Notebookcheck

Test du LG K50 : un grand smartphone à petit prix

Mike Wobker, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 10/25/2019

Un téléphone à petit prix. Le prix du LG K50 semble bien ajusté, à environ 200 €. L’appareil possède un grand écran, un appareil photo arrière double capteur, et même un bouton d’assistant Google dédié – mais ce dernier pourra paraître un peu gadget. Lisez ce rapport de test pour découvrir comment il se comporte et comment il se situe face à la concurrence.

LG K50 (K Gamme)
Processeur
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
Carte graphique
PowerVR GE8320
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
6.26 pouces 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 17 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: jusqu'à 2 To micro SD. Systèmes de fichier FAT, FAT32 et exFAT., 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, LTE Cat. 6
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM : 900, 1 800. UMTS / WCDMA : bandes 1 & 8. LTE : B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, B38, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.7 x 161.3 x 77
Batterie
3500 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix Ouverture f/2,2, focale 26 mm. Capteur secondaire 2 MP, ouverture f/2,4.
Appareil photo secondaire: 13 MPix f/2,0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur USB, micro câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : corps - 1,05 W/kg, tête - 0,322 W/kg.
Poids
170 g, Alimentation: 50 g
Prix
200 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Aperçu de l'appareil

NoteratingversionDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
76%710/19LG K50
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
170 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
81%607/19Wiko View 3
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
75%708/19Samsung Galaxy A10
7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
168 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
78%709/19Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
76%709/19Alcatel 3 2019
439, Adreno 505
145 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.9"1560x720
82%608/19LG Q60
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
172 g6.26"1520x720
LG K50
LG K50
LG K50
LG K50
LG K50
LG K50

Comparaison des tailles

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 170 g161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 172 g159 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 178 g155.6 mm 75.6 mm 7.9 mm 168 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g151.1 mm 69.7 mm 7.99 mm 145 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼100% +280%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼69% +163%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼31% +17%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼26%
LG Q60
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762
55.4 (min: 44, max: 68) MBit/s ∼24% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 39, max: 60) MBit/s ∼24% -11%
Alcatel 3 2019
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.5 (min: 43, max: 48) MBit/s ∼20% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼100% +288%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼79% +208%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼25% -2%
LG Q60
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762
53.4 (min: 34, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼23% -9%
Alcatel 3 2019
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 (min: 38, max: 46) MBit/s ∼19% -26%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.2 (53-57)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (51-59)
GPS LG K50 : vue générale.
GPS LG K50 : vue générale.
GPS LG K50 : pont.
GPS LG K50 : pont.
GPS LG K50 : boucle.
GPS LG K50 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : pont.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 520 : boucle.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
3.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker LG K50: 6.95 ∆E min: 2.06 - max: 17.37 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
8.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker LG K50: 8.25 ∆E min: 2.07 - max: 13.94 ∆E
LG K50 - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
LG K50 - Mire de test à 1 lux.
461
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 489 cd/m² Moyenne: 452.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 85 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 489 cd/m²
Contraste: 1164:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.164
LG K50
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Samsung Galaxy A10
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Alcatel 3 2019
IPS, 1560x720, 5.9
LG Q60
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
27%
-3%
-24%
-4%
-17%
Brightness middle
489
574
17%
451
-8%
348
-29%
648
33%
477
-2%
Brightness
453
552
22%
430
-5%
355
-22%
608
34%
437
-4%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
90
6%
91
7%
89
5%
87
2%
Black Level *
0.42
0.19
55%
0.22
48%
0.26
38%
0.7
-67%
Contrast
1164
3021
160%
2050
76%
2492
114%
681
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.75
5.5
-16%
5.44
-15%
5.86
-23%
8.8
-85%
4.84
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.75
9.5
-23%
11.94
-54%
15.6
-101%
13
-68%
8.32
-7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5
-9%
7.8
-70%
3.6
22%
9.3
-102%
5.2
-13%
Gamma
2.164 102%
2.1 105%
2.206 100%
2.232 99%
2.94 75%
2.144 103%
CCT
7510 87%
7610 85%
9149 71%
7051 92%
9314 70%
7376 88%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 100 Hz

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 100 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) .

