Notebookcheck

Courte critique du Wiko View 3 : smartphone abordable à l'autonomie exceptionnelle

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 07/31/2019

Autonomie XXL avec des compromis. D’après Wiko, le View 3 est le premier smartphone avec un triple capteur photo sous la barre des 200 €. Découvrez dans notre rapport de test du Wiko si la série View 3 championne de l’autonomie mérite une recommandation.

Wiko View 3 (View Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8320
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
6.26 pouces 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPP, capacitif multi-touch, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, , 52 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, boussole, gyroscope, accéléromètre, OTG, Miracast, LED de statut
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE : B1 (2 100)/ B3 (1 800)/ B5 (850) / B7 (2 600)/ B8 (900) / B20 (800) / B28B (700) / B40 (2 300), H+/3G+/3G HSPA+ : 850 / 900 / 1 900 / 2 100 MHz ; GSM / GPRS / EDGE: 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.2 x 159 x 76.5
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix 12 MP (pixels de 1,25 µm) + 2 MP (depth) + 13 MP (super grand-angle), API appareil photo : limitée
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, écouteurs, câble micro USB, adaptateur secteur modulaire, Wiko UI, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,248 W/Kg, corps: 1,089 W/Kg, LTE Categorie 4 DL 150 Mbit/s, UL 50 Mbit/s, fanless
Poids
178 g, Alimentation: 56 g
Prix
180 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Comparaison des tailles

