Notebookcheck

Test de la Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (i7-1065G7, Iris Plus G4, FHD+) : Core i7 et performances graphiques en hausse

Nino Ricchizzi, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots), 03/07/2020

Boost graphique. La Surface Pro 7 intègre le meilleur de ce que Microsoft peut proposer. Cependant la version Core i7 pourrait ne pas toujours valoir son surcoût. Dans ce test en particulier, la présence d’un processeur plus puissant rime surtout avec hausse des performances graphiques.

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Surface Pro Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Carte graphique
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Processeur: 1100 MHz, Mémoire: 1800 MHz
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4, double canal
Écran
12.3 pouces , 2736 x 1824 pixel, capacitif, Prise en charge native d'une utilisation avec un stylet, LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, brillant: oui, detachable screen
Carte mère
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disque dur
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, 256 Go 
Carte son
Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS
Connexions
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Connectique audio: prise jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, Brightness Sensor
Réseau
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.5 x 292 x 201
Batterie
45 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 5 MPix
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo 1,6 W, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
790 g, Alimentation: 281 g
Prix
1600 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
88 %
03/20
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
790 g8.5 mm12.3"2736x1824
88 %
11/19
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
775 g8.5 mm12.3"2736x1824
90 %
09/17
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640
1.1 kg8.5 mm12.3"2736x1824
86 %
10/19
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg13 mm13.4"1920x1200
88 %
01/20
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.2 kg16.9 mm13.3"1920x1080
En test : la Surface Pro avec Intel Core i7 en rouge.
En test : la Surface Pro avec Intel Core i7 en rouge.
Divers couleurs de claviers et deux couleurs de châssis sont disponibles.
Connectivité réduite et absence de Thunderbolt pour la Surface Pro 7.
Nouvelle finition noire élégante pour la Surface Pro.
Béquille flexible et ajustable.

Comparaison des tailles

296 mm 207 mm 13 mm 1.3 kg292.1 mm 201.4 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 790 g292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 775 g245 mm 175 mm 8.3 mm 523 g
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
164.2 MB/s ∼100% +125%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
144.6 MB/s ∼88% +98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼48% +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
73 MB/s ∼44%
Chuwi UBook Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
70.6 MB/s ∼43% -3%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.8 MB/s ∼41% -7%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=141)
62.5 MB/s ∼38% -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
53.8 MB/s ∼33% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247.7 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
187.5 MB/s ∼76% +116%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.9 MB/s ∼35%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
86.5 MB/s ∼35% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼35% -1%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 MB/s ∼34% -2%
Chuwi UBook Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
81.4 MB/s ∼33% -6%
Average of class Convertible
  (19.2 - 246, n=136)
77.4 MB/s ∼31% -11%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1291 (min: 1212, max: 1379) MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
836 (min: 743, max: 888) MBit/s ∼65%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
640 MBit/s ∼50% -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼46% -29%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s ∼45% -31%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 1420, n=158)
508 MBit/s ∼39% -39%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼39% -40%
Chuwi UBook Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
360 MBit/s ∼28% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1374 (min: 720, max: 1484) MBit/s ∼100% +117%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
634 (min: 561, max: 705) MBit/s ∼46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼41% -12%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
527 MBit/s ∼38% -17%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 1380, n=158)
508 MBit/s ∼37% -20%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s ∼35% -25%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
356 MBit/s ∼26% -44%
Chuwi UBook Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
344 MBit/s ∼25% -46%
428
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
LG Philips LP123WQ112604
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 440 cd/m² Moyenne: 421.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1359:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.18 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 3.49
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Chuwi UBook Pro
BOE TV123WAM-ND0, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Response Times
2846%
292%
14%
2901%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (19, 21)
34.8 (16.8, 18)
13%
47.6 (23.2, 24.4)
-19%
30.8 (14.8, 16)
23%
43 (21, 22)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16, 12)
26.4 (13.2, 13.2)
6%
29.2 (16, 13.2)
-4%
26.8 (15.6, 11.2)
4%
25 (13, 12)
11%
PWM Frequency
250 (50)
21550 (24)
8520%
2500 (25)
900%
22000 (50)
8700%
Screen
-92%
-16%
-90%
-58%
Brightness middle
435
480.4
10%
549.8
26%
867.6
99%
484
11%
Brightness
422
485
15%
520
23%
818
94%
473
12%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
86
-4%
83
-8%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.48
-50%
0.39
-22%
0.78
-144%
0.33
-3%
Contrast
1359
1001
-26%
1410
4%
1112
-18%
1467
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.18
5
-324%
2.12
-80%
4.64
-293%
4.29
-264%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.27
7.72
-240%
3.66
-61%
9.22
-306%
6.46
-185%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.49
2.44
30%
1.37
61%
2.31
34%
1.34
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.12
5.9
-427%
2.6
-132%
6.1
-445%
4.3
-284%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.38 92%
2.3 96%
2.22 99%
2.51 88%
CCT
6502 100%
7805 83%
6884 94%
7346 88%
7315 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60.3
1%
65.4
9%
59
-2%
62
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
93.2
-3%
99.7
4%
93.7
-2%
95
-1%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
1377% / 538%
138% / 50%
-38% / -74%
1422% / 576%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 21 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 250 Hz ≤ 50 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 50 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17077 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø592 (555.54-783.03)
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Core i5-1035G4: Ø518 (495.42-684.65)
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø553 (544.51-599.88)
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø550 (504.6-640.68)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100% +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
184 Points ∼97% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
184 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (149 - 190, n=15)
178 Points ∼94% -3%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
174 Points ∼92% -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Intel Core i5-1035G4
172 Points ∼91% -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 197, n=318)
108 Points ∼57% -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
830 Points ∼100% +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
783 Points ∼94%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
733 Points ∼88% -6%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (521 - 830, n=16)
690 Points ∼83% -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Intel Core i5-1035G4
644 Points ∼78% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35, max: 409.45) Points ∼49% -48%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 836, n=327)
313 Points ∼38% -60%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
68.84 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
783 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
184 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5160 Points ∼100% +36%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3998 Points ∼77% +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3920 Points ∼76% +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3784 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
3784 Points ∼73% 0%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
3684 Points ∼71% -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
3315 Points ∼64% -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
3014 Points ∼58% -20%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=116)
2532 Points ∼49% -33%
Productivity
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
7275 Points ∼100% +8%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
7179 Points ∼99% +7%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
7051 Points ∼97% +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6730 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
6730 Points ∼93% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
6678 Points ∼92% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
6665 Points ∼92% -1%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6000 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7254, n=118)
5350 Points ∼74% -21%
Essentials
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
9678 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
9664 Points ∼100% +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9536 Points ∼99% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
8879 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
8879 Points ∼92% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
8847 Points ∼91% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
8076 Points ∼83% -9%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7554 Points ∼78% -15%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 10546, n=118)
7129 Points ∼74% -20%
Score
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
4677 Points ∼100% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4644 Points ∼99% +6%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
4522 Points ∼97% +4%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4417 Points ∼94% +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4367 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
4367 Points ∼93% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
4163 Points ∼89% -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
3909 Points ∼84% -10%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4677, n=119)
3244 Points ∼69% -26%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
5227 Points ∼100% +52%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
5086 Points ∼97% +48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4799 Points ∼92% +40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
4639 Points ∼89% +35%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4544 Points ∼87% +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4431 Points ∼85% +29%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5366, n=244)
3785 Points ∼72% +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3440 Points ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
3440 Points ∼66% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4095 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3982 Points ∼97% +9%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
3911 Points ∼96% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3783 Points ∼92% +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3660 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
3660 Points ∼89% 0%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3601 Points ∼88% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
3537 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=293)
2830 Points ∼69% -23%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼18% -80%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3660 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3440 points
Aide
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-16%
-39%
-1%
Write 4K
131.3
118.5
-10%
131.55
0%
83.23
-37%
128 (125 - 131, n=2)
-3%
Read 4K
52.4
54.06
3%
43.34
-17%
43.84
-16%
53.7 (52.4 - 54.9, n=2)
2%
Write Seq
1613
1166
-28%
905.24
-44%
636.4
-61%
1417 (1220 - 1613, n=2)
-12%
Read Seq
1613
1676
4%
984.58
-39%
899.7
-44%
1652 (1613 - 1690, n=2)
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
411.6
330.5
-20%
421.59
2%
192.9
-53%
380 (348 - 412, n=2)
-8%
Read 4K Q32T1
415.6
393.1
-5%
498.94
20%
247.36
-40%
420 (416 - 424, n=2)
1%
Write Seq Q32T1
2340.1
1569
-33%
969.5
-59%
861.1
-63%
1955 (1570 - 2340, n=2)
-16%
Read Seq Q32T1
1567.5
2390
52%
1670.3
7%
1615
3%
1973 (1568 - 2378, n=2)
26%
Write 4K Q8T8
410.9
411
0%
Read 4K Q8T8
1032.8
1033
0%
AS SSD
-31%
-275%
-60%
-11%
Copy Game MB/s
990.94
922.99
-7%
582
-41%
676.35
-32%
1063 (991 - 1136, n=2)
7%
Copy Program MB/s
454.72
405.97
-11%
386
-15%
143.11
-69%
529 (455 - 604, n=2)
16%
Copy ISO MB/s
1159.65
1176.98
1%
1036
-11%
984.55
-15%
1176 (1160 - 1192, n=2)
1%
Score Total
2826
2157
-24%
1774
-37%
1225
-57%
2556 (2285 - 2826, n=2)
-10%
Score Write
927
475
-49%
52
-94%
280
-70%
707 (487 - 927, n=2)
-24%
Score Read
1288
1133
-12%
1164
-10%
644
-50%
1251 (1213 - 1288, n=2)
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.221
0.697
-215%
7.6
-3339%
0.3
-36%
0.42 (0.221 - 0.619, n=2)
-90%
Access Time Read *
0.069
0.066
4%
0.04
42%
0.213
-209%
0.076 (0.069 - 0.083, n=2)
-10%
4K-64 Write
702.63
294.65
-58%
34
-95%
171.3
-76%
498 (293 - 703, n=2)
-29%
4K-64 Read
1047.57
923.75
-12%
1015
-3%
494.14
-53%
1016 (985 - 1048, n=2)
-3%
4K Write
154.08
109.36
-29%
0.2
-100%
68.95
-55%
133 (112 - 154, n=2)
-14%
4K Read
52.34
50.7
-3%
41
-22%
34.42
-34%
52.3 (52.3 - 52.3, n=2)
0%
Seq Write
703.42
713.9
1%
171
-76%
393.6
-44%
761 (703 - 818, n=2)
8%
Seq Read
1880.78
1589.92
-15%
1070
-43%
1154.2
-39%
1818 (1756 - 1881, n=2)
-3%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-18% / -21%
-146% / -181%
-50% / -52%
-6% / -7%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Sequential Read: 1696 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1234 MB/s
512K Read: 797.7 MB/s
512K Write: 1016 MB/s
4K Read: 55.06 MB/s
4K Write: 131.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 406.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 318.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
4614 Points ∼100% +7%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4594 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4512 Points ∼98% +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4297 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
  (3228 - 4297, n=2)
3763 Points ∼82% -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G4
3228 Points ∼70% -25%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
2493 Points ∼54% -42%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=343)
1336 Points ∼29% -69%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points ∼27% -71%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
1105 Points ∼100% +56%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
833 Points ∼75% +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
708 Points ∼64%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
685 Points ∼62% -3%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
  (619 - 708, n=2)
664 Points ∼60% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G4
619 Points ∼56% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (85 - 1682, n=46)
505 Points ∼46% -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
454 Points ∼41% -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
3580 Points ∼100% +18%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
3144 Points ∼88% +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
3026 Points ∼85%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
2874 Points ∼80% -5%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
  (2210 - 3026, n=2)
2618 Points ∼73% -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
1418 Points ∼40% -53%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=253)
1062 Points ∼30% -65%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
819 Points ∼23% -73%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
18881 Points ∼100% +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
17872 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
17872 Points ∼95% 0%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
17712 Points ∼94% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
11264 Points ∼60% -37%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=303)
6973 Points ∼37% -61%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
6602 Points ∼35% -63%
3DMark 11 Performance
4504 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14315 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2833 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
793 points
Aide
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
60.22 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
58.1 fps ∼96% -4%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
47.3 fps ∼79% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
42.9 fps ∼71% -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
33.7 fps ∼56% -44%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
17.5 fps ∼29% -71%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
72.84 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
68.6 fps ∼94% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
50.8 fps ∼70% -30%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
47.9 fps ∼66% -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
40.9 fps ∼56% -44%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
22.4 fps ∼31% -69%
Rocket League
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
44.7 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
33.8 fps ∼76% -24%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
29.7 fps ∼66% -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
29.3 (min: 13, max: 40) fps ∼66% -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
20.3 fps ∼45% -55%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
67.5 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
62.6 fps ∼93% -7%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
44 fps ∼65% -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
42.6 (min: 30, max: 55) fps ∼63% -37%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
29.8 fps ∼44% -56%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
33 fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
27 fps ∼82% -18%
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx
21 fps ∼64% -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
18 fps ∼55% -45%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
16 fps ∼48% -52%

Légende

 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G
 
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
 
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Intel Core i7-7660U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
 
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
 
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202AH
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 112.5 72.84 60.22 21.96 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 49.16 30 15.97 12.56 fps
Rocket League (2017) 95.7 67.5 44.7 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 33 14 13 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
31.4 / 33.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.932.43234.530.92529.331.231.633.729.331333532.433.3334029.430.829.731.629.45028.334.328.63028.36326.629.72726.726.68025.128.22526.225.110029.224.424.924.729.212524.724.824.624.624.716023.923.822.724.223.920022.422.822.122.522.425022.122.32220.622.131521.521.220.420.921.54002221.119.819.92250021.420.519.319.321.46302119.81918.5218002320.318.518.523100023.219.718.117.823.2125022.319.417.817.822.3160023.11917.917.823.1200022.31917.617.522.3250021.618.817.517.621.6315023.21917.817.823.2400020.118.517.817.920.1500019.618.6181819.6630019.418.618.21819.4800018.918.718.318.118.91000018.618.518.218.218.61250018.518.618.118.218.51600018.418.517.91818.4SPL33.731.430.330.333.7N21.61.41.42median 22median 19.4median 18.2median 18.2median 22Delta1.21.31.21.21.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMicrosoft Surface Pro 7
 37 °C40.1 °C40 °C 
 34 °C38.6 °C38.9 °C 
 34.6 °C39.4 °C37.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Moyenne: 37.7 °C
38.3 °C41 °C39.6 °C
37.8 °C39.6 °C37 °C
35.3 °C35.7 °C34.8 °C
Maximum: 41 °C
Moyenne: 37.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  36.1 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket / Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.6 °C / -19.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.834.533.82533.833.733.8313133.3314028.331.628.35029.33029.36327.526.727.58029.326.229.310036.524.736.512544.924.644.916049.424.249.420050.422.550.425044.720.644.731544.720.944.740055.319.955.350055.419.355.463060.618.560.680065.218.565.2100061.817.861.8125059.117.859.1160061.417.861.4200060.217.560.2250059.317.659.3315056.517.856.5400058.817.958.85000591859630050.81850.8800051.818.151.81000054.218.254.21250039.718.239.71600033.41833.4SPL71.430.371.4N28.31.428.3median 55.3median 18.2median 55.3Delta6.31.26.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Pro 7Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.22 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 4.4 / 8.7 / 9.6 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 44 / 61 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
17%
0%
-1%
26%
-1%
19%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.2
27%
4.2
5%
4.5
-2%
2.6
41%
4.45 (4.4 - 4.5, n=2)
-1%
4.62 (1 - 23, n=394)
-5%
Idle Average *
8.7
8.7
-0%
10.1
-16%
9.2
-6%
5.3
39%
8.95 (8.7 - 9.2, n=2)
-3%
7.78 (1.3 - 32.3, n=394)
11%
Idle Maximum *
9.6
10.4
-8%
14
-46%
9.6
-0%
7
27%
9.6 (9.6 - 9.6, n=2)
-0%
9.31 (1.8 - 61, n=394)
3%
Load Average *
44
29.2
34%
37.4
15%
42
5%
43.1
2%
43 (42 - 44, n=2)
2%
26.9 (1.4 - 94, n=392)
39%
Load Maximum *
61
40.8
33%
34
44%
63.5
-4%
49
20%
62.3 (61 - 63.5, n=2)
-2%
32.5 (6.8 - 118, n=393)
47%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.1
43.1