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 100 Hz est extrêmement faible, de grands risques de fatigue oculaire accrue et de maux de tête en cas d'utilisation prolongée.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9266 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
16 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2680 Points ∼52%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3015 Points ∼59% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
2832 Points ∼55% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼100% +92%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3199 Points ∼62% +19%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2687 Points ∼52% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2166 - 3015, n=6)
2664 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼91% +75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3480 Points ∼61%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3655 Points ∼65% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3590 Points ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼100% +63%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3240 Points ∼57% -7%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3434 Points ∼61% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3300 - 3660, n=7)
3468 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼83% +36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
773 Points ∼50%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
749 Points ∼49% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1168 Points ∼76% +51%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼100% +99%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
903 Points ∼59% +17%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
774 Points ∼50% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (749 - 824, n=7)
778 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼93% +84%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4052 Points ∼63%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼80% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
5136 Points ∼80% +27%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼100% +58%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4791 Points ∼75% +18%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4076 Points ∼64% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=9)
4644 Points ∼73% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=387)
5331 Points ∼83% +32%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4635 Points ∼58%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼87% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6823 Points ∼85% +47%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼100% +72%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6203 Points ∼78% +34%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4643 Points ∼58% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=9)
5891 Points ∼74% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=555)
5782 Points ∼72% +25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1615 Points ∼68% +73%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼100% +155%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1657 Points ∼69% +77%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
949 Points ∼40% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1183, n=8)
992 Points ∼42% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=395)
1979 Points ∼83% +111%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
434 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
439 Points ∼25% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼55% +127%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
419 Points ∼23% -3%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
432 Points ∼24% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 449, n=8)
420 Points ∼23% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=395)
1788 Points ∼100% +312%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
524 Points ∼32% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼68% +130%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
502 Points ∼30% +2%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
492 Points ∼30% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 521, n=8)
481 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=396)
1659 Points ∼100% +237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼40%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼42% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1629 Points ∼70% +74%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼100% +150%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1590 Points ∼68% +70%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
900 Points ∼38% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=9)
987 Points ∼42% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=423)
1891 Points ∼81% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
701 Points ∼29%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼19% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
646 Points ∼27% -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼70% +139%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
732 Points ∼31% +4%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
699 Points ∼29% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 740, n=9)
665 Points ∼28% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=423)
2388 Points ∼100% +241%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
742 Points ∼37%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼26% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
746 Points ∼37% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼89% +141%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
832 Points ∼42% +12%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
736 Points ∼37% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 808, n=9)
715 Points ∼36% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=423)
2004 Points ∼100% +170%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
897 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1682 Points ∼68% +88%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼100% +176%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1651 Points ∼67% +84%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
860 Points ∼35% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1130, n=8)
971 Points ∼39% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=475)
1887 Points ∼76% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
257 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
444 Points ∼30% +73%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼63% +262%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
370 Points ∼25% +44%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
261 Points ∼18% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 392, n=8)
328 Points ∼22% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=475)
1479 Points ∼100% +475%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
305 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
531 Points ∼37% +74%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼76% +254%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
447 Points ∼31% +47%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
309 Points ∼22% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 459, n=8)
385 Points ∼27% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=476)
1423 Points ∼100% +367%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
911 Points ∼37%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼38% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1674 Points ∼68% +84%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼100% +171%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1596 Points ∼65% +75%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
854 Points ∼35% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=9)
979 Points ∼40% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=515)
1752 Points ∼71% +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
423 Points ∼22%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼19% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
582 Points ∼30% +38%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼85% +290%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
724 Points ∼37% +71%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
454 Points ∼23% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 645, n=9)
523 Points ∼27% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=514)
1937 Points ∼100% +358%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
480 Points ∼27%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼24% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
681 Points ∼38% +42%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼100% +271%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
824 Points ∼46% +72%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
507 Points ∼28% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 714, n=9)
582 Points ∼33% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=517)
1673 Points ∼94% +249%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9674 Points ∼49%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14036 Points ∼72% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11287 Points ∼58% +17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼100% +102%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12096 Points ∼62% +25%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9680 Points ∼50% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15069, n=9)
11940 Points ∼61% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=675)
14216 Points ∼73% +47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10826 Points ∼43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10689 Points ∼42% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11335 Points ∼45% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼100% +133%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13615 Points ∼54% +26%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10728 Points ∼43% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 11349, n=9)
10461 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=673)
22187 Points ∼88% +105%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10547 Points ∼45%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11287 Points ∼48% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
11324 Points ∼48% +7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼100% +125%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13245 Points ∼56% +26%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10476 Points ∼44% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11921, n=9)
10713 Points ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=673)
17924 Points ∼76% +70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼50%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼52% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼52% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼94% +89%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼60% +21%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (17 - 20, n=8)
19 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼100% +101%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼50%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼52% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
31 fps ∼60% +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +100%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼65% +31%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (24 - 27, n=8)
26 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼54% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼45%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼46% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
10 fps ∼46% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼91% +104%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.9 fps ∼45% +1%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼45% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9.1 - 10, n=8)
9.64 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼100% +123%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼50%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼59% +18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53% +6%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (15 - 17, n=8)
16.5 fps ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼57% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼34%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼35% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
6.5 fps ∼36% +8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼73% +117%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36% +7%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼34% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.6 - 6.2, n=8)
5.85 fps ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼100% +198%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼38%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼42% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
14 fps ∼54% +40%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +160%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50% +30%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼38% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 11, n=8)
10.6 fps ∼41% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼64% +67%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼41%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼43% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.8 fps ∼48% +17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼91% +122%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼39% -5%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼43% +5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=8)
4.25 fps ∼43% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=188)
10 fps ∼100% +144%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼23% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1.4 fps ∼20% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% +100%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -14%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=8)
1.388 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=187)
7 fps ∼100% +400%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
7.9 fps ∼53% +16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +121%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼43% -6%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=8)
6.78 fps ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=192)
14.7 fps ∼98% +116%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼28% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4 fps ∼24% +8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼51% +127%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% 0%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=8)
3.78 fps ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=192)
16.5 fps ∼100% +346%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼23%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼24% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
4.1 fps ∼34% +46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼58% +154%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼30% +29%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼23% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2.1 - 2.9, n=8)
2.68 fps ∼22% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼100% +336%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps ∼30%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼36% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
8.7 fps ∼67% +123%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +233%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54% +79%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼29% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.8 - 5.1, n=8)
4.44 fps ∼34% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼84% +179%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
72320 Points ∼50%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
76398 Points ∼53% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
89089 Points ∼62% +23%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
140633 Points ∼98% +94%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
79792 Points ∼56% +10%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
73069 Points ∼51% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (71347 - 88242, n=9)
76135 Points ∼53% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143587 Points ∼100% +99%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼50% +6930%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1113 Points ∼80% +11030%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +13900%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
838 Points ∼60% +8280%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 835, n=8)
578 Points ∼41% +5680%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 9387, n=635)
773 Points ∼55% +7630%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼38%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼39% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
879 Points ∼42% +13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼91% +142%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1009 Points ∼49% +30%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼38% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (744 - 799, n=8)
769 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼100% +166%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
661 Points ∼21%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼32% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1991 Points ∼63% +201%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +380%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1335 Points ∼42% +102%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
730 Points ∼23% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (661 - 1247, n=8)
928 Points ∼29% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼48% +131%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2165 Points ∼43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼51% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
3164 Points ∼62% +46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +135%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2624 Points ∼52% +21%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2176 Points ∼43% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2165 - 2619, n=8)
2343 Points ∼46% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼59% +38%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
323 Points ∼13%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼43% +242%
Samsung Galaxy A10
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 2048
1576 Points ∼62% +388%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +691%
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1312 Points ∼51% +306%
LG Q60
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
331 Points ∼13% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (323 - 1166, n=8)
896 Points ∼35% +177%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼59% +365%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +124%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=531)
41.9 Points ∼82% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
37.917 Points ∼74% +66%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
27.076 Points ∼53% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (22.7 - 24.6, n=5)
23.3 Points ∼46% +2%
LG Q60 (Chrome 75)
23.142 Points ∼45% +1%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
22.823 Points ∼45%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼100% +158%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼87% +123%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
45 Points ∼67% +73%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
37 Points ∼55% +42%
LG Q60 (Chrome 75)
29 Points ∼43% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=7)
28.6 Points ∼43% +10%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
26 Points ∼39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
6921 Points ∼75% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼73% +60%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
4958 Points ∼54% +16%
LG Q60 (Chrome 75)
4272 Points ∼46% 0%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
4258 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=9)
4166 Points ∼45% -2%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼44% -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
12799.1 ms * ∼100%
LG Q60 (Chrome 75)
12708.5 ms * ∼99% +1%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼92% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=9)
11753 ms * ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=717)
10531 ms * ∼82% +18%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
9832.4 ms * ∼77% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A10 (Chrome 76)
5917.3 ms * ∼46% +54%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼36% +64%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

LG K50Wiko View 3Samsung Galaxy A10Xiaomi Mi A3Alcatel 3 2019LG Q60Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
12%
18%
202%
24%
8%
2%
12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
64.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
58.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
50.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=142)
-14%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=428)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
78.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
86.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
79.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
69.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=142)
-12%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=428)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
12.03
8.98
-25%
13.3
11%
117.4
876%
16.05
33%
13.94
16%
18.2 (0.75 - 77.3, n=185)
51%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=751)
85%
Random Read 4KB
52.12
55.23
6%
73.4
41%
126.9
143%
84.93
63%
53.92
3%
39 (3.59 - 117, n=185)
-25%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=751)
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
78.9
132.39
68%
101.7
29%
184
133%
87.21
11%
97.88
24%
93.9 (14.8 - 189, n=185)
19%
97.4 (2.99 - 590, n=751)
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
263.42
287.32
9%
296.4
13%
502.2
91%
305.8
16%
266.19
1%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=185)
-10%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=751)
4%
 34.9 °C34.7 °C34.4 °C 
 36 °C35.8 °C35.1 °C 
 37 °C37.3 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C
35.4 °C35.8 °C36 °C
35.2 °C36 °C36.4 °C
34.3 °C36.4 °C38.5 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Moyenne: 36 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  39.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.8452542.543.63134.237.94034.241.45039.241.3632934.18025.82910024.227.312524.429.616022.628.520021.428.325021.435.231519.941.940019.148.950019.457.163018.663.380017.870.2100019.174.8125017.873.1160019.272.620001871.1250017.468.9315016.967400016.966.2500016.971.1630016.970800017.266.11000017.2651250017.265.11600017.350.9SPL68.758.871.772.930.182.1N21.711.726.627.71.349.3median 18median 65.1Delta1.813.242.235.331.230.927.227.323.729.63139.622.728.122.830.924.42120.923.220.337.519.141.516.4471650.717.658.815.26014.661.915.471.314.875.215.276.115.675.914.878.214.678.614.379.614.678.314.770.915.373.815.369.814.966.115.354.915.63927.387.80.967.3median 15.3median 66.11.215.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG K50Wiko View 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG K50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Wiko View 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.16 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1 / 1.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 2.4 / 4.5 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Alcatel 3 2019
3500 mAh
LG Q60
3500 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-46%
-68%
-18%
-33%
-20%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.67
4%
0.7
-0%
0.8
-14%
0.63
10%
0.8
-14%
0.711 (0.57 - 1, n=9)
-2%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=781)
-26%
Idle Average *
1
1.73
-73%
1.6
-60%
2
-100%
1.66
-66%
1.3
-30%
1.589 (1 - 2.4, n=9)
-59%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=780)
-74%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.79
1%
2
-11%
3.3
-83%
1.73
4%
2.2
-22%
1.982 (1.51 - 2.9, n=9)
-10%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=781)
-13%
Load Average *
2.4
2.18
9%
5.4
-125%
4.1
-71%
3.17
-32%
4
-67%
3.05 (2.18 - 4, n=9)
-27%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=775)
-70%
Load Maximum *
4.5
3.43
24%
6
-33%
7.7
-71%
4.75
-6%
5.9
-31%
4.65 (3.43 - 5.9, n=9)
-3%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=775)
-32%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 42min
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A10
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Alcatel 3 2019
3500 mAh
LG Q60
3500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
822
995
21%
753
-8%
985
20%
923
12%
949
15%