159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g159 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 178 g158.92 mm 76.91 mm 8.1 mm 168 g157.1 mm 75.8 mm 8.1 mm 153 g154 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 156 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100% +400%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=463)
230 MBit/s ∼66% +229%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼37% +83%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 (min: 42, max: 55) MBit/s ∼15% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼100% +333%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=463)
218 MBit/s ∼92% +296%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼43% +85%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼20% -13%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36.5 (min: 21, max: 43) MBit/s ∼15% -34%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼15% -36%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
GPS Wiko View 3
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
Wiko View 3 smartphone
530
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 574 cd/m² Moyenne: 552.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 574 cd/m²
Contraste: 3021:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Huawei Y7 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
2%
2%
-21%
-24%
11%
Brightness middle
574
541
-6%
464
-19%
445
-22%
547
-5%
533
-7%
Brightness
552
540
-2%
452
-18%
424
-23%
543
-2%
533
-3%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
92
1%
91
0%
94
3%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.19
0.33
-74%
0.28
-47%
0.26
-37%
0.49
-158%
0.25
-32%
Contrast
3021
1639
-46%
1657
-45%
1712
-43%
1116
-63%
2132
-29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
2.7
51%
2.8
49%
5.9
-7%
4.5
18%
2.8
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
4.6
52%
6.1
36%
9.3
2%
7.9
17%
5.1
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
3.1
38%
2
60%
6.8
-36%
5
-0%
1.9
62%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
2.33 94%
2.2 100%
2.35 94%
2.11 104%
CCT
7610 85%
6853 95%
6611 98%
8443 77%
7400 88%
6149 106%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9331 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
16.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 10.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 31.2 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3015 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼100% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2744 Points ∼49% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2940 Points ∼53% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2166 - 3015, n=6)
2664 Points ∼48% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼84% +55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3655 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼100% +62%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3526 Points ∼60% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼55% -11%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3870 Points ∼65% +6%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3300 - 3660, n=7)
3468 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼80% +29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
749 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼100% +119%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
827 Points ∼50% +10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼54% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
761 Points ∼46% +2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (749 - 824, n=7)
778 Points ∼47% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼87% +91%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼100% +20%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
4558 Points ∼74% -11%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼75% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4499 Points ∼73% -12%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼79% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=9)
4644 Points ∼75% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=399)
5379 Points ∼87% +5%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼99% -1%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
6861 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5431 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=9)
5891 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=566)
5844 Points ∼85% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1136 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼54%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1779 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1183, n=8)
992 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=407)
2009 Points ∼73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼69%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
376 Points ∼21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
414 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 449, n=8)
420 Points ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=407)
1832 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼84%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
442 Points ∼26%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼29%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
499 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 521, n=8)
481 Points ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=408)
1701 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼100% +184%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1144 Points ∼41% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼55% +55%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1765 Points ∼64% +81%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼36% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=9)
987 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=436)
1917 Points ∼69% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼82% +344%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
629 Points ∼26% +39%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼29% +58%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
715 Points ∼29% +58%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼27% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 740, n=9)
665 Points ∼27% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=436)
2441 Points ∼100% +440%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +304%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
699 Points ∼34% +36%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼39% +57%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼40% +61%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼34% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 808, n=9)
715 Points ∼34% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=436)
2049 Points ∼99% +299%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1108 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1707 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1130, n=8)
971 Points ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=487)
1913 Points ∼71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼78%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
297 Points ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
367 Points ∼24%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼25%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 392, n=8)
328 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=487)
1517 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼93%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
355 Points ∼24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼30%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 459, n=8)
385 Points ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=488)
1460 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100% +201%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1101 Points ∼39% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼55% +66%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼62% +87%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼36% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=9)
979 Points ∼35% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=528)
1775 Points ∼63% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼97% +420%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
466 Points ∼23% +26%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼35% +90%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
704 Points ∼35% +90%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼31% +69%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 645, n=9)
523 Points ∼26% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=527)
1990 Points ∼100% +438%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +384%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
535 Points ∼26% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼39% +87%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼39% +90%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼33% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 714, n=9)
582 Points ∼28% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=530)
1716 Points ∼83% +301%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14036 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼100% +36%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
12578 Points ∼66% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼65% -12%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13655 Points ∼72% -3%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼61% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15069, n=9)
11940 Points ∼63% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=687)
14357 Points ∼75% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10689 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼100% +176%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
9603 Points ∼33% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼46% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12281 Points ∼42% +15%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼34% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 11349, n=9)
10461 Points ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=685)
22559 Points ∼76% +111%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11287 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼100% +133%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10136 Points ∼39% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼50% +17%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12562 Points ∼48% +11%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼39% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11921, n=9)
10713 Points ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=685)
18200 Points ∼69% +61%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +155%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
18 fps ∼35% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼45% +15%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼43% +10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (17 - 20, n=8)
19 fps ∼37% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=706)
38.7 fps ∼76% +94%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼100% +63%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
25 fps ∼57% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼77% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼75% +22%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (24 - 27, n=8)
26 fps ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=715)
28.4 fps ∼65% +5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +130%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
8.6 fps ∼37% -14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% -2%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼40% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9.1 - 10, n=8)
9.64 fps ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=611)
22.4 fps ∼97% +124%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼100% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
15 fps ∼75% -12%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼90% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (15 - 17, n=8)
16.5 fps ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=620)
19.7 fps ∼99% +16%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼82% +142%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.7 fps ∼31% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼35% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼33% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.6 - 6.2, n=8)
5.85 fps ∼32% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=476)
18.3 fps ∼100% +195%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼76% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
10 fps ∼58% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼76% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼76% +18%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 11, n=8)
10.6 fps ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=478)
17.1 fps ∼100% +55%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼47% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.6 fps ∼35% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% -9%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼36% -14%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=8)
4.25 fps ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=199)
10.3 fps ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼45% +100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1.1 fps ∼15% -31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼15% -31%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=8)
1.388 fps ∼20% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=198)
7.11 fps ∼100% +344%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼50% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
5.8 fps ∼38% -15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼40% -10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=8)
6.78 fps ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=203)
15.1 fps ∼100% +122%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼51% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.2 fps ∼19% -32%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼21% -23%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼20% -28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=8)
3.78 fps ∼22% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=203)
16.9 fps ∼100% +260%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼73% +214%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2.6 fps ∼21% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼28% +21%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼27% +17%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2.1 - 2.9, n=8)
2.68 fps ∼22% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=401)
12.4 fps ∼100% +328%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼70% +66%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
3.8 fps ∼34% -19%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼63% +49%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.8 fps ∼61% +45%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.8 - 5.1, n=8)
4.44 fps ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=405)
11.1 fps ∼100% +136%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
76398 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼100% +88%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
72796 Points ∼51% -5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
73468 Points ∼51% -4%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼54% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (71347 - 88242, n=9)
76135 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143005 Points ∼100% +87%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼100% +54%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
765 Points ∼70% +9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼77% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
835 Points ∼77% +19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼71% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 835, n=8)
578 Points ∼53% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=644)
766 Points ∼71% +9%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼100% +189%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
678 Points ∼29% -15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼43% +25%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
964 Points ∼42% +21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼33% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (744 - 799, n=8)
769 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=644)
2125 Points ∼92% +166%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼100% +129%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
790 Points ∼34% -22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼56% +29%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1377 Points ∼59% +35%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼53% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (661 - 1247, n=8)
928 Points ∼40% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=644)
1563 Points ∼67% +53%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼100% +96%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
2707 Points ∼53% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼52% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2879 Points ∼56% +10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼49% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2165 - 2619, n=8)
2343 Points ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=644)
3048 Points ∼59% +16%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼100% +112%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072
1026 Points ∼44% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼56% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1337 Points ∼57% +21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (323 - 1166, n=8)
896 Points ∼38% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=644)
1531 Points ∼65% +38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115)
36.4 Points ∼100% +181%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼44% +23%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
14.694 Points ∼40% +14%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
14.579 Points ∼40% +13%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼38% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3)
13.5 Points ∼37% +4%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
12.933 Points ∼36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼100% +160%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=702)
6930 Points ∼65% +68%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼45% +17%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼41% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9)
4166 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
4115 Points ∼39% 0%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼39%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
4018 Points ∼38% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9)
11753 ms * ∼100% -0%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)
11697.7 ms * ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼95% +5%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
11012.1 ms * ∼94% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=727)
10440 ms * ∼89% +11%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼83% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼34% +66%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Wiko View 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 7ZTE Blade V10 VitaNokia 4.2Huawei Y7 2019Sony Xperia L3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
30%
-22%
-37%
21%
-1%
31%
14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=106)
-9%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=438)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=106)
-6%
67.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=438)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
8.98
16.06
79%
9.99
11%
4.31
-52%
17.48
95%
16.36
82%
24.8 (3.4 - 125, n=118)
176%
23.4 (0.14 - 259, n=763)
161%
Random Read 4KB
55.23
82.94
50%
20.32
-63%
17.51
-68%
83.53
51%
28.83
-48%
55 (11.4 - 149, n=118)
0%
48.7 (1.59 - 226, n=763)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
132.39
204.72
55%
119.45
-10%
18.17
-86%
88.77
-33%
87.52
-34%
171 (40 - 246, n=118)
29%
99.6 (2.99 - 590, n=763)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.32
283.36
-1%
95.57
-67%
220.39
-23%
305.05
6%
290.89
1%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=118)
-5%
281 (12.1 - 1781, n=763)
-2%
 29.7 °C30 °C28.8 °C 
 29.7 °C29.8 °C29.6 °C 
 29.1 °C29.1 °C30.1 °C 
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Moyenne: 29.5 °C
28 °C28.7 °C29.6 °C
28.5 °C28.8 °C29.8 °C
28 °C28.2 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 29.8 °C
Moyenne: 28.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.235.32531.230.93127.227.34023.729.6503139.66322.728.18022.830.910024.42112520.923.216020.337.520019.141.525016.4473151650.740017.658.850015.26063014.661.980015.471.3100014.875.2125015.276.1160015.675.9200014.878.2250014.678.6315014.379.6400014.678.3500014.770.9630015.373.8800015.369.81000014.966.11250015.354.91600015.639SPL27.387.8N0.967.3median 15.3median 66.1Delta1.215.236.635.428.224.524.6242124.42834.727.226.825.422.223.621.519.223.92040.816.449.71756.616.560.415.665.214.37012.869.71470.314.67314.276.81476.914.179.514.479.414.277.414.675.514.173.114.666.914.767.715.17314.968.4155726.687.60.869median 14.6median 69.71.69hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseWiko View 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Wiko View 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.73 / 1.79 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.18 / 3.43 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-35%
-21%
-10%
-4%
-17%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.61
9%
0.69
-3%
0.74
-10%
0.51
24%
0.57
15%
0.711 (0.57 - 1, n=9)
-6%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=792)
-32%
Idle Average *
1.73
1.95
-13%
2.03
-17%
1.9
-10%
1.7
2%
1.5
13%
1.589 (1 - 2.4, n=9)
8%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=791)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.79
2.03
-13%
2.06
-15%
2.21
-23%
1.85
-3%
1.51
16%
1.982 (1.51 - 2.9, n=9)
-11%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=792)
-13%
Load Average *
2.18
4.56
-109%
3.55
-63%
3.04
-39%
3.17
-45%
3.09
-42%
3.05 (2.18 - 4, n=9)
-40%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=786)
-87%
Load Maximum *
3.43
9.15
-167%
6.15
-79%
4.15
-21%
4.44
-29%
4.15
-21%
4.65 (3.43 - 5.9, n=9)
-36%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=786)
-73%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 35min
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
3200 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
995
768
-23%
644
-35%
696
-30%
1113
12%
641
-36%

