Notebookcheck

Test du Chuwi Hi10 X (N4100, UHD 600, FHD) : châssis en métal pour moins de 250 €

Que pour des sollicitations réduites. Jusqu'où peut nous mener une tablette Windows 10 refroidie passivement proposée par un fabricant chinois peu connu ? Ceux qui se contentent d'un peu de web et de traitement de texte pourront être tout juste satisfaits par la Chuwi Hi10 X.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots),
Chinese Tech Touchscreen Convertible / 2-in-1 Tablet
Chuwi Hi10 X (Hi10 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Celeron N4100 4 x 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, Gemini Lake
Carte graphique
Intel UHD Graphics 600, 26.20.100.7262
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
, 1066 MHz, double canal
Écran
10.10 pouces 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPP, capacitif 10 points, AU Optronics AUO17D8, IPS, brillant: oui, detachable screen, 60 Hz
Disque dur
SanDisk DF4128, 128 Go 
Connexions
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, Capteurs: accéléromètre
Réseau
Wireless AC-9461 (ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.8 x 261.8 x 167.3
Batterie
24 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 5 MPix
Appareil photo secondaire: 2 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: non, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
600 g, Alimentation: 188 g
Liens
Chuwi Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
69 %
06/20
Chuwi Hi10 X
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600		600 g8.8 mm10.10"1920x1200
83 %
10/18
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615		523 g8.3 mm10.00"1800x1200
80 %
02/18
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)		1 kg17.5 mm10.10"1920x1200
77 %
12/18
HP x2 210 G2
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)		1.2 kg23.5 mm10.10"1280x800
68 %
05/20
Jumper EZbook X3
Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500		1.3 kg18 mm13.30"1920x1080
❌
262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g261.8 mm 167.3 mm 8.8 mm 600 g242 mm 166 mm 23 mm 580 g252.5 mm 163 mm 9.4 mm 490 g245 mm 175 mm 8.3 mm 523 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
Côté droit : USB 2.0 (sur la base).
Côté droit : USB 2.0 (sur la base).
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
Côté gauche : USB 2.0 (sur la base), lecteur de carte micro SD, USB C 2.0, USB C 3.1, Micro-HDMI, prise jack.
Côté gauche : USB 2.0 (sur la base), lecteur de carte micro SD, USB C 2.0, USB C 3.1, Micro-HDMI, prise jack.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.8 MB/s ∼100% +184%
HP x2 210 G2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
48 MB/s ∼71% +101%
Jumper EZbook X3
 
24.3 MB/s ∼36% +2%
Chuwi Hi10 X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼35%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.2 MB/s ∼34% -3%
Dell Latitude 3400
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼34% -4%
LincPlus P1
 
18.1 MB/s ∼27% -24%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 MB/s ∼100% +224%
HP x2 210 G2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
76.4 MB/s ∼90% +192%
Dell Latitude 3400
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.3 MB/s ∼38% +23%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼32% +3%
Jumper EZbook X3
 