Points positifs

+ grand écran
+ abordable
+ autonomie
+ double SIM
+ micro SD
+ emplacements micro SD et double SIM dédiés

Points négatifs

- GPS
- Wifi

Verdict

En test : le LG K50.
En test : le LG K50.

Le LG K50 possède un grand écran, de bons capteurs photo, et s’avère bien construit. Ses performances reflètent cependant son prix. Les applis du quotidien comme Facebook, Whatsapp ou le navigateur web par défaut tourneront bien, mais les jeux exigeants ne fonctionneront pas. L’appareil possède aussi une autonomie correcte.

Le LG K50 possède un excellent rapport qualité / prix dans la plupart des domaines. Mais son GPS et son Wifi gâchent un peu ses qualités.

Nous ne comprenons pas pourquoi LG a équipé le K50 d’un GPS et d’un module Wifi si mauvais. Si l’appareil prend en charge la norme 802.11ac rapide, il n’est pas à la hauteur de nos attentes. Et le chemin qu’il enregistre avec son GPS ressemble plus à un bol de spaghetti qu’à un tour à vélo. Le LG K50 est dans l’ensemble un smartphone à prix contenu réussi, mais seulement si l’on peut se passer de ces fonctionnalités.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

LG K50 - 10/21/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
83%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
0 / 70 → 
Poids
91%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
6 / 64 → 9%
Performances dans les applications
34 / 86 → 39%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Appareil photo
51%
Moyenne
71%
76%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du LG K50 : un grand smartphone à petit prix
Mike Wobker, 2019-10-25 (Update: 2019-10-25)