93
-72%
282.1
-10%
161.8
-48%
281.3
-10%
473 (236 - 868, n=3)
51%
Read 4K Q32T1
348.7
271.5
-22%
196.4
-44%
326.6
-6%
286.5
-18%
326.5
-6%
771 (349 - 1580, n=3)
121%
Write Seq Q32T1
854
268.8
-69%
130.5
-85%
1441
69%
159.8
-81%
474.1
-44%
689 (346 - 867, n=3)
-19%
Read Seq Q32T1
1587
1595
1%
1037
-35%
3516
122%
929.3
-41%
2735
72%
1195 (412 - 1587, n=3)
-25%
AS SSD
-56%
-147%
12%
-1524%
4%
-3%
Copy Game MB/s
478.72
229.24
-52%
134.55
-72%
81.65
-83%
647.92
35%
446 (381 - 479, n=3)
-7%
Copy Program MB/s
350.66
111.95
-68%
182.95
-48%
94.13
-73%
319.36
-9%
399 (315 - 532, n=3)
14%
Copy ISO MB/s
607.7
224.07
-63%
272.67
-55%
110.07
-82%
968.01
59%
772 (586 - 1121, n=3)
27%
Score Total
2112
764
-64%
479
-77%
1983
-6%
577
-73%
1883
-11%
2128 (2109 - 2163, n=3)
1%
Score Write
764
238
-69%
86
-89%
699
-9%
211
-72%
707
-7%
784 (764 - 799, n=3)
3%
Score Read
907
360
-60%
286
-68%
886
-2%
233
-74%
812
-10%
899 (869 - 921, n=3)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.044
0.054
-23%
0.324
-636%
0.037
16%
0.043
2%
0.099
-125%
0.0493 (0.044 - 0.059, n=3)
-12%
Access Time Read *
0.072
0.141
-96%
0.519
-621%
0.08
-11%
14.987
-20715%
0.058
19%
0.1063 (0.072 - 0.173, n=3)
-48%
4K-64 Write
584.11
112.49
-81%
31.38
-95%
459.83
-21%
137.26
-77%
470.71
-19%
613 (584 - 650, n=3)
5%
4K-64 Read
725.98
248.9
-66%
168.58
-77%
567.26
-22%
42.09
-94%
521.53
-28%
738 (726 - 748, n=3)
2%
4K Write
100.13
91.97
-8%
38.73
-61%
102.61
2%
59.54
-41%
112.4
12%
89 (67.1 - 100, n=3)
-11%
4K Read
38.92
23.76
-39%
19.73
-49%
46.14
19%
105.05
170%
41.22
6%
35.5 (25.4 - 42.2, n=3)
-9%
Seq Write
797.74
336.78
-58%
125.45
-84%
1365.1
71%
147.01
-82%
1241.15
56%
819 (798 - 836, n=3)
3%
Seq Read
1416.43
878.35
-38%
979.27
-31%
2723.52
92%
853.87
-40%
2493.03
76%
1256 (949 - 1416, n=3)
-11%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-35% / -41%
-93% / -108%
37% / 33%
-766% / -972%
21% / 16%
11% / 7%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1587 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 854 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 313.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 833.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 746.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 72.11 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=563)
12695 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
9466 Points ∼75% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
9079 Points ∼72% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8930 Points ∼70% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (8317 - 9079, n=7)
8781 Points ∼69% 0%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8741 Points ∼69%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
8624 Points ∼68% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
8619 Points ∼68% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
8304 Points ∼65% -5%
MSI GF63 8RC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
7611 Points ∼60% -13%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=487)
10846 Points ∼100% +48%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7860 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7791 Points ∼72% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7428 Points ∼68% +1%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7397 Points ∼68% +1%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7324 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (6957 - 7428, n=7)
7281 Points ∼67% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7199 Points ∼66% -2%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7192 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
6792 Points ∼63% -7%
MSI GF63 8RC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
6069 Points ∼56% -17%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=472)
64345 Points ∼100% +27%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
50801 Points ∼79%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
50732 Points ∼79% 0%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
49314 Points ∼77% -3%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
47895 Points ∼74% -6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
46618 Points ∼72% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (41871 - 50801, n=5)
46017 Points ∼72% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
41871 Points ∼65% -18%
MSI GF63 8RC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8300H
38928 Points ∼60% -23%
3DMark 11 Performance
9171 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28253 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6714 points
Aide
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
75.4 (min: 62) fps ∼100% +75%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 fps ∼97% +70%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
65.7 fps ∼87% +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=260)
47.5 fps ∼63% +10%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
43 (min: 39, max: 46) fps ∼57%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
29.7 fps ∼39% -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (23.5 - 43, n=7)
27.5 fps ∼36% -36%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
26 fps ∼34% -40%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
25.8 fps ∼34% -40%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
25.4 fps ∼34% -41%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
23.9 fps ∼32% -44%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
23.1 fps ∼31% -46%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
11.4 fps ∼15% -73%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
137 fps ∼100% +128%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
117.3 fps ∼86% +96%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=222)
81.6 fps ∼60% +36%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
60 (min: 54, max: 64) fps ∼44%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
51 fps ∼37% -15%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
50 fps ∼36% -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (42.6 - 60, n=6)
47.7 fps ∼35% -20%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
46.1 fps ∼34% -23%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
44.2 fps ∼32% -26%
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
42.9 fps ∼31% -28%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
40 fps ∼29% -33%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
20.4 fps ∼15% -66%
Far Cry New Dawn
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
42 fps ∼100% +180%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
36 fps ∼86% +140%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 42, n=4)
32.8 fps ∼78% +119%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
15 (min: 11, max: 19) fps ∼36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (14 - 15, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼35% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
14 fps ∼33% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
13 (min: 10) fps ∼31% -13%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
74 fps ∼100% +155%
Average of class Gaming
  (29 - 74, n=2)
51.5 fps ∼70% +78%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29 (min: 24, max: 37) fps ∼39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
 
29 fps ∼39% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
27 (min: 21) fps ∼36% -7%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
82 fps ∼100% +91%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
82 fps ∼100% +91%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
74 fps ∼90% +72%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 83, n=14)
62.2 fps ∼76% +45%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
43 (min: 33, max: 53) fps ∼52%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (40 - 43, n=2)
41.5 fps ∼51% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
40 fps ∼49% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
38 (min: 28) fps ∼46% -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
17 fps ∼21% -60%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
92 fps ∼100% +100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
92 fps ∼100% +100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
82 fps ∼89% +78%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 92, n=13)
68.4 fps ∼74% +49%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
46 (min: 38, max: 56) fps ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (43 - 46, n=2)
44.5 fps ∼48% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
43 fps ∼47% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
42 (min: 33) fps ∼46% -9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
18 fps ∼20% -61%
Metro Exodus
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
54.1 fps ∼100% +180%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
54 fps ∼100% +180%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
47.8 fps ∼88% +148%
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 76.1, n=11)
42.5 fps ∼79% +120%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
28.3 fps ∼52% +47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (19.3 - 28.3, n=2)
23.8 fps ∼44% +23%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
19.3 (min: 10.4, max: 19.3) fps ∼36%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
15.3 (min: 7) fps ∼28% -21%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
5.3 fps ∼10% -73%
1920x1080 High Quality AF:16x
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
66.4 fps ∼100% +183%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
66.4 fps ∼100% +183%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
58.2 fps ∼88% +148%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.1 - 91.5, n=12)
48.1 fps ∼72% +105%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
36.5 fps ∼55% +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (23.5 - 36.5, n=2)
30 fps ∼45% +28%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
23.5 (min: 12.1, max: 39.8) fps ∼35%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
18.5 (min: 9) fps ∼28% -21%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
6.8 fps ∼10% -71%
1920x1080 Medium Quality AF:4x
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
87.9 fps ∼100% +180%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
77.7 fps ∼88% +147%
Average of class Gaming
  (5.82 - 120, n=11)
55.1 fps ∼63% +75%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.8 fps ∼57% +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
  (31.4 - 49.8, n=2)
40.6 fps ∼46% +29%
MSI GF75 8RD-001
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
31.4 (min: 15.8, max: 53.7) fps ∼36%
MSI GE72 7RE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
23.7 (min: 11) fps ∼27% -25%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
7.3 fps ∼8% -77%
Lenovo V145-15AST
AMD A9-9425, AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
4.3 fps ∼5% -86%
Bas Moyen Élevé UltraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 145996043fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 75.137.725fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 895046432915fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 60.431.423.519.3fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
