Test du MSI GL65 9SEK (i7-9750H, RTX 2060, FHD) : bien plus nomade que le GL63

Name: MSI GL65 9SEK
Brand: MSI

4 heures d'autonomie... au mieux. Le GL65 est une grosse évolution du GL63, que ce soit en ce qui concerne l’allure, le poids, les performances ou la taille. Mais d’autres éléments comme l’autonomie, les ports, la luminosité et la qualité d’écran n’ont pour ainsi dire pas du tout changé. Cette machine de jeu du milieu de gamme à 1 500 $ a un peu tendance à ressembler à une machine d’entrée de gamme.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots), 10/04/2019 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

MSI Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Exemplaire de test fourni par CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GL63 8RC-069US MSI GL65 9SEK Alienware m15 R2 P87F MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA ❌

Côté droit : lecteur de carte SD, 2 USB 3.1, entrée secteur.

Côté gauche : verrou de sécurité Kensington, RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, mini DisplayPort, USB 3.1, USB C 3.1 Gen. 1, écouteurs 3,5 mm, 3,5 mm écouteurs (SPDIF).

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197 MB/s ∼100% +742%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	172.4 MB/s ∼88% +637%
MSI GL65 9SEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.4 MB/s ∼12%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	15.2 MB/s ∼8% -35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s ∼100% +758%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192.1 MB/s ∼79% +581%
MSI GL65 9SEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.2 MB/s ∼12%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	21.77 MB/s ∼9% -23%

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Wireless-AC 9560	620 MBit/s ∼91% +75%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	355 MBit/s ∼52%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US Intel Wireless AC 9462	224 MBit/s ∼33% -37%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	696 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Wireless-AC 9560	659 MBit/s ∼95% +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Wireless-AC 9560	637 MBit/s ∼92%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US Intel Wireless AC 9462	340 MBit/s ∼49% -47%


253 cd/m²	270.6 cd/m²	252.9 cd/m²
239.6 cd/m²	277.3 cd/m²	245.9 cd/m²
244.5 cd/m²	274.7 cd/m²	248.6 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

AU Optronics B156HAN13.0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 277.3 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 256.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.37 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 86 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 277.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1387:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.25 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 4.39
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.04% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GL65 9SEK AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GL63 8RC-069US LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		8%	81%	76%	74%	75%
Display P3 Coverage	36.63	39.4 8%	67.64 85%	65.32 78%	65.58 79%	65.28 78%
sRGB Coverage	55.04	59.24 8%	97.54 77%	95.47 73%	92.18 67%	95.1 73%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	37.85	40.72 8%	68.93 82%	66.48 76%	66.91 77%	65.94 74%
Response Times		-4%	54%	53%	71%	55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2)	33.6 ?(16.8, 16.8) -27%	13.6 ?(8, 5.6) 48%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) 42%	7 ?(3.6, 3.4) 73%	16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 38%
Response Time Black / White *	30 ?(17.6, 12.4)	24 ?(13.2, 10.8) 20%	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) 60%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) 63%	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) 68%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 71%
PWM Frequency			23260 ?(19)	23580 ?(24)		23810 ?(24)
Screen		-10%	34%	23%	26%	3%
Brightness middle	277.3	286.5 3%	282.3 2%	266 -4%	323.6 17%	324.2 17%
Brightness	256	258 1%	269 5%	248 -3%	315 23%	304 19%
Brightness Distribution	86	82 -5%	90 5%	89 3%	91 6%	90 5%
Black Level *	0.2	0.34 -70%	0.32 -60%	0.31 -55%	0.29 -45%	0.38 -90%
Contrast	1387	843 -39%	882 -36%	858 -38%	1116 -20%	853 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.25	5.57 -6%	1.17 78%	2.78 47%	3.31 37%	5.01 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.43	16.8 14%	3.29 83%	5.96 69%	5.74 70%	12.7 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.39	4.16 5%	1.06 76%	0.91 79%	2.73 38%	1.64 63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	4.6 -31%	1.3 63%	3.58 -2%	2.9 17%	7.9 -126%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.46 ^89%	2.29 ^96%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6895 ^94%	7564 ^86%	6643 ^98%	7186 ^90%	6765 ^96%	8455 ^77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	35	37.4 7%	63.8 82%	62 77%	59.7 71%	60.8 74%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	55	58.9 7%	97.5 77%	96 75%	91.8 67%	95.5 74%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		-2% / -6%	56% / 45%	51% / 36%	57% / 40%	44% / 23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 17.6 ms hausse
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 12.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (23.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
26.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 13.2 ms hausse
26.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 20851 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 3846000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)

MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø824 (816.86-830.63)

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	203 Points ∼71% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	202 Points ∼71% +7%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points ∼66% +1%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	188 Points ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82)	184 Points ∼64% -2%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8565U	179 Points ∼63% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points ∼60% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points ∼58% -12%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points ∼55% -17%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US Intel Core i5-8300H	151 Points ∼53% -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points ∼50% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK	1821 Points ∼19% +42%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points ∼18% +34%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K	1465 Points ∼15% +14%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H	1281 Points ∼13%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85)	1182 Points ∼12% -8%
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H	1066 Points ∼11% -17%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	850 Points ∼9% -34%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US Intel Core i5-8300H	823 Points ∼8% -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points ∼8% -37%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points ∼8% -43%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8565U	557 Points ∼6% -57%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1281 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

118.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5761 Points ∼66%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5725 Points ∼65% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5697 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4395 - 5997, n=16)	5523 Points ∼63% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5492 Points ∼63% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	5374 Points ∼61% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	3912 Points ∼45% -32%
Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	9472 Points ∼82% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	9431 Points ∼82%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9380 Points ∼82% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (8361 - 10056, n=16)	9263 Points ∼81% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9042 Points ∼79% -4%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	8791 Points ∼76% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	6449 Points ∼56% -32%
Productivity
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7748 Points ∼69%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	7695 Points ∼69% -1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7657 Points ∼69% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7434 Points ∼67% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (6098 - 8106, n=16)	7382 Points ∼66% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	7180 Points ∼64% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	6097 Points ∼55% -21%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7104 Points ∼46%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7090 Points ∼46% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	6888 Points ∼44% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4344 - 8069, n=16)	6727 Points ∼43% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6690 Points ∼43% -6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	6675 Points ∼43% -6%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4134 Points ∼27% -42%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	4851 Points ∼77% +17%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4454 Points ∼71% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (3533 - 5185, n=11)	4396 Points ∼70% +6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	4207 Points ∼67% +2%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4136 Points ∼66%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3979 Points ∼63% -4%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	3927 Points ∼63% -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	6035 Points ∼85% +14%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5751 Points ∼81% +9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	5706 Points ∼80% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4450 - 5931, n=11)	5532 Points ∼78% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5289 Points ∼74% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5287 Points ∼74%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	5270 Points ∼74% 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4136 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5287 points
PCMark 10 Score		5761 points
Aide

	MSI GL65 9SEK WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI GL63 8RC-069US Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
AS SSD		-60%	59%	27%	-7%	33%
Seq Read	1315.25	512.06 -61%	2004.98 52%	2516.94 91%	1238.57 -6%	1924.95 46%
Seq Write	1378.16	456.4 -67%	1579.5 15%	923.81 -33%	920.07 -33%	2371.22 72%
4K Read	25.31	16.18 -36%	49.33 95%	59.11 134%	45.74 81%	37.2 47%
4K Write	118.19	57.1 -52%	103.79 -12%	126.51 7%	95.65 -19%	108.86 -8%
4K-64 Read	838.68	342.29 -59%	1240.56 48%	875.61 4%	322.05 -62%	1177.33 40%
4K-64 Write	720.16	127.33 -82%	1729.71 140%	921.88 28%	721.96 0%	1135.27 58%
Access Time Read *	0.116	0.197 -70%	0.054 53%	0.042 64%	0.073 37%	0.065 44%
Access Time Write *	0.091	0.061 33%	0.036 60%	0.065 29%	0.047 48%	0.108 -19%
Score Read	996	410 -59%	1490 50%	1186 19%	492 -51%	1407 41%
Score Write	976	230 -76%	1991 104%	1141 17%	910 -7%	1481 52%
Score Total	2485	850 -66%	4230 70%	2870 15%	1654 -33%	3633 46%
Copy ISO MB/s	1278.63	325.65 -75%	3024.87 137%	2085.95 63%	1236.22 -3%	2073.16 62%
Copy Program MB/s	889.12	84.83 -90%	712.72 -20%	454.24 -49%	702.66 -21%	576.02 -35%
Copy Game MB/s	1217.53	202.59 -83%	1554.28 28%	1140.57 -6%	811.76 -33%	1426.35 17%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1744 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1454 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 534.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 482.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1340 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1412 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.46 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.2 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	168006 Points ∼83% +57%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	120766 Points ∼60% +13%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	115714 Points ∼57% +8%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	107083 Points ∼53% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	107016 Points ∼53%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	103040 Points ∼51% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (55324 - 116593, n=36)	93235 Points ∼46% -13%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	88432 Points ∼44% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	82913 Points ∼41% -23%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	70414 Points ∼35% -34%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	61286 Points ∼30% -43%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	49314 Points ∼24% -54%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	27319 Points ∼54% +67%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	20434 Points ∼40% +25%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	20307 Points ∼40% +24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points ∼38% +18%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	18962 Points ∼37% +16%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	17792 Points ∼35% +9%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	16331 Points ∼32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43)	16301 Points ∼32% 0%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	15343 Points ∼30% -6%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	12038 Points ∼24% -26%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9423 Points ∼19% -42%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	7791 Points ∼15% -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	10607 Points ∼54% +72%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	7754 Points ∼39% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points ∼39% +26%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7266 Points ∼37% +18%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	6606 Points ∼33% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41)	6206 Points ∼31% +1%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6159 Points ∼31%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5699 Points ∼29% -7%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	5689 Points ∼29% -8%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3749 Points ∼19% -39%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3510 Points ∼18% -43%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2536 Points ∼13% -59%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	5860 Points ∼45% +83%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	4275 Points ∼33% +33%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	4265 Points ∼33% +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (3020 - 3859, n=29)	3431 Points ∼26% +7%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	3203 Points ∼24%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	37768 Points ∼62% +79%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	27109 Points ∼44% +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	26582 Points ∼43% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points ∼43% +25%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	24926 Points ∼41% +18%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	23414 Points ∼38% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40)	21459 Points ∼35% +2%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	21075 Points ∼34%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	20784 Points ∼34% -1%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	15145 Points ∼25% -28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	13138 Points ∼21% -38%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	9466 Points ∼15% -55%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	16253 Points ∼61% +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points ∼52% +8%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	12949 Points ∼49% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12732 Points ∼48% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12697 Points ∼48%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12421 Points ∼47% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40)	11688 Points ∼44% -8%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	11288 Points ∼42% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	10020 Points ∼38% -21%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9140 Points ∼34% -28%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	8540 Points ∼32% -33%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7358 Points ∼28% -42%

3DMark 11 Performance		18334 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34921 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14827 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6197 points
Aide

... en comparaison

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	109 fps ∼100% +43%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	97 fps ∼89% +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	90 fps ∼83% +18%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	84 fps ∼77% +11%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	76 fps ∼70%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	73 fps ∼67% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	49 fps ∼45% -36%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	34 fps ∼31% -55%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	31 fps ∼28% -59%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	105 (86^min) fps ∼100% +79%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.3 fps ∼91% +62%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	80.6 fps ∼77% +37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	80.3 fps ∼76% +37%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	73 (60^min) fps ∼70% +24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	72.7 (61^min - 82^max) fps ∼69% +24%
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	70.9 fps ∼68% +21%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	66.9 fps ∼64% +14%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	65 fps ∼62% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	64.1 fps ∼61% +9%
Alienware 17 R5 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	60.8 fps ∼58% +4%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	60.5 fps ∼58% +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	58.7 fps ∼56%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	55.1 fps ∼52% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	48.8 fps ∼46% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	39 fps ∼37% -34%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	38.1 fps ∼36% -35%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	37 fps ∼35% -37%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	36 fps ∼34% -39%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	25.8 fps ∼25% -56%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	21.9 fps ∼21% -63%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	345.1	285.1	277.4	150.3	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)	286	204	117.5	58.7	fps
Rocket League (2017)	244	249.3	246.9		fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	130	96	88	76	fps

	MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
Noise		8%	8%	-3%	0%	-3%
off / environment *	28.1	28.6 -2%	28.3 -1%	30 -7%	28.7 -2%	28.3 -1%
Idle Minimum *	31.4	28.6 9%	30.4 3%	31 1%	29.8 5%	28.5 9%
Idle Average *	31.5	31.6 -0%	30.5 3%	34 -8%	32.4 -3%	28.5 10%
Idle Maximum *	33.5	31.6 6%	30.6 9%	39 -16%	38 -13%	49 -46%
Load Average *	49.3	38.6 22%	37.6 24%	46 7%	38.2 23%	49 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51.3	40.6 21%	46 10%	53 -3%	56.6 -10%	49 4%
Load Maximum *	58	56.8 2%	55.1 5%	55 5%	56.6 2%	55 5%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		31.4 / 31.5 / 33.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		49.3 / 58 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


43.4 °C	49 °C	42.6 °C
39.4 °C	47.8 °C	34.6 °C
36 °C	32 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Moyenne: 39.2 °C


51.2 °C	32 °C	54.2 °C
30.2 °C	41 °C	41 °C
28 °C	30.8 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Moyenne: 37.4 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 53 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


37.6 °C	40.4 °C	37.6 °C
35.6 °C	39.6 °C	35.4 °C
34.2 °C	32.2 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 40.4 °C
Moyenne: 35.9 °C


38 °C	33.2 °C	40 °C
30.2 °C	35 °C	35.8 °C
28.8 °C	31.8 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Moyenne: 33.8 °C

Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


44 °C	49 °C	37.4 °C
38.6 °C	46 °C	36 °C
35.2 °C	32.6 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Moyenne: 38.4 °C


53 °C	36.8 °C	52 °C
30 °C	40 °C	36.8 °C
28.2 °C	33.2 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Moyenne: 37.7 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 51 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-7 °C / -12.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GL65 9SEK audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.65 / 0.99 Watts
Au repos	41 / 45.3 / 47.1 Watts
Fortement sollicité	94.9 / 214.2 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		54%	25%	22%	30%	42%
Idle Minimum *	41	7.1 83%	18.3 55%	21 49%	13.6 67%	8.7 79%
Idle Average *	45.3	9.8 78%	22 51%	23 49%	17.9 60%	13 71%
Idle Maximum *	47.1	10.4 78%	28.8 39%	32 32%	20.6 56%	14.3 70%
Load Average *	94.9	88.8 6%	93 2%	97 -2%	96 -1%	107.4 -13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	149.4	93.3 38%	142.6 5%	148 1%	154.6 -3%	129 14%
Load Maximum *	214.2	132.5 38%	215.9 -1%	213 1%	218.6 -2%	151.5 29%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		4h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 50min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		1h 00min

	MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh	MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie		16%	57%	131%	-21%	43%
Reader / Idle	262	440 68%		545 108%		554 111%
WiFi v1.3	230	255 11%	362 57%	421 83%	181 -21%	332 44%
Load	60	41 -32%		181 202%		44 -27%

Points positifs

+ lecteur de carte SD, mini DisplayPort, jack micro dédié

+ performances supérieure à la moyenne du Core i7-9750H (ventilateurs en mode Turbo)

+ léger et bordures d'écran étroites

+ pavé numérique, touches des flèches grand format

+ boutons de souris dédiés

+ rétroéclairage RVB individuel

+ dalle 120 Hz

Points négatifs

- temps de réponse, ghosting

- ports serrés vers l'avant

- basses

- fuites de lumière

- ventilateurs presque toujours actifs

- autonomie

- pas de Thunderbolt 3

- lecteur de carte SD lent

- espace colorimétrique

En test : le MSI GL65 9SEK-024US. Modèle de test fourni par Computer Upgrade King.

Le plus gros et le plus notable progrès du GL65 sur le GL63 est son châssis plus compact et plus portable. Il est d’environ 16 % plus compact que celui de son prédécesseur, tout en offrant de nouveaux processeurs qui permettent des gains de performances notables.

Tout le reste est similaire au GL63. MSI avait pourtant l’occasion d’améliorer l’écran et l’autonomie, d’intégrer des ventilateurs plus silencieux, ou de proposer un lecteur de carte SD plus rapide, mais ces éléments n’ont pas changé d’une génération à l’autre. Il faudra choisir la série GS65 plus haut de gamme s’ils sont importants pour vous.

Le portable de jeu du milieu de gamme avec des performances et une allure réussies taille dans les coûts avec son autonomie et son écran : avec le MSI GL65, il faut être prêt à sacrifier l’autonomie et les couleurs.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

MSI GL65 9SEK - 2019-10-02 10/02/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Châssis

73 / 98 → 74%

Clavier

83%

Dispositif de pointage

81%

Connectivité

55 / 80 → 69%

Poids

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Autonomie

57 / 95 → 60%

Écran

80%

Performances en jeu

92%

Performances dans les applications

91%

Chauffe

81 / 95 → 85%

Nuisance sonore

65 / 90 → 72%

Audio

71%

Appareil photo

58 / 85 → 68%

Moyenne

73%

81%

Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

MSI GL65 9SEK (GL65 Gamme)

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 4752 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!