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
11h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 46min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
6h 43min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 55min
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4
1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Autonomie de la batterie
32%
11%
-8%
8%
Reader / Idle
690
1336
94%
779 (117 - 2223, n=297)
13%
H.264
403
614
52%
457 (206 - 1070, n=122)
13%
WiFi v1.3
586
597
2%
489
-17%
537
-8%
458 (153 - 1010, n=270)
-22%
Load
115
116
1%
112
-3%
145 (49 - 677, n=296)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra
115
180 (115 - 230, n=3)

Points positifs

+ performances graphiques, par rapport à la version i5
+ Wifi 6 par défaut
+ autonomie
+ silencieux malgré le refroidissement actif
+ charge USB C

Points négatifs

- performances de l'i7
- absence de Thunderbolt 3
- absence de WWAN et de GPS
En test : la Microsoft Surface Pro 7 avec processeur i7 et 16 Go de RAM.
En test : la Microsoft Surface Pro 7 avec processeur i7 et 16 Go de RAM.

Après notre test de la version i5 et 8 Go de la Microsoft Surface Pro 7, nous avons pu tester la version plus puissante, et avons vite constaté que celle-ci ne se différenciait pas beaucoup de son petit frère plus abordable. Et ce, surtout en ce qui concerne le niveau de performances du processeur lors de plus longues sollicitations. Les performances graphiques sont en revanche significativement améliorées. Et, cerise sur le gâteau, ni les températures réduites, ni l’autonomie, n’ont été sacrifiées.

La question demeure : cette version i7 vaut-elle le coup ?

La Surface Pro 7 équipée d’un Intel Core i7 est conçue pour les utilisateurs exigeants qui ont besoin d’un peu plus de performances, en particulier graphiques.

Comme nous l’avons constaté dans nos tests, ce ne sont pas les performances du processeur qui permettent à la version i7 de la Surface Pro de sortir du lot, mais bien les performances graphiques, où l’investissement supplémentaire est le plus rentabilisé. Pour plus de détails sur la série Surface, merci de voir nos tests précédents.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 - 02/20/2020 v7
Nino Ricchizzi

Châssis
90 / 98 → 91%
Clavier
87%
Dispositif de pointage
92%
Connectivité
44 / 75 → 59%
Poids
78 / 20-75 → 100%
Autonomie
78%
Écran
90%
Performances en jeu
50 / 78 → 65%
Performances dans les applications
87 / 85 → 100%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
94%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Appareil photo
71 / 85 → 83%
Moyenne
79%
88%
Convertible - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de la Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (i7-1065G7, Iris Plus G4, FHD+) : Core i7 et performances graphiques en hausse
Nino Ricchizzi, 2020-03- 7 (Update: 2020-03- 7)