Courte critique du Wiko View 3 : smartphone abordable à l'autonomie exceptionnelle
Autonomie XXL avec des compromis. D’après Wiko, le View 3 est le premier smartphone avec un triple capteur photo sous la barre des 200 €. Découvrez dans notre rapport de test du Wiko si la série View 3 championne de l’autonomie mérite une recommandation.
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix
Comparaison des tailles
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=463) | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=463) | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 |
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 574 cd/m²
Contraste: 3021:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Wiko View 3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3 | ZTE Blade V10 Vita TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26 | Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71 | Huawei Y7 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 2% | 2% | -21% | -24% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 574 | 541 -6% | 464 -19% | 445 -22% | 547 -5% | 533 -7% |
Brightness | 552 | 540 -2% | 452 -18% | 424 -23% | 543 -2% | 533 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 92 1% | 91 0% | 94 3% | 89 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.33 -74% | 0.28 -47% | 0.26 -37% | 0.49 -158% | 0.25 -32% |
Contrast | 3021 | 1639 -46% | 1657 -45% | 1712 -43% | 1116 -63% | 2132 -29% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.5 | 2.7 51% | 2.8 49% | 5.9 -7% | 4.5 18% | 2.8 49% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.5 | 4.6 52% | 6.1 36% | 9.3 2% | 7.9 17% | 5.1 46% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5 | 3.1 38% | 2 60% | 6.8 -36% | 5 -0% | 1.9 62% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 7610 85% | 6853 95% | 6611 98% | 8443 77% | 7400 88% | 6149 106% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9331 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
16.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 6 ms hausse | |
↘ 10.8 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 31.2 ms hausse | |
↘ 18 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2166 - 3015, n=6) | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=328) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3300 - 3660, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=387) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (749 - 824, n=7) | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=387) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5237, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=399) | |
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 6922, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=566) |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (912 - 1183, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5576, n=407) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (376 - 449, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8374, n=407) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (435 - 521, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 6916, n=408) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (900 - 1195, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5133, n=436) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (452 - 740, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=436) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (513 - 808, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10427, n=436) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (860 - 1130, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4909, n=487) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (257 - 392, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 7150, n=487) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (305 - 459, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6319, n=488) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (854 - 1139, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4900, n=528) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (370 - 645, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11302, n=527) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (428 - 714, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8338, n=530) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9674 - 15069, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=687) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9536 - 11349, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=685) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9835 - 11921, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=685) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (17 - 20, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=706) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (24 - 27, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=715) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9.1 - 10, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=611) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (15 - 17, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=620) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.6 - 6.2, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=476) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 11, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=478) |
GFXBench | |
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.3, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=199) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 33, n=198) | |
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.7 - 6.8, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=203) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 87, n=203) | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2.1 - 2.9, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=401) | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.8 - 5.1, n=8) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=405) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs) | |
Wiko View 3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Huawei Y7 2019 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (71347 - 88242, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=296) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=115) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.9, n=3) | |
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=702) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75) | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9) | |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90) | |
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=727) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Wiko View 3 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | ZTE Blade V10 Vita | Nokia 4.2 | Huawei Y7 2019 | Sony Xperia L3 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 30% | -22% | -37% | 21% | -1% | 31% | 14% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6% | 61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4% | 65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4% | 65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3% | 61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3% | 57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=106) -9% | 49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=438) -22% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6% | 86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6% | 80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=106) -6% | 67.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=438) -17% |
Random Write 4KB | 8.98 | 16.06 79% | 9.99 11% | 4.31 -52% | 17.48 95% | 16.36 82% | 24.8 (3.4 - 125, n=118) 176% | 23.4 (0.14 - 259, n=763) 161% |
Random Read 4KB | 55.23 | 82.94 50% | 20.32 -63% | 17.51 -68% | 83.53 51% | 28.83 -48% | 55 (11.4 - 149, n=118) 0% | 48.7 (1.59 - 226, n=763) -12% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 132.39 | 204.72 55% | 119.45 -10% | 18.17 -86% | 88.77 -33% | 87.52 -34% | 171 (40 - 246, n=118) 29% | 99.6 (2.99 - 590, n=763) -25% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 287.32 | 283.36 -1% | 95.57 -67% | 220.39 -23% | 305.05 6% | 290.89 1% | 273 (95.6 - 704, n=118) -5% | 281 (12.1 - 1781, n=763) -2% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Wiko View 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wiko View 3 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 3200 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -59% | -35% | -21% | -10% | -4% | -17% | -41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.61 9% | 0.69 -3% | 0.74 -10% | 0.51 24% | 0.57 15% | 0.711 (0.57 - 1, n=9) -6% | 0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=792) -32% |
Idle Average * | 1.73 | 1.95 -13% | 2.03 -17% | 1.9 -10% | 1.7 2% | 1.5 13% | 1.589 (1 - 2.4, n=9) 8% | 1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=791) -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.79 | 2.03 -13% | 2.06 -15% | 2.21 -23% | 1.85 -3% | 1.51 16% | 1.982 (1.51 - 2.9, n=9) -11% | 2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=792) -13% |
Load Average * | 2.18 | 4.56 -109% | 3.55 -63% | 3.04 -39% | 3.17 -45% | 3.09 -42% | 3.05 (2.18 - 4, n=9) -40% | 4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=786) -87% |
Load Maximum * | 3.43 | 9.15 -167% | 6.15 -79% | 4.15 -21% | 4.44 -29% | 4.15 -21% | 4.65 (3.43 - 5.9, n=9) -36% | 5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=786) -73% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Wiko View 3 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 3200 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomie de la batterie | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 995 | 768 -23% | 644 -35% | 696 -30% | 1113 12% | 641 -36% |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Verdict
Wiko a bien fait les choses avec son smartphone View 3 d’entrée de gamme. Malgré son prix contenu, le design est moderne, les bordures d’écran plutôt fines, et les finitions satisfaisantes. De plus, il propose de bons appareils photo qui se sont avérés en partie étonnamment bons, ainsi qu’une très bonne autonomie et que des composants utiles telles une LED de notification et une prise jack 3,5 mm.
Ceux qui recherchent un smartphone abordable avec un design moderne et une bonne autonomie, mais qui sont prêts à accepter des compromis, devraient être satisfaits du Wiko View 3.
Mais le smartphone possède également des défauts visibles au quotidien. Alors que l’on pourra supporter les mauvais haut-parleurs et la faible résolution de la dalle IPS autrement réussie – même si la série Redmi de Xiaomi possède des écrans 1080p dans cette gamme de prix à moins de 200 € - il sera plus difficile de se contenter des faibles performances du Helio P22. Avec un tel compromis qu’un écran 720p en 2019, les utilisateurs devraient pouvoir espérer de meilleures performances au quotidien, d’autant plus que le View 3 possède une version d’Android Vanilla presque pas modifiée. Nous avons réduit légèrement notre notation des performances à cause de cela.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Wiko View 3 - 07/27/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich