Notebookcheck

Test du Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop Review: A gaming laptop with slim bezels

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 11/30/2019

Une alternative Clevo. Quand on en vient aux PC portables haut de gammes configurables, le constructeur Clevo a longtemps été le meneur. Tongfang a remis en cause cette domination depuis un certain temps, si bien que nous avons pris une nouvelle vois le châssis GKCQ7Z, pour voir ce qu’il en est. Lisez ce rapport pour voir comment le XMG Neo 15 avec un processeur Intel de 9e génération et une carte graphique de la série RTX 20 se comporte dans nos tests.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (XMG Neo 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 885 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Mémoire
32768 Mo 
, 2x 16 Go SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, double canal. Tous les emplacements occupés, maximum de 64 Go.
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001, 1024 Go 
, NVMe, deux emplacements M.2-2280
Carte son
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: jac micro et jack écouteurs, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Réseau
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 22 x 359 x 243
Batterie
62 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2.0, Clavier: RVB, mécanique, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 230 watts, Control Center, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.056 kg, Alimentation: 690 g
Prix
2268 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

NoteDateModèlePoidsÉpaisseurTailleRésolutionBest Price
84%11/19Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg22 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%08/19Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%06/19Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%09/19HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%10/19Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=262)
91.7 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=260)
109 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼78%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
307
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 313 cd/m² Moyenne: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 1043:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
27%
-26%
-24%
-41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 (4.8, 4.8)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
46%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
19 (9, 10)
-98%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
10%
10 (6, 4)
17%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
4%
1%
-18%
19%
Brightness middle
313
288
-8%
266
-15%
324.8
4%
477
52%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
431
46%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
89
0%
84
-6%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.26
13%
0.175
42%
Contrast
1043
1309
26%
858
-18%
1249
20%
2726
161%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.33
3.22
3%
2.78
17%
4.96
-49%
4.17
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.25
6.26
-0%
5.96
5%
8.95
-43%
6.97
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.77
1.5
15%
0.91
49%
3.23
-82%
2.51
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.43
-11%
3.58
-15%
5
-61%
3.49
-13%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.5 88%
CCT
6930 94%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
7076 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
93
3%
96
7%
91.8
2%
91
1%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
16% / 7%
-13% / -3%
-21% / -19%
-11% / 10%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
12 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.8 ms hausse
↘ 5.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
9.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 4.8 ms hausse
↘ 4.8 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9364 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - HWiNFO.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - GPU-Z.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - AS SSD Benchmark.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - CrystalDiskMark.
Schenker XMG Neo 15 - LatencyMon.
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1132 (1125.75-1244.28)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
448 Points ∼98% +3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼97% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=59)
431 Points ∼94% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼94% -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
2694 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=59)
2558 Points ∼95% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼91% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼90% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points ∼88%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼85% -4%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=534)
157 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=537)
839 Points ∼71% -29%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1181 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points ∼99% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼96% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼95% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=230)
5242 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
22%
27%
-32%
Write 4K
108.7
108.8
0%
115.5
6%
137.4
26%
134.2
23%
Read 4K
41.4
40.31
-3%
57.97
40%
41.37
0%
37.72
-9%
Write Seq
1083
2488
130%
1555
44%
2500
131%
389.2
-64%
Read Seq
917.2
1916
109%
2590
182%
1576
72%
1030
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
468.5
382.4
-18%
369.3
-21%
446.7
-5%
238.9
-49%
Read 4K Q32T1
529.6
421.8
-20%
441.7
-17%
522.4
-1%
343.9
-35%
Write Seq Q32T1
3057
2542
-17%
1547
-49%
2796
-9%
789.1
-74%
Read Seq Q32T1
3422
3320
-3%
2969
-13%
3415
0%
1501.9
-56%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3422 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 529.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 468.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 917.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1083 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 108.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18275 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34619 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15226 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6358 points
Aide
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3921 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼95% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼95% -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼95% -1%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6831 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼99% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼98% +5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points ∼94%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16968 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼91% -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21959 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points ∼96%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼81% -16%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
72.6 (min: 59) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
60.4 (min: 49) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼70% -16%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
100.8 (min: 78) fps ∼100% +21%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
83.2 (min: 65) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (64 - 83.2, n=3)
76.2 fps ∼76% -8%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
79.4 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
65.1 (min: 54) fps ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 67, n=7)
49.1 fps ∼62% -25%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
66 (min: 31) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
57 (min: 30) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 57, n=8)
41.8 fps ∼63% -27%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
210 (min: 164) fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
195 (min: 149) fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (58.3 - 201, n=9)
147 fps ∼70% -25%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
63.3 fps ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
53 fps ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.3 - 79.4, n=12)
43.7 fps ∼69% -18%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
71.2 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
59.3 (min: 52) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.2 - 91.7, n=16)
46.9 fps ∼66% -21%
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
143 (min: 139) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
123 (min: 114) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.5 - 144, n=20)
99.8 fps ∼70% -19%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
98.1 (min: 90) fps ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
83.2 (min: 76) fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (45.1 - 124, n=21)
79.7 fps ∼81% -4%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.4 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 124 123 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 85.5 83.2 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 147 105 fps
Control (2019) 59.3 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 69.3 53 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 203 195 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 78 57 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 65.1 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 96.9 83.2 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 91.8 84.4 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.839.637.235.732.937.7254445.244.644.842.346.83133.337.736.43534.235.24031.336.736.533.434.234.45039.839.440.83937.533.46334.234.133.430.632.331.88032.533.932.433.930.848.810029.932.232.732.131.433.612530.93331.930.129.232.316034.435.936.735.134.333.520035.628.728.92826.630.825032.627.831.227.726.232.431532.126.927.924.822.834.340030.925.826.121.219.836.150031.92625.420.519.437.36303225.423.620.721.636.280033.725.221.818.417.338.6100034.726.222.718.417.240.6125035.726.623.618.918.841.5160037.828.922.818.318.143.9200038.726.521.61816.844.625003724.120.418.41743.5315035.32319.417.816.944400035.822.419.117.716.744.1500032.120.21817.717.240.9630029.618.517.817.516.939.5800025.21817.717.816.935.21000022.91817.817.71733.41250019.71817.717.518.428.21600018.517.717.717.516.922.6SPL473734.531.730.953.9N5.72.82.31.71.69.3median 32.1median 25.8median 22.7median 18.4median 18.1median 36.2Delta2.72.84.93.343.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31 / 34 / 37 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
47 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
-1%
7%
9%
6%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=332)
5%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
31
-0%
30.5
2%
31.3
-1%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=755)
-1%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
31.3
8%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=755)
4%
Idle Maximum *
37
39
-5%
39
-5%
31.5
15%
31.3
15%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=755)
6%
Load Average *
47
45
4%
46
2%
40.6
14%
42
11%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=756)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
42.1
16%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
55
-2%
53.4
1%
46.5
14%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=756)
11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 58 °C60 °C49 °C 
 42 °C47 °C41 °C 
 36 °C40 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 60 °C
Moyenne: 45.9 °C
66 °C66 °C56 °C
65 °C65 °C45 °C
37 °C37 °C32 °C
Maximum: 66 °C
Moyenne: 52.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  47 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-14.2 °C / -25.6 F).
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
2%
-11%
-1%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
60
49
18%
58
3%
48.8
19%
43.9
27%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=721)
23%
Maximum Bottom *
66
59
11%
64
3%
55
17%
47.6
28%
49.7 (25.9 - 78, n=719)
25%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
41
-37%
38.6
-29%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=673)
-3%
Idle Bottom *
32
29
9%
31
3%
45.6
-43%
40.8
-28%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=671)
1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.9342542.338.93134.2324034.2365037.539.76332.334.28030.832.610031.429.512529.231.816034.33320026.632.425026.246.331522.856.640019.862.450019.460.263021.665.980017.376.1100017.273.6125018.866.4160018.165.7200016.866.425001765.3315016.968.2400016.766.5500017.267.5630016.971.5800016.968.4100001767.41250018.464.51600016.959.5SPL30.981.1N1.650median 18.1median 65.7Delta48.431.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.76.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.9 / 2.4 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 21 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 94 / 173 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-38%
-144%
-38%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
21
-91%
46
-318%
22.2
-102%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
-76%
Idle Average *
15
12
20%
23
-53%
59
-293%
24.9
-66%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
32
-52%
65.5
-212%
30.6
-46%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
-44%
Load Average *
94
86
9%
97
-3%
99.8
-6%
101
-7%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
-11%
Load Maximum *
173
177
-2%
213
-23%
222.7
-29%
186
-8%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143
144
-1%
148
-3%
154.1
-8%
143
-0%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
7h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 40min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 19min
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Autonomie de la batterie
38%
59%
-37%
-47%
-15%
Reader / Idle
439
666
52%
545
24%
221
-50%
349 (39 - 1174, n=676)
-21%
WiFi v1.3
340
478
41%
421
24%
129
-62%
179
-47%
259 (78 - 622, n=380)
-24%
Load
79
96
22%
181
129%
80
1%
79 (18 - 202, n=642)
0%
H.264
408
257 (88 - 508, n=148)

Points positifs

+ compact
+ léger
+ robuste
+ clavier mécanique
+ rétroéclairage RVB
+ 144 Hz
+ bordures d'écran étroites
+ configurable individuellement

Points négatifs

- températures externes
- ventilateurs bruyants
- absence de Thunderbolt 3
- haut-parleurs

Verdict

En test : le Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par bestware.com.
En test : le Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par bestware.com.

Dans l’ensemble, le Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 est un bon portable de jeu, mis à part pour ses températures extérieures élevées et son niveau sonore en jeu. Notre modèle, équilibré et puissant, devrait pouvoir séduire la plupart des joueurs.

La combinaison d’un Core i7-9750H et d’une RTX 2070 Max-Q permet à l’appareil de faire tourner fluidement tous les jeux modernes sur son écran 144 Hz. Et le châssis compact en métal et le clavier mécanique avec rétroéclairage RVB sont de bons arguments en faveur du portable. La possibilité de configurer individuellement l’appareil est également un plus.

Il eut été bien que Schenker intègre un port Thunderbolt 3 et de meilleurs haut-parleurs. Cependant, cela ne devrait pas condamner le XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19, puisqu’il excelle dans les autres domaines.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 - 11/25/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis
82 / 98 → 84%
Clavier
89%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
61 / 80 → 77%
Poids
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Autonomie
67 / 95 → 71%
Écran
86%
Performances en jeu
89%
Performances dans les applications
91%
Chauffe
68 / 95 → 72%
Nuisance sonore
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
74%
Moyenne
76%
84%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop Review: A gaming laptop with slim bezels
Florian Glaser, 2019-11-30 (Update: 2019-11-30)