32 / 32 / 32.1 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
33.6 / 40.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.533.833.132.23432.5253432.832.932.834.1343136.733.933.632.733.736.7402931.93231.532.3295031.633.731.430.729.631.66329.12928.82827.529.18027.826.828.42724.627.810027.126.726.426.326.727.112526.526.22625.824.826.516025.924.724.924.624.525.920026.124.823.525.423.926.125023.723.723.822.922.623.731523.623.922.821.821.523.640022.82524.921.120.522.850024.328.223.52120.124.363022.827.325.120.919.122.88002329.426.521.318.523100024.728.125.120.518.524.712502430.627.722.517.724160022.631.528.82017.722.6200022.432.128.119.817.622.4250021.130.826.719.518.121.1315019.829.825.91918.419.8400019.526.222.918.818.319.55000192320.618.618.51963001921.919.918.718.719800019.119.619.1191919.1100001919.319.219.119191250019.119.419.319.119.119.11600019.419.319.419.419.219.4SPL33.940.637.532.230.833.9N1.83.22.51.51.31.8median 22.8median 26.2median 24.9median 20.5median 19median 22.8Delta2.532.41.91.52.531.434.435.132.831.432.531.432.129.432.53431.633.330.6343230.832.7303233.829.831.428.833.828.829.429.426.128.828.429.827.927.628.428.328.328.525.628.325.927.12624.825.926.429.723.923.926.426.728.923.922.426.727.731.323.621.727.730.735.424.721.230.729.735.221.620.229.729.730.924.719.429.727.332.619.918.927.329.234.221.817.729.231.936.62117.731.932.437.720.217.732.433.738.320.417.633.735.439.821.517.735.433.338.719.917.533.331.337.618.718.131.328.534.718.318.228.528.435.918.618.328.423.631.718.818.623.621.327.819.118.921.32024.119.1192020.42219.11920.420.92119.519.420.943.148.332.530.543.13.95.91.61.33.9median 28.4median 32.6median 20.4median 18.9median 28.42.73.91.91.82.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GF75 8RD-001Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
 41 °C44.2 °C43 °C 
 33.2 °C38.1 °C32 °C 
 26.3 °C25.4 °C26.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Moyenne: 34.4 °C
39 °C39.1 °C37.1 °C
26.4 °C32.7 °C28.1 °C
23.6 °C29 °C26.2 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Moyenne: 31.2 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  54 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 41.8 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.9 °C / 3.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.63431.62532.834.132.83134.933.734.94030.732.330.75034.429.634.46330.927.530.9802824.62810027.926.727.912525.624.825.61602524.52520026.423.926.42504022.64031546.621.546.64004920.5495004720.14763053.119.153.180066.818.566.8100064.818.564.8125058.217.758.2160054.617.754.6200051.117.651.1250054.318.154.3315053.918.453.9400052.118.352.1500056.818.556.8630047.918.747.9800047.11947.11000046.21946.21250049.219.149.21600051.219.251.2SPL7030.870N211.321median 49.2median 19median 49.2Delta5.91.55.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GF75 8RD-001Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GF75 8RD-001 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.38 / 0.6 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 6.5 / 11.9 / 13.1 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 86 / 131 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GF75 8RD-001
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
15%
4%
18%
7%
23%
4%
-100%
Idle Minimum *
6.5
3.8
42%
6.3
3%
4
38%
5.5
15%
3.9
40%
5.8 (2.1 - 9.48, n=7)
11%
19.8 (3.5 - 113, n=647)
-205%
Idle Average *
11.9
9
24%
11
8%
7
41%
8.5
29%
6.6
45%
11.2 (6.7 - 16.1, n=7)
6%
25.4 (6.8 - 119, n=647)
-113%
Idle Maximum *
13.1
11.2
15%
11.5
12%
11
16%
11.9
9%
8.5
35%
13.5 (9.8 - 17.6, n=7)
-3%
30.4 (8.3 - 122, n=647)
-132%
Load Average *
86
101
-17%
89.8
-4%
72
16%
94
-9%
89
-3%
86.9 (77.7 - 104, n=7)
-1%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=638)
-21%
Load Maximum *
131
119.7
9%
130.7
-0%
158
-21%
144
-10%
134
-2%
122 (92.4 - 134, n=7)
7%
169 (21.9 - 590, n=637)
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
102
79
86