Points positifs

+ écran IPS lumineux
+ autonomie
+ précision du GPS
+ design
+ appareils photo
+ chauffe

Points négatifs

- haut-parleur
- résolution 720p
- Widevine L3
- SoC

Verdict

En test : le Wiko View 3. Modèle de test fourni par Wiko Allemagne.
En test : le Wiko View 3. Modèle de test fourni par Wiko Allemagne.

Wiko a bien fait les choses avec son smartphone View 3 d’entrée de gamme. Malgré son prix contenu, le design est moderne, les bordures d’écran plutôt fines, et les finitions satisfaisantes. De plus, il propose de bons appareils photo qui se sont avérés en partie étonnamment bons, ainsi qu’une très bonne autonomie et que des composants utiles telles une LED de notification et une prise jack 3,5 mm.

Ceux qui recherchent un smartphone abordable avec un design moderne et une bonne autonomie, mais qui sont prêts à accepter des compromis, devraient être satisfaits du Wiko View 3.

Mais le smartphone possède également des défauts visibles au quotidien. Alors que l’on pourra supporter les mauvais haut-parleurs et la faible résolution de la dalle IPS autrement réussie – même si la série Redmi de Xiaomi possède des écrans 1080p dans cette gamme de prix à moins de 200 € - il sera plus difficile de se contenter des faibles performances du Helio P22. Avec un tel compromis qu’un écran 720p en 2019, les utilisateurs devraient pouvoir espérer de meilleures performances au quotidien, d’autant plus que le View 3 possède une version d’Android Vanilla presque pas modifiée. Nous avons réduit légèrement notre notation des performances à cause de cela.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Wiko View 3 - 07/27/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
83%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
88%
Connectivité
36 / 60 → 60%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
100%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
22 / 63 → 35%
Performances dans les applications
36 / 70 → 51%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Appareil photo
52%
Moyenne
70%
81%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du Wiko View 3 : smartphone abordable à l'autonomie exceptionnelle
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-07-31 (Update: 2019-07-31)