27 MB/s ∼32% +3%
LincPlus P1
 
27 MB/s ∼32% +3%
Chuwi Hi10 X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
26.2 MB/s ∼31%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s ∼100% +58%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
448 (399min - 476max) MBit/s ∼77% +22%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Wireless AC-9461
367 (359min - 373max) MBit/s ∼63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
289 MBit/s ∼50% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
483 (364min - 559max) MBit/s ∼100% +40%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s ∼99% +38%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Wireless AC-9461
346 (309min - 369max) MBit/s ∼72%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
272 MBit/s ∼56% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (359-373)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (309-369)
ColorChecker
2.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
18 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Chuwi Hi10 X: 11.7 ∆E min: 2.83 - max: 19.44 ∆E
257.8
cd/m²		265.6
cd/m²		259.6
cd/m²
248.8
cd/m²		256.3
cd/m²		256.2
cd/m²
245.9
cd/m²		253.5
cd/m²		250.9
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
AU Optronics AUO17D8
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 265.6 cd/m² Moyenne: 255 cd/m² Minimum: 31.63 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 93 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 256.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 625:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.04 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.17
ΔE Greyscale 10.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Chuwi Hi10 X
AU Optronics AUO17D8, IPS, 10.10, 1920x1200		Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 10.10, 1920x1200		Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 10.10, 1920x1200		Chuwi HiPad
IPS, 10.10, 1920x1200		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 10.00, 1800x1200		Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
YF102, MS_9003, IPS, 10.10, 1920x1200
Response Times
-34%
-52%
-39%
-25%
-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 (18.8, 11.6)
49.6 (26, 23.6)
-63%
52.8 (26.8, 26)
-74%
33.2 (16.4, 16.8)
-9%
44 (22, 22)
-45%
32 (14, 18)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 (12.4, 12)
25.6 (8.4, 17.2)
-5%
31.6 (13.6, 18)
-30%
41.2 (25.2, 16)
-69%
25.6 (11.6, 14)
-5%
24 (13, 11)
2%
PWM Frequency
1020 (99)
19000 (90)
Screen
38%
39%
36%
55%
12%
Brightness middle
256.3
449
75%
401
56%
408.7
59%
456
78%
251
-2%
Brightness
255
425
67%
396
55%
396
55%
426
67%
244
-4%
Brightness Distribution
93
89
-4%
86
-8%
85
-9%
88
-5%
79
-15%
Black Level *
0.41
0.6
-46%
0.5
-22%
0.51
-24%
0.31
24%
0.33
20%
Contrast
625
748
20%
802
28%
801
28%
1471
135%
761
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.04
3.1
69%
2.9
71%
4.13
59%
1.3
87%
5.34
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.49
6.4
63%
5.8
67%
7.34
58%
3
83%
9.91
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.17
1.1
49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.4
3.8
63%
4.1
61%
4.4
58%
1.4
87%
6.04
42%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.09 105%
2.36 93%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
3.23 68%
CCT
10211 64%
7202 90%
7263 89%
7389 88%
6687 97%
7491 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
62.3
-1%
51
-19%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.7
96.8
0%
81
-16%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
2% / 24%
-7% / 20%
-2% / 21%
15% / 43%
5% / 10%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 12.4 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
30.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18.8 ms hausse
↘ 11.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9581 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Chuwi Hi10 X UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø170 (168.8-171.36)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, SanDisk DF4128; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø97.7 (95.02-98.38)
HP x2 210 G2 HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø96.1 (93.86-96.75)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø163 (162.13-163.67)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
406 Points ∼100% +137%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
350 Points ∼86% +105%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
213 Points ∼52% +25%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (161 - 254, n=12)
206 Points ∼51% +20%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel Core M-5Y10a
190 Points ∼47% +11%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
171 (168.8min - 171.36max) Points ∼42%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼40% -4%
Lhmzniy A9 15.6
Intel Celeron 3867U
134 Points ∼33% -22%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
121 (118.17min - 121.14max) Points ∼30% -29%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
97 Points ∼24% -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
92 Points ∼23% -46%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
82.3 (81.02min - 82.28max) Points ∼20% -52%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
157 Points ∼100% +128%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
154 Points ∼98% +124%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel Core M-5Y10a
83 Points ∼53% +21%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
78 Points ∼50% +13%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
70.9 Points ∼45% +3%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
68.8 Points ∼44%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (62 - 71, n=12)
68.1 Points ∼43% -1%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼41% -6%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
43.4 Points ∼28% -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
28 Points ∼18% -59%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
28 Points ∼18% -59%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
403 Points ∼100% +163%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
296 Points ∼73% +93%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
160 Points ∼40% +5%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
153 Points ∼38%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (151 - 155, n=7)
153 Points ∼38% 0%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
100 Points ∼25% -35%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
948 Points ∼100% +151%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
657 Points ∼69% +74%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (368 - 560, n=7)