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
6h 15min
En navigation internet via le module WiFi WLAN
0h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 41min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
3h 24min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 07min
MSI GF75 8RD-001
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 51 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 48.9 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Medion Erazer P6705-MD61131
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Autonomie de la batterie
70%
129%
53%
-36%
68%
5%
Reader / Idle
375
691
84%
1127
201%
736
96%
534
42%
338 (39 - 1174, n=627)
-10%
H.264
204
371
82%
459
125%
361
77%
248 (88 - 506, n=135)
22%
WiFi v1.3
281
384
37%
528
88%
383
36%
181
-36%
400
42%
253 (78 - 622, n=310)
-10%
Load
67
119
78%
135
101%
70
4%
147
119%
78.8 (18 - 202, n=593)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra
63
55 (50 - 66, n=4)

Points positifs

+ fin et léger
+ métal brossé au-dessus
+ disque dur et RAM extensibles
+ écran
+ refroidissement silencieux
+ repose-poignet frais
+ prix

Points négatifs

- sélection des ports
- absence de Thunderbolt
- placement du clavier
- coque inférieure en plastique
- son faible
- autonomie, batterie
- throttling
- pas de trappe de maintenance
En test : le MSI GF75 Thin. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le MSI GF75 Thin. Modèle de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

MSI a essayé de se concentrer sur l’essentiel, et a réussi à faire du GF75 une machine honnête. Il est assez puissant pour être considéré comme un portable de jeu, tout en proposant un châssis fin et léger. Même si la GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q économe en énergie avec une fréquence légèrement réduite ne parviendra pas à afficher les jeux actuels à des détails élevés, elle devrait permettre de jouer à la plupart des titres à des réglages moyens.

En revanche, MSI a choisi de réduire au minimum la sélection des ports, certainement pour atteindre ses objectifs de finesse, mais aussi pour garder le prix sous un certain palier.

Ceux qui peuvent supporter de travailler sans Thunderbolt ni DisplayPort, et qui n'ont pas besoin de lecteur de carte SD ni de fonctionnalités de sécurité comme un lecteur d’empreintes digitales, pourront être parfaitement convaincus par ce portable abordable qui inclut une GTX 1050 Max-Q.

L’écran IPS est très bon, et affronte la concurrence avec sérénité. Les résultats Cinebench ne sont pas aussi bons. Nous avons l’impression que le fabricant a été trop soucieux de maîtriser le bruit. Le ventilateur est très silencieux, et aurait pu tourner plus vite. La batterie pourrait également profiter d’une hausse de sa capacité. Alors que l’autonomie est suffisante pour un portable de jeu de 17 pouces toujours branché, les choses se compliqueront en déplacements.

Ainsi, nous pouvons dire que les joueurs du milieu de gamme jouant aux jeux actuels devraient être satisfaits du ratio prix / performances du MSI GF75 Thin. Et son aspect est très réussi. Il faudra cependant accepter des petits défauts comme une coque inférieure bon marché en plastique. Mais en les acceptant, on aura un appareil assez réactif et performant.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

MSI GF75 8RD-001 - 04/30/2019 v7
Daniel Puschina

Châssis
74 / 98 → 75%
Clavier
77%
Dispositif de pointage
75%
Connectivité
44 / 81 → 55%
Poids
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Autonomie
75%
Écran
89%
Performances en jeu
92%
Performances dans les applications
91%
Chauffe
93 / 95 → 98%
Nuisance sonore
89 / 90 → 98%
Audio
50%
Appareil photo
40 / 85 → 46%
Moyenne
73%
81%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable de jeu MSI GF75 Thin 3RD (i7-8750H, GTX 1050Ti Max-Q, FHD)
Daniel Puschina, 2019-05- 1 (Update: 2019-05- 1)