Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Le Intel Celeron T3000 est un Dual-core Penryn bas de gamme. Il y a beaucoup de fonctions en moins, et surtout Speedstep ce qui mène à une autonomie médiocre (comparé aux Core 2 Duo). La Virtualization et Trusted Execution sont absents aussi.

Les performances du T3000 sont à égalité avec les AMD Turion X2 de 2.0 - 2.3 GHz (selon le benchmark). Les applications gourmandes vont ramer rapidement.

GammeIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Nom de codePenryn-1M
Fréquence1800 MHz
Bus système800
Cache de Niveau 1 (L1)64 KB
Cache de Niveau 2 (L2)1 MB
Nombres de cœurs/threads simultanés supportés2 / 2
Consommation énergétique maximale (TDP)35 Watt(s)
Nombre de transistors410 Million(s)
Fonctionnalités45 nm1.175
Taille du Die107 mm2
Température maximale105 °C
SocketP (478)
FonctionnalitésMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, exBit
64 BitPrend en charge les instructions 64 Bit
Architecturex86
Date de présentation05/01/2009
Lien redirigeant vers une page externe du produitIntel Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1797 points (16%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3329 points (5%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
45.7 s (9%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1593 Points (3%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31.8 s (7%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3572 Points (22%)
+ 1 Plus de détails   + Montrer le tableau de comparaison
- Amplitude des valeurs obtenues dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
- Valeur moyenne obtenue dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
* Plus les chiffres sont petits, plus les performances sont élevées

v1.17
log 13. 23:24:56

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 12 May 2022 10:17:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#3 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.001s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 502 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#7 got single benchmarks 502 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.014s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.017s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.019s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.022s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.024s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.025s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.027s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.03s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.032s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.036s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.038s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.042s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.045s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#67 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.05s

#68 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.05s

#69 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Critiques du Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 processeur

Lenovo ThinkPad R500 (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, 15.40")
» Lenovo ThinkPad R500 - Autres tests

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparaison des processeurs pour ordinateur portable
Comparaison de tout les processeurs mobiles

 

» Processeurs mobiles - liste des benchmarks
Liste des benchmarks de l'intégralité des processeurs pour portables

 

Les autres processeurs de la gamme Celeron Dual-Core

» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
   2x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
   2x 1.83 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
   2x 1.66 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
   2x 1.87 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
   2x 1.73 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
   2x 1.2 GHz

Processeurs similaires

+ AMD Turion X2 RM-76
   2x 2.3 GHz
+ AMD A6 Pro-7050B
   2x 2.2 GHz - 3 GHz
+ AMD A6-7000
   2x 2.2 GHz - 3 GHz
+ AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-66
   2x 2.3 GHz
+ Intel Core Duo T2500
   2x 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
   2x 1.8 GHz
- AMD A6-5345M
   2x 2.2 GHz - 2.8 GHz
- Intel Core i5-540UM
   2x 1.2 GHz - 2 GHz
- Intel Celeron J1800
   2x 2.41 GHz - 2.58 GHz
- AMD Athlon X2 QL-67
   2x 2.2 GHz
- AMD Turion X2 RM-75
   2x 2.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2012-05-18)