440 Points ∼46% +16%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
378 Points ∼40%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
273 Points ∼29% -28%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
190 Points ∼20% -50%
Lhmzniy A9 15.6
Intel Celeron 3867U
159 Points ∼17% -58%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
6277 Seconds * ∼100% -83%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
4736 Seconds * ∼75% -38%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
3436 Seconds * ∼55%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (2437 - 3527, n=7)
3032 Seconds * ∼48% +12%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1264 Seconds * ∼20% +63%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3851 MIPS ∼100% +79%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
2298 MIPS ∼60% +7%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (2125 - 2459, n=7)
2209 MIPS ∼57% +3%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
2150 MIPS ∼56%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
1653 MIPS ∼43% -23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
10942 MIPS ∼100% +95%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (5620 - 7835, n=7)
6674 MIPS ∼61% +19%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
5620 MIPS ∼51%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
4114 MIPS ∼38% -27%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
3267 MIPS ∼30% -42%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
436 Points ∼100% +7%
Lhmzniy A9 15.6
Intel Celeron 3867U
434 Points ∼100% +6%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
409 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (378 - 414, n=7)
402 Points ∼92% -2%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
310 Points ∼71% -24%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (1082 - 1419, n=7)
1264 Points ∼100% +17%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
1082 Points ∼86%
Lhmzniy A9 15.6
Intel Celeron 3867U
873 Points ∼69% -19%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
797 Points ∼63% -26%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
591 Points ∼47% -45%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3.122 fps ∼100% +203%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (0.974 - 1.5, n=6)
1.211 fps ∼39% +18%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1.09 fps ∼35% +6%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
1.03 fps ∼33%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
0.79 fps ∼25% -23%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
0.65 fps ∼21% -37%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
281 s ∼100% +75%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (155 - 178, n=5)
165 s ∼59% +2%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
161 s ∼57%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
156 s ∼56% -3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
2.21 sec * ∼100% -26%
Average Intel Celeron N4100
  (1.75 - 1.786, n=5)
1.761 sec * ∼80% -1%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel Celeron N4100
1.75 sec * ∼79%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
1.652 sec * ∼75% +6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
12.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
68.8 Points
Aide
PCMark 8 | PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G
3291 Points ∼48% +20%
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (2590 - 3191, n=9)
2895 Points ∼42% +6%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
2738 Points ∼40%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1220 Points ∼18% -55%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G
2480 Points ∼40% +49%
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (1670 - 2259, n=12)
1912 Points ∼31% +14%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
1670 Points ∼27%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1546 Points ∼25% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, SanDisk DF4128
1264 Points ∼20% -24%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼12% -56%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (886 - 1237, n=9)
994 Points ∼7% +12%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
886 Points ∼6%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
605 Points ∼4% -32%
Productivity
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (2567 - 2993, n=9)
2761 Points ∼25% +6%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
2599 Points ∼23%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1121 Points ∼10% -57%
Essentials
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (3776 - 5199, n=9)
4374 Points ∼38% +4%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
4208 Points ∼37%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2662 Points ∼23% -37%
Score
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (1502 - 1920, n=9)
1639 Points ∼19% +7%
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
1527 Points ∼17%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
872 Points ∼10% -43%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1670 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2738 points
PCMark 10 Score
1527 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Chuwi Hi10 X
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128
1981.4 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Chuwi Hi10 X
SanDisk DF4128		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash		Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
SanDisk DF4128		HP x2 210 G2
64 GB eMMC Flash		Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G
AS SSD
83%
-22%
382%
Copy Game MB/s
103.75
76.48
-26%
51.39
-50%
Copy Program MB/s
88.32
44.34
-50%
36.15
-59%
Copy ISO MB/s
130.18
99.05
-24%
57.16
-56%
Score Total
117
225
92%
94
-20%
648
454%
Score Write
35
92
163%
28
-20%
199
469%
Score Read
58
88
52%
47
-19%
302
421%
Access Time Write *
1.105
0.233
79%
0.896
19%
0.104
91%
Access Time Read *
0.597
0.151
75%
0.454
24%
0.16
73%
4K-64 Write
10.16
44.48
338%
12.91
27%
152.48
1401%
4K-64 Read
25.96
40.27
55%
28.99
12%
241.96
832%
4K Write
12.4
35.07
183%
7.42
-40%
33.22
168%
4K Read
5.94
18.29
208%
5.51
-7%
19.3
225%
Seq Write
120.76
126.65
5%
41.75
-65%
134.69
12%
Seq Read
258.47
289.84
12%
127.49
-51%
405.38
57%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
77%
17%
Write 4K
12.85
26.91
109%
18.11
41%
Read 4K
10.02
19.72
97%
15.77
57%
Write Seq
120.8
126.2
4%
62.49
-48%
Read Seq
259.7
268
3%
121.8
-53%
Write 4K Q32T1
15.17
62.89
315%
31.72
109%
Read 4K Q32T1
33.09
39.82
20%
48.64
47%
Write Seq Q32T1
108.8
131.3
21%
95.63
-12%
Read Seq Q32T1
180.1
259.3
44%
166.5
-8%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
80% / 81%
-22% / -22%
17% / 17%
