Courte critique du Wiko View 3 : smartphone abordable à l'autonomie exceptionnelle

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 07/31/2019

Autonomie XXL avec des compromis. D’après Wiko, le View 3 est le premier smartphone avec un triple capteur photo sous la barre des 200 €. Découvrez dans notre rapport de test du Wiko si la série View 3 championne de l’autonomie mérite une recommandation.

Exemplaire de test fourni par Wiko Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Wiko View 3 (View Gamme)

Processeur

Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762

Carte graphique

PowerVR GE8320

Mémoire

3072 Mo

Écran

6.26 pouces 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPP, capacitif multi-touch, IPS, brillant: oui

Disque dur

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go

, 52 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, boussole, gyroscope, accéléromètre, OTG, Miracast, LED de statut

Réseau

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE : B1 (2 100)/ B3 (1 800)/ B5 (850) / B7 (2 600)/ B8 (900) / B20 (800) / B28B (700) / B40 (2 300), H+/3G+/3G HSPA+ : 850 / 900 / 1 900 / 2 100 MHz ; GSM / GPRS / EDGE: 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.2 x 159 x 76.5

Batterie

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix 12 MP (pixels de 1,25 µm) + 2 MP (depth) + 13 MP (super grand-angle), API appareil photo : limitée
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, écouteurs, câble micro USB, adaptateur secteur modulaire, Wiko UI, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,248 W/Kg, corps: 1,089 W/Kg, LTE Categorie 4 DL 150 Mbit/s, UL 50 Mbit/s, fanless

Poids

178 g, Alimentation: 56 g

Prix

180 euros

Liens

Wiko Page d'accueil

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100% +400%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=417)	223 MBit/s ∼64% +219%
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼37% +83%
Wiko View 3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼20%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019 Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼15% -25%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	51.3 (min: 42, max: 55) MBit/s ∼15% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼100% +333%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=417)	213 MBit/s ∼89% +287%
Sony Xperia L3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼43% +85%
Wiko View 3 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼23%
Huawei Y7 2019 Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼20% -13%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 64 GB eMMC Flash	36.5 (min: 21, max: 43) MBit/s ∼15% -34%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼15% -36%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.3 (57-83)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55 (47-62)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images


530 cd/m²	571 cd/m²	552 cd/m²
550 cd/m²	574 cd/m²	550 cd/m²
523 cd/m²	564 cd/m²	557 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 574 cd/m² Moyenne: 552.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 574 cd/m²
Contraste: 3021:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Wiko View 3 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3	ZTE Blade V10 Vita TFT-LCD, 1520x720, 6.26	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71	Huawei Y7 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26	Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen		2%	2%	-21%	-24%	11%
Brightness middle	574	541 -6%	464 -19%	445 -22%	547 -5%	533 -7%
Brightness	552	540 -2%	452 -18%	424 -23%	543 -2%	533 -3%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	92 1%	91 0%	94 3%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.19	0.33 -74%	0.28 -47%	0.26 -37%	0.49 -158%	0.25 -32%
Contrast	3021	1639 -46%	1657 -45%	1712 -43%	1116 -63%	2132 -29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.5	2.7 51%	2.8 49%	5.9 -7%	4.5 18%	2.8 49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.5	4.6 52%	6.1 36%	9.3 2%	7.9 17%	5.1 46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5	3.1 38%	2 60%	6.8 -36%	5 -0%	1.9 62%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.26 ^97%	2.33 ^94%	2.2 ^100%	2.35 ^94%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	7610 ^85%	6853 ^95%	6611 ^98%	8443 ^77%	7400 ^88%	6149 ^106%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9457 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
16.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 6 ms hausse
16.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 10.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (25.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 31.2 ms hausse
49.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3015 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5576 Points ∼100% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	2744 Points ∼49% -9%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2940 Points ∼53% -2%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2638 - 3015, n=5)	2228 Points ∼40% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=316)	4562 Points ∼82% +51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	3655 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5913 Points ∼100% +62%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	3526 Points ∼60% -4%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points ∼55% -11%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3870 Points ∼65% +6%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3300 - 3660, n=6)	2904 Points ∼49% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=374)	4587 Points ∼78% +25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	749 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1639 Points ∼100% +119%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	827 Points ∼50% +10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points ∼54% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	761 Points ∼46% +2%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (749 - 824, n=6)	649 Points ∼40% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (691 - 4824, n=376)	1369 Points ∼84% +83%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5135 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6187 Points ∼100% +20%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	4558 Points ∼74% -11%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points ∼75% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	4499 Points ∼73% -12%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4912 Points ∼79% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5135, n=7)	4644 Points ∼75% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 11440, n=370)	5030 Points ∼81% -2%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6912 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6870 Points ∼99% -1%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	6861 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5431 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6385 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 6912, n=7)	5923 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (4096 - 14439, n=538)	5516 Points ∼80% -20%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2768 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1136 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points ∼54%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1779 Points ∼64%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	980 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (912 - 1025, n=6)	970 Points ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=383)	1833 Points ∼66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1262 Points ∼79%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	376 Points ∼23%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	414 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	391 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (376 - 432, n=6)	413 Points ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=383)	1606 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1436 Points ∼96%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	442 Points ∼30%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points ∼33%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	499 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	451 Points ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (435 - 493, n=6)	473 Points ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=386)	1492 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	975 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2772 Points ∼100% +184%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1144 Points ∼41% +17%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points ∼55% +55%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1765 Points ∼64% +81%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	987 Points ∼36% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (900 - 1015, n=7)	965 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4703, n=398)	1810 Points ∼65% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	452 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2006 Points ∼92% +344%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	629 Points ∼29% +39%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points ∼32% +58%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	715 Points ∼33% +58%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	663 Points ∼30% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (452 - 699, n=7)	649 Points ∼30% +44%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=398)	2191 Points ∼100% +385%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	513 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points ∼100% +304%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	699 Points ∼34% +36%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points ∼39% +57%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	824 Points ∼40% +61%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	715 Points ∼34% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (513 - 747, n=7)	698 Points ∼34% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 8141, n=399)	1863 Points ∼90% +263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2708 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1108 Points ∼41%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1707 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	998 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (860 - 1026, n=6)	957 Points ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4320, n=459)	1768 Points ∼65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1189 Points ∼89%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	297 Points ∼22%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points ∼27%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	367 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	378 Points ∼28%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (261 - 378, n=6)	329 Points ∼25%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=461)	1333 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1358 Points ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	355 Points ∼26%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points ∼32%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	445 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	439 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (309 - 439, n=6)	385 Points ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=469)	1271 Points ∼94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	943 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2834 Points ∼100% +201%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1101 Points ∼39% +17%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points ∼55% +66%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1766 Points ∼62% +87%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1026 Points ∼36% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (854 - 1050, n=7)	965 Points ∼34% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4454, n=492)	1677 Points ∼59% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	370 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1925 Points ∼100% +420%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	466 Points ∼24% +26%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points ∼37% +90%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	704 Points ∼37% +90%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	624 Points ∼32% +69%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (370 - 624, n=7)	519 Points ∼27% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=492)	1806 Points ∼94% +388%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	428 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2073 Points ∼100% +384%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	535 Points ∼26% +25%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points ∼39% +87%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	813 Points ∼39% +90%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	684 Points ∼33% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (428 - 684, n=7)	578 Points ∼28% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7820, n=500)	1550 Points ∼75% +262%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	14036 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19087 Points ∼100% +36%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	12578 Points ∼66% -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points ∼65% -12%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13655 Points ∼72% -3%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11696 Points ∼61% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9680 - 14036, n=7)	11816 Points ∼62% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (4811 - 45072, n=651)	13704 Points ∼72% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10689 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29496 Points ∼100% +176%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	9603 Points ∼33% -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points ∼46% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12281 Points ∼42% +15%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10008 Points ∼34% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9536 - 10728, n=7)	10282 Points ∼35% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7573 - 162695, n=651)	20176 Points ∼68% +89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11287 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26308 Points ∼100% +133%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	10136 Points ∼39% -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points ∼50% +17%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12562 Points ∼48% +11%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10340 Points ∼39% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9835 - 11287, n=7)	10564 Points ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (8513 - 83518, n=652)	16708 Points ∼64% +48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	51 fps ∼100% +155%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	18 fps ∼35% -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps ∼45% +15%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	22 fps ∼43% +10%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (17 - 20, n=7)	16.3 fps ∼32% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=680)	35.2 fps ∼69% +76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	27 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	44 fps ∼100% +63%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	25 fps ∼57% -7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps ∼77% +26%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	33 fps ∼75% +22%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (24 - 27, n=7)	22.3 fps ∼51% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=683)	27.1 fps ∼62% 0%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	10 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps ∼100% +130%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	8.6 fps ∼37% -14%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps ∼43% -2%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	9.3 fps ∼40% -7%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9.1 - 10, n=7)	8.24 fps ∼36% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=599)	19.5 fps ∼85% +95%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	17 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	20 fps ∼100% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	15 fps ∼75% -12%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps ∼90% +6%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	17 fps ∼85% 0%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (15 - 17, n=7)	14.1 fps ∼71% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=604)	17.9 fps ∼90% +5%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.2 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps ∼94% +142%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	5.7 fps ∼36% -8%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps ∼40% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps ∼38% -2%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (5.9 - 6.2, n=7)	4.96 fps ∼31% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=460)	16 fps ∼100% +158%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	11 fps ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	13 fps ∼85% +18%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	10 fps ∼65% -9%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps ∼85% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13 fps ∼85% +18%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 11, n=7)	9.14 fps ∼60% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=463)	15.3 fps ∼100% +39%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.3 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	4.8 fps ∼54% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	3.6 fps ∼40% -16%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps ∼44% -9%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.7 fps ∼42% -14%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.2 - 4.3, n=7)	3.67 fps ∼41% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 59, n=163)	8.9 fps ∼100% +107%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.6 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	3.2 fps ∼52% +100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1.1 fps ∼18% -31%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps ∼19% -25%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1.1 fps ∼18% -31%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=7)	1.186 fps ∼19% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=163)	6.19 fps ∼100% +287%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6.8 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.6 fps ∼56% +12%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	5.8 fps ∼43% -15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps ∼49% -3%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps ∼45% -10%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.7 - 6.8, n=7)	5.81 fps ∼43% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=164)	13.5 fps ∼100% +99%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.7 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	8.7 fps ∼59% +85%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	3.2 fps ∼22% -32%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps ∼24% -23%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.4 fps ∼23% -28%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.6 - 4.7, n=7)	3.26 fps ∼22% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=164)	14.8 fps ∼100% +215%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2.9 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.1 fps ∼85% +214%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	2.6 fps ∼24% -10%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps ∼33% +21%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.4 fps ∼32% +17%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2.8 - 2.9, n=7)	2.3 fps ∼21% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=389)	10.7 fps ∼100% +269%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.7 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	7.8 fps ∼80% +66%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	3.8 fps ∼39% -19%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps ∼72% +49%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.8 fps ∼70% +45%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.8 - 5.1, n=7)	3.9 fps ∼40% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=393)	9.7 fps ∼100% +106%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	76398 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	143352 Points ∼100% +88%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	72796 Points ∼51% -5%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	77652 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	73468 Points ∼51% -4%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	77798 Points ∼54% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (71347 - 77798, n=7)	74950 Points ∼52% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (52607 - 398720, n=282)	131480 Points ∼92% +72%

BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	703 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1086 Points ∼100% +54%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	765 Points ∼70% +9%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points ∼77% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	835 Points ∼77% +19%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	776 Points ∼71% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10 - 784, n=6)	630 Points ∼58% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=613)	744 Points ∼69% +6%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	799 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2308 Points ∼100% +189%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	678 Points ∼29% -15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points ∼43% +25%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	964 Points ∼42% +21%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	760 Points ∼33% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (744 - 799, n=6)	767 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=613)	1960 Points ∼85% +145%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1019 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2332 Points ∼100% +129%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	790 Points ∼34% -22%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points ∼56% +29%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1377 Points ∼59% +35%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1247 Points ∼53% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (690 - 1247, n=6)	997 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=613)	1465 Points ∼63% +44%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2619 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5141 Points ∼100% +96%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	2707 Points ∼53% +3%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points ∼52% +3%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2879 Points ∼56% +10%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	2517 Points ∼49% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (2176 - 2619, n=6)	2394 Points ∼47% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=613)	2881 Points ∼56% +10%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Wiko View 3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1106 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2342 Points ∼100% +112%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 3072	1026 Points ∼44% -7%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points ∼56% +18%
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1337 Points ∼57% +21%
Sony Xperia L3 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1166 Points ∼50% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (331 - 1166, n=6)	970 Points ∼41% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=617)	1432 Points ∼61% +29%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=89)	30.7 Points ∼100% +137%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	15.921 Points ∼52% +23%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)	14.694 Points ∼48% +14%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	14.579 Points ∼47% +13%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	13.684 Points ∼45% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.7, n=2)	13.3 Points ∼43% +3%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	12.933 Points ∼42%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	10679 Points ∼100% +160%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=673)	6334 Points ∼59% +54%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points ∼45% +17%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	4422 Points ∼41% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=7)	4155 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	4115 Points ∼39% 0%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	4114 Points ∼39%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)	4018 Points ∼38% -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)	11757.3 ms * ∼100%
ZTE Blade V10 Vita (Chrome 74)	11697.7 ms * ∼99% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12709, n=7)	11672 ms * ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)	11184.8 ms * ∼95% +5%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	11012.1 ms * ∼94% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=693)	10747 ms * ∼91% +9%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768.3 ms * ∼83% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)	3948 ms * ∼34% +66%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Wiko View 3	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7	ZTE Blade V10 Vita	Nokia 4.2	Huawei Y7 2019	Sony Xperia L3	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		30%	-22%	-37%	21%	-1%	28%	5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	61.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100) -11%	48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=406) -23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	81.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100) -9%	66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=406) -18%
Random Write 4KB	8.98	16.06 79%	9.99 11%	4.31 -52%	17.48 95%	16.36 82%	24.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=111) 168%	20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722) 127%
Random Read 4KB	55.23	82.94 50%	20.32 -63%	17.51 -68%	83.53 51%	28.83 -48%	54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=111) -2%	45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722) -18%
Sequential Write 256KB	132.39	204.72 55%	119.45 -10%	18.17 -86%	88.77 -33%	87.52 -34%	171 (40 - 246, n=111) 29%	92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722) -30%
Sequential Read 256KB	287.32	283.36 -1%	95.57 -67%	220.39 -23%	305.05 6%	290.89 1%	272 (95.6 - 704, n=111) -5%	261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722) -9%

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


29.7 °C	30 °C	28.8 °C
29.7 °C	29.8 °C	29.6 °C
29.1 °C	29.1 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 30.1 °C
Moyenne: 29.5 °C


28 °C	28.7 °C	29.6 °C
28.5 °C	28.8 °C	29.8 °C
28 °C	28.2 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 29.8 °C
Moyenne: 28.8 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 26.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Wiko View 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au repos	0.67 / 1.73 / 1.79 Watts
Fortement sollicité	2.18 / 3.43 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Wiko View 3 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	ZTE Blade V10 Vita 3200 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-59%	-35%	-21%	-10%	-4%	-20%	-40%
Idle Minimum *	0.67	0.61 9%	0.69 -3%	0.74 -10%	0.51 24%	0.57 15%	0.733 (0.57 - 1, n=7) -9%	0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=749) -31%
Idle Average *	1.73	1.95 -13%	2.03 -17%	1.9 -10%	1.7 2%	1.5 13%	1.659 (1.3 - 2.4, n=7) 4%	1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=748) -0%
Idle Maximum *	1.79	2.03 -13%	2.06 -15%	2.21 -23%	1.85 -3%	1.51 16%	2.05 (1.51 - 2.9, n=7) -15%	2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=749) -13%
Load Average *	2.18	4.56 -109%	3.55 -63%	3.04 -39%	3.17 -45%	3.09 -42%	3.15 (2.18 - 4, n=7) -44%	4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=743) -86%
Load Maximum *	3.43	9.15 -167%	6.15 -79%	4.15 -21%	4.44 -29%	4.15 -21%	4.64 (3.43 - 5.9, n=7) -35%	5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=743) -71%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		16h 35min

	Wiko View 3 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh	ZTE Blade V10 Vita 3200 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3	995	768 -23%	644 -35%	696 -30%	1113 12%	641 -36%

Points positifs

+ écran IPS lumineux

+ autonomie

+ précision du GPS

+ design

+ appareils photo

+ chauffe

Points négatifs

- haut-parleur

- résolution 720p

- Widevine L3

- SoC

Verdict

En test : le Wiko View 3. Modèle de test fourni par Wiko Allemagne.

Wiko a bien fait les choses avec son smartphone View 3 d’entrée de gamme. Malgré son prix contenu, le design est moderne, les bordures d’écran plutôt fines, et les finitions satisfaisantes. De plus, il propose de bons appareils photo qui se sont avérés en partie étonnamment bons, ainsi qu’une très bonne autonomie et que des composants utiles telles une LED de notification et une prise jack 3,5 mm.

Ceux qui recherchent un smartphone abordable avec un design moderne et une bonne autonomie, mais qui sont prêts à accepter des compromis, devraient être satisfaits du Wiko View 3.

Mais le smartphone possède également des défauts visibles au quotidien. Alors que l’on pourra supporter les mauvais haut-parleurs et la faible résolution de la dalle IPS autrement réussie – même si la série Redmi de Xiaomi possède des écrans 1080p dans cette gamme de prix à moins de 200 € - il sera plus difficile de se contenter des faibles performances du Helio P22. Avec un tel compromis qu’un écran 720p en 2019, les utilisateurs devraient pouvoir espérer de meilleures performances au quotidien, d’autant plus que le View 3 possède une version d’Android Vanilla presque pas modifiée. Nous avons réduit légèrement notre notation des performances à cause de cela.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Wiko View 3 - 2019-07-2707/27/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis

83%

Clavier

67 / 75 → 89%

Dispositif de pointage

88%

Connectivité

36 / 60 → 60%

Poids

90%

Autonomie

100%

Écran

84%

Performances en jeu

22 / 63 → 35%

Performances dans les applications

36 / 70 → 51%

Chauffe

94%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

52 / 91 → 57%

Appareil photo

52%

Moyenne

70%

81%

Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Courte critique du Wiko View 3 : smartphone abordable à l'autonomie exceptionnelle

Comparaison des tailles

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Wiko View 3 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

Points positifs

Points négatifs

Verdict

Pricecompare