382% / 382%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SanDisk DF4128
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 180.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 108.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 33.09 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 15.17 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 259.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 120.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 10.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 12.85 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2375 Points ∼10% +556%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
1301 Points ∼5% +259%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y
1134 Points ∼5% +213%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a
764 Points ∼3% +111%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000
605 Points ∼3% +67%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (362 - 791, n=19)
530 Points ∼2% +46%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
392 Points ∼2% +8%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100
362 Points ∼1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
357 Points ∼1% -1%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2133 Points ∼4% +347%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
1461 Points ∼2% +206%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y
1257 Points ∼2% +164%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a
795 Points ∼1% +67%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000
648 Points ∼1% +36%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (410 - 638, n=19)
539 Points ∼1% +13%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100
477 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
349 Points ∼1% -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
297 Points ∼1% -38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
310 Points ∼2% +230%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (85 - 123, n=7)
105 Points ∼1% +12%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100
94 Points ∼0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1521 Points ∼4% +326%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
942 Points ∼2% +164%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y
819 Points ∼2% +129%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a
509 Points ∼1% +43%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000
459 Points ∼1% +29%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (315 - 486, n=12)
407 Points ∼1% +14%
LincPlus P1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4000
386 Points ∼1% +8%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350
364 Points ∼1% +2%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100
357 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
234 Points ∼1% -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
10966 Points ∼5% +304%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
7496 Points ∼4% +176%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y
6602 Points ∼3% +143%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10a
4498 Points ∼2% +66%
Acer TravelMate Spin B1 B118-G2-RN-P7ED
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000
3370 Points ∼2% +24%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (2714 - 3882, n=11)
3301 Points ∼2% +22%
Chuwi Hi10 X
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100
2714 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
1841 Points ∼1% -32%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
40415 Points ∼6%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y
35452 Points ∼5%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U
32448 Points ∼4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
  (8644 - 16594, n=9)
13571 Points ∼2%
3DMark 11 Performance
519 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
14062 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
2346 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
327 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
107 points
Aide
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 19.1 12.4 5.9 5.7 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 3.94 3.48 3.18 fps
A pleine charge
 41.8 °C30.4 °C36.4 °C 
 41 °C30.2 °C32.8 °C 
 37.6 °C30 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C
32 °C35 °C42.8 °C
32.2 °C34.4 °C41 °C
32 °C34 °C38 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Moyenne: 35.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  43 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.439.342.42539.338.139.33137.53937.54039.238.739.25039.335.639.36336.936.936.98035.734.935.710035.135.435.112534.533.834.516034.333.134.320034.132.734.125035.732.235.731539.131.739.140042.130.642.150046.83046.863048.429.248.48005228.952100059.728.659.7125060.228.560.2160058.427.958.4200056.127.956.1250053.627.853.6315054.627.854.6400057.527.657.550006627.666630062.727.662.7800054.827.654.81000049.327.549.3125004527.4451600049.827.349.8SPL7140.471N24.53.924.5median 49.8median 28.5median 49.8Delta8.51.48.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi Hi10 XApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Chuwi Hi10 X audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.66 / 0.73 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.7 / 6.3 / 6.7 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 14 / 14.5 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Chuwi Hi10 X
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10.00		Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10		HP x2 210 G2
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 10.10		Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
5Y10a, HD Graphics 5300, Sandisk X110 M.2 SD6SP1M-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.80
Power Consumption
-10%
17%
24%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
2.88
22%
3
19%
2.9
22%
2
46%
Idle Average *
6.3
4.8
24%
5.3
16%
4.8
24%
5.9
6%
Idle Maximum *
6.7
7.5
-12%
6.4
4%
5.2
22%
6.2
7%
Load Average *
14
16.9
-21%
10.9
22%
10.4
26%
19.1
-36%
Load Maximum *
14.5
23.8
-64%
11
24%
10.9
25%
18.2
-26%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 36min
Chuwi Hi10 X
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 24 Wh		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 33.3 Wh		HP x2 210 G2
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32.5 Wh		Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140
5Y10a, HD Graphics 5300, 38 Wh		Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
SD 439, Adreno 505, 27 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
33%
37%
64%
137%
Reader / Idle
771
777
2083
WiFi v1.3
336
448
33%
461
37%
551
64%
795
137%
Load
180
244
288
WiFi
562

Points positifs

+ appareils photo avant et arrière de 2 et 5 MP
+ châssis en aluminium
+ couverture sRVB supérieure à 95 %
+ lecteur micro SD
+ retour du clavier
+ charge USB C
+ autonomie
+ prix
+ sans ventilateur

Points négatifs

- fidélité des couleurs en sortie d'usine
- performances globales
- clickpad
- haut-parleurs
- luminosité
- charnière
- poids
- bordures d'écran
En test : le Chuwi Hi10 X. Modèle de test fourni par Chuwi.
En test : le Chuwi Hi10 X. Modèle de test fourni par Chuwi.

Le Chuwi Hi10 X possède une poignée de qualité. Le châssis robuste et le clavier laissent une bonne impression, vu le prix, et le nombre de port est appréciable. Malheureusement cela ne suffit pas à compenser le clickpad peu fiable, le jeu dans les charnières, l'écran trop peu lumineux, ou l'expérience Windows ralentie. Essayer d'utiliser la tablette à l'extérieur ou même à l'intérieur mais sans souris peut être vraiment frustrant. Nous avons plus là une tablette Windows de secours qu'une tablette pour un peu de navigation et de streaming vidéo, vu que toute autre activité la ralentira démesurément.

Nous avons là une tablette Windows passable pour de faibles sollicitations ou pour servir de centre multimédia à seule fin de streaming vidéo. Pour le reste, le clickpad est aux abonnés absents, et l'écran est trop sombre pour l'extérieur.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Chuwi Hi10 X - 05/05/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Châssis
72 / 98 → 73%
Clavier
49%
Dispositif de pointage
43%
Connectivité
41 / 75 → 55%
Poids
82 / 20-75 → 100%
Autonomie
67%
Écran
75%
Performances en jeu
15 / 78 → 19%
Performances dans les applications
53 / 85 → 63%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 51%
Appareil photo
40 / 85 → 47%
Moyenne
59%
69%
Convertible - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Chuwi Hi10 X (Hi10 Gamme)
Critique
•
Courte critique du convertible...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Chuwi Hi10 X (N4100, UHD 600, FHD) : châssis en métal pour moins de 250 €
Allen Ngo, 2020-06- 1 (Update: 2020-06- 1)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief