Notebookcheck

Test de l'Asus ZenBook Duo UX481 (i7-10510U, MX250, FHD) : comme l'Apple Touch Bar, mais en mieux

Deux écrans, un portable. Asus veut montrer qu’il y a d’autres façons d’innover qu’en cherchant à faire le portable le plus fin possible. L’écran ScreenPad Plus est pratique, et même irremplaçable dans certains cas, mais possède quelques défauts ergonomiques.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...
, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL (ZenBook Duo UX481 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 Mo, Processeur: 937 MHz, Mémoire: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 445.87, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, 1333.3 MHz, 16-20-20-45, double canal
Écran
14.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, capacitif 10 points, Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, CMN14D5, 60 Hz
Carte mère
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 Go 
Carte son
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD
Réseau
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19 x 323 x 223
Batterie
70 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Appareil photo primaire: 0.9 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Harman Kardon, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, McAfee LiveSafe, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.8 kg, Alimentation: 329 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
82.7 %
05/20
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg19 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.2 %
03/20
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.3 kg16 mm14.00"3840x2160
85 %
09/19
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620
1.2 kg12 mm14.00"3840x2160
84 %
03/20
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg14.5 mm13.50"2256x1504
81.2 %
02/20
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10
1.4 kg16 mm14.00"1920x1080
323 mm 223 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg324 mm 212 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.4 mm 1.2 kg319 mm 215 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg320 mm 199 mm 12 mm 1.2 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte micro SD, prise jack, USB A 3.1 Gen 1.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte micro SD, prise jack, USB A 3.1 Gen 1.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
A l'arrière : aucune connectivité.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen. 2 Type-A, USB C 3.1 Gen 2.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen. 2 Type-A, USB C 3.1 Gen 2.
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
148.9 MB/s ∼100% +89%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
146.3 MB/s ∼98% +86%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.8 MB/s ∼53%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.4 MB/s ∼18% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
187.3 MB/s ∼100% +126%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
176.5 MB/s ∼94% +113%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
82.9 MB/s ∼44%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.1 MB/s ∼20% -55%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (736min - 1523max) MBit/s ∼87%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1166 (1012min - 1299max) MBit/s ∼71% -19%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s ∼63% -28%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1379 (858min - 1529max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1130 (1072min - 1174max) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
ColorChecker
2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL: 8.99 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 17.51 ∆E
267.2
cd/m²
290.9
cd/m²
282.2
cd/m²
272.9
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
288.9
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
295.2
cd/m²
289.9
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 284.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: 717:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.01 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.48% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Tianma XM, IPS, 13.90, 3000x2000
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
B140ZAN01.3, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160
Display
-3%
-3%
16%
15%
Display P3 Coverage
67.1
66.7
-1%
65.95
-2%
87.53
30%
82.97
24%
sRGB Coverage
99.48
92.26
-7%
95.22
-4%
99.66
0%
99.68
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.89
67.48
-2%
67.62
-2%
81.1
18%
83.06
21%
Response Times
-39%
-15%
-54%
-61%
-59%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.2 ?(15.6, 15.6)
36 ?(19, 17)
-15%
40.4 ?(19.2, 21.2)
-29%
57.2 ?(30, 27.2)
-83%
49.2 ?(22, 27.2)
-58%
55 ?(27, 28)
-76%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8)
26 ?(15, 11)
-2%
25.6 ?(11.6, 14)
-0%
32 ?(17.2, 14.8)
-25%
32.2 ?(19.2, 13.2)
-26%
36 ?(22, 14)
-41%
PWM Frequency
24750 ?(29)
44 ?(20)
-100%
201.6 ?(99)
-99%
Screen
-124%
-34%
-57%
-103%
16%
Brightness middle
301
253
-16%
442.7
47%
594.5
98%
532
77%
567
88%
Brightness
285
245
-14%
428
50%
536
88%
513
80%
516
81%
Brightness Distribution
89
78
-12%
84
-6%
83
-7%
90
1%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.225
46%
0.31
26%
0.43
-2%
0.41
2%
0.445
-6%
Contrast
717
1124
57%
1428
99%
1383
93%
1298
81%
1274
78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.01
8.89
-780%
2.24
-122%
4.87
-382%
6.88
-581%
1.55
-53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.42
4.56
-33%
7.19
-110%
7.9
-131%
12.65
-270%
5.14
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.97
4.9
-405%
1.11
-14%
2.83
-192%
2.52
-160%
1.24
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
6.33
-188%
9.7
-341%
6.7
-205%
10.5
-377%
1.48
33%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.52 87%
1.42 155%
2.091 105%
1.98 111%
2.19 100%
CCT
6605 98%
6745 96%
6227 104%
6891 94%
7394 88%
6741 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.2
60
-5%
61.6
-3%
72
14%
74.1
17%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
91
-9%
95
-5%
100
1%
99.7
0%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-55% / -87%
-17% / -26%
-32% / -43%
-50% / -75%
-22% / 2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
25.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14.8 ms hausse
↘ 10.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (23.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
31.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 15.6 ms hausse
↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (37.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 24750 Hz ≤ 29 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 24750 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 29 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 24750 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 20848 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 3846000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

 
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø546 (533.24-766.64)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø669 (651.9-718.51)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø717 (684.67-772.41)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø729 (708.72-835.15)
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø431 (399.28-488)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
2410 Points ∼100% +64%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1883 Points ∼78% +28%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points ∼72% +18%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
1645 Points ∼68% +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
1630 Points ∼68% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
1499 Points ∼62% +2%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1468 Points ∼61%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (1015 - 1897, n=37)
1411 Points ∼59% -4%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
1138 Points ∼47% -22%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
1038 Points ∼43% -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
458 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
444 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
441 Points ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
439 Points ∼95% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (362 - 497, n=36)
436 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points ∼91% -5%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
383 Points ∼83% -13%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
370 Points ∼80% -16%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
334 Points ∼73% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
181 Points ∼100% +2%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
180 Points ∼99% +1%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
180 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
178 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (113 - 202, n=41)
178 Points ∼98% 0%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points ∼96% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
172 Points ∼95% -3%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
156 Points ∼86% -12%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
146 Points ∼81% -18%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
135 Points ∼75% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
1051 Points ∼100% +37%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points ∼76% +4%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
766.64 (533.24min - 766.64max) Points ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
750 Points ∼71% -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
736 Points ∼70% -4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
683 Points ∼65% -11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
672 Points ∼64% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (482 - 856, n=44)
667 Points ∼63% -13%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
496 (406.64min - 496.34max) Points ∼47% -35%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174
Intel Core i7-8550U
494 Points ∼47% -36%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
1039 Seconds * ∼100% -34%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (628 - 1051, n=30)
799 Seconds * ∼77% -3%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
776 Seconds * ∼75%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
771 Seconds * ∼74% +1%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
585 Seconds * ∼56% +25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4774 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3747 - 4981, n=30)
4587 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
4425 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4252 MIPS ∼89% -11%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
3885 MIPS ∼81% -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
27115 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
20557 MIPS ∼76%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
19168 MIPS ∼71% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (12196 - 21298, n=30)
17693 MIPS ∼65% -14%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
13812 MIPS ∼51% -33%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1262 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (977 - 1287, n=30)
1200 Points ∼95% -5%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4079 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (2474 - 4484, n=30)
3692 Points ∼91% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
6.032 fps ∼100% +23%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.9 fps ∼81%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7
4.632 fps ∼77% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3.41 - 6.04, n=30)
4.63 fps ∼77% -6%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U
3.51 fps ∼58% -28%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
72.9 s * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (50.7 - 77.8, n=26)
59.6 s * ∼82% +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.81 sec * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (0.637 - 0.81, n=27)
0.68 sec * ∼84% +16%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
99.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
178 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
766.64 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Score
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5150 Points ∼59% +21%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4246 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3861 - 5409, n=11)
4243 Points ∼48% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4219 Points ∼48% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3870 Points ∼44% -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3851 Points ∼44% -9%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3445 Points ∼39% -19%
Essentials
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9300 Points ∼81%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8892 Points ∼77% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (8021 - 9764, n=11)
8892 Points ∼77% -4%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8785 Points ∼76% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8390 Points ∼73% -10%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
7685 Points ∼67% -17%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7083 Points ∼62% -24%
Productivity
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7614 Points ∼68%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (6625 - 7972, n=11)
7331 Points ∼66% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7051 Points ∼63% -7%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6754 Points ∼61% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6674 Points ∼60% -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
5823 Points ∼52% -24%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5727 Points ∼51% -25%
Digital Content Creation
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6248 Points ∼40% +113%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3466 Points ∼22% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
3251 Points ∼21% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2621 - 5547, n=11)
3225 Points ∼21% +10%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
2935 Points ∼19%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2810 Points ∼18% -4%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2735 Points ∼18% -7%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
3747 Points ∼60%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3604 Points ∼57% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3214 - 3958, n=8)
3594 Points ∼57% -4%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3511 Points ∼56% -6%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3478 Points ∼55% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
3182 Points ∼51% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3147 Points ∼50% -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5266 Points ∼74%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (4599 - 5443, n=8)
5026 Points ∼71% -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
4842 Points ∼68% -8%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4422 Points ∼62% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4396 Points ∼62% -17%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4339 Points ∼61% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4209 Points ∼59% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3747 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5266 points
PCMark 10 Score
4246 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
1812.3 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
0%
3%
14%
74%
Seq Read
1236.5
1417.21
15%
2415.81
95%
1786.24
44%
2299.87
86%
Seq Write
1068.74
781.17
-27%
1169.65
9%
1258.8
18%
2051.42
92%
4K Read
52.12
37.03
-29%
48.33
-7%
45.86
-12%
46.23
-11%
4K Write
134.67
80.08
-41%
103.13
-23%
147.92
10%
84.63
-37%
4K-64 Read
585.39
739.73
26%
1039.05
77%
885.4
51%
1551.81
165%
4K-64 Write
853.7
747.86
-12%
399.62
-53%
949.77
11%
1788.99
110%
Access Time Read *
0.05
0.047
6%
0.058
-16%
0.058
-16%
0.049
2%
Access Time Write *
0.117
0.045
62%
0.036
69%
0.074
37%
0.045
62%
Score Read
761
918
21%
1329
75%
1110
46%
1828
140%
Score Write
1095
906
-17%
620
-43%
1224
12%
2079
90%
Score Total
2255
2270
1%
2575
14%
2885
28%
4831
114%
Copy ISO MB/s
1714.35
739.44
-57%
1384.11
-19%
Copy Program MB/s
511.32
312.26
-39%
525.29
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1186.92
486.26
-59%
1008.36
-15%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-17%
24%
20%
Write 4K
140.7
118.8
-16%
116.5
-17%
151.5
8%
163.8
16%
Read 4K
55.61
41.62
-25%
42.18
-24%
45.83
-18%
48.6
-13%
Write Seq
1415
795.7
-44%
1079
-24%
2060
46%
2269
60%
Read Seq
1516
1101
-27%
1030
-32%
1973
30%
1963
29%
Write 4K Q32T1
474.5
234.7
-51%
225.7
-52%
489.8
3%
289.8
-39%
Read 4K Q32T1
403.4
313.8
-22%
302.9
-25%
386.2
-4%
373.6
-7%
Write Seq Q32T1
1796
842.3
-53%
1174
-35%
2703
51%
2395
33%
Read Seq Q32T1
1913
1645
-14%
3394
77%
3376
76%
3479
82%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-16% / -13%
-7% / -4%
19% / 18%
47% / 51%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1913 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1796 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 403.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 474.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1516 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1415 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 140.7 MB/s
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
79420 Points ∼39% +298%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U
48573 Points ∼24% +143%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U
27059 Points ∼13% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (13805 - 23863, n=25)
21491 Points ∼11% +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
20784 Points ∼10% +4%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
19952 Points ∼10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
18633 Points ∼9% -7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
16268 Points ∼8% -18%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U
12306 Points ∼6% -38%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
10970 Points ∼22% +269%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U
7784 Points ∼15% +162%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U
5616 Points ∼11% +89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2939 - 3885, n=29)
3531 Points ∼7% +19%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
2999 Points ∼6% +1%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
2973 Points ∼6% 0%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
2972 Points ∼6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
2874 Points ∼6% -3%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U
2174 Points ∼4% -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
3510 Points ∼18% +295%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U
2883 Points ∼15% +225%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U
1634 Points ∼8% +84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (881 - 1169, n=22)
1070 Points ∼5% +20%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
888 Points ∼4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
862 Points ∼4% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
852 Points ∼4% -4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
825 Points ∼4% -7%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U
626 Points ∼3% -30%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
13871 Points ∼23% +284%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U
11119 Points ∼18% +208%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U
7291 Points ∼12% +102%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4630 Points ∼8% +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3585 - 4942, n=29)
4404 Points ∼7% +22%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
4165 Points ∼7% +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
3613 Points ∼6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3560 Points ∼6% -1%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U
2992 Points ∼5% -17%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
8788 Points ∼33% +121%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U
8406 Points ∼32% +112%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U
7112 Points ∼27% +79%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3532 - 4638, n=29)
4250 Points ∼16% +7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4163 Points ∼16% +5%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-10510U
3973 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3707 Points ∼14% -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U
3247 Points ∼12% -18%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U
2648 Points ∼10% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
3991 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12710 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2758 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
995 points
Aide
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
103.8 (92.3min) fps ∼100% +85%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
101.7 fps ∼98% +82%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87.5 (76.4min) fps ∼84% +56%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Intel Core i7-10710U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
64.4 (55.3min) fps ∼62% +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
56 (50.6min) fps ∼54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (7.8 - 67.5, n=20)
53 fps ∼51% -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
30.2 (28.1min) fps ∼29% -46%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
16.9 (15.9min) fps ∼16% -70%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
232.2 fps ∼100% +298%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
172.2 fps ∼74% +195%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
169.4 fps ∼73% +191%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
156.1 fps ∼67% +168%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
146 (109min) fps ∼63% +150%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
144.6 fps ∼62% +148%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
100.5 fps ∼43% +72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (47.4 - 70, n=24)
60.8 fps ∼26% +4%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
58.3 fps ∼25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
56.4 fps ∼24% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
53.8 fps ∼23% -8%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
52.7 fps ∼23% -10%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
50.7 (17min - 59max) fps ∼22% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
49 fps ∼21% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.7 fps ∼9% -64%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19.7 fps ∼8% -66%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.1 fps ∼7% -71%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
168.2 fps ∼100% +398%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
122.3 fps ∼73% +262%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
116.6 fps ∼69% +245%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
99 (75min) fps ∼59% +193%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
93.6 fps ∼56% +177%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
87.2 fps ∼52% +158%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
57.6 fps ∼34% +70%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
36.8 fps ∼22% +9%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
36.3 fps ∼22% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (30 - 40, n=27)
35.3 fps ∼21% +4%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
33.8 fps ∼20%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
33.5 (29min - 39max) fps ∼20% -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
31 fps ∼18% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
11 fps ∼7% -67%
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø33.2 (31-35)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 58.3 33.8 18 9.8 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 114 102 62.3 56 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 64.8 45.5 42.5 fps
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Noise
1%
-3%
-7%
-5%
off / environment *
28.3
29.8
-5%
27.9
1%
30.3
-7%
30.7
-8%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
28
1%
27.9
1%
30.3
-7%
30.7
-8%
Idle Average *
28.3
28
1%
27.9
1%
30.3
-7%
30.7
-8%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
28
1%
27.9
1%
30.3
-7%
30.7
-8%
Load Average *
39.1
36.8
6%
36.2
7%
40.2
-3%
38.8
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.1
45
-15%
Load Maximum *
39.1
39
-0%
45.2
-16%
43.5
-11%
39.3
-1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
39.1 / 39.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
 35 °C38.4 °C36.8 °C 
 35.6 °C36.6 °C35 °C 
 28 °C27.6 °C27.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Moyenne: 33.4 °C
41.2 °C48 °C41.6 °C
36.4 °C34.6 °C35.6 °C
32.2 °C33.6 °C33 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Moyenne: 37.4 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  51 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.342.140.3253839.8383138.938.138.94039.937.639.95036.438.336.46336.239.736.28038.134.838.110039.633.939.612547.234.747.216055.933.755.920051.335.151.325058.531.558.531562.231.962.240063.631.263.650066.130.366.16306829.86880066.729.466.7100070.828.970.8125071.728.871.716006828.768200067.328.667.3250066.428.366.4315063.128.563.14000652865500061.22861.2630060.92860.9800060.527.960.5100006127.9611250059.827.959.81600056.727.756.7SPL78.740.978.7N44.54.144.5median 62.2median 28.8median 62.2Delta5.11.95.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook Duo UX481FLApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.27 / 1.07 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.5 / 10 / 11 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 53 / 63.6 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00
Power Consumption
17%
-1%
-4%
-26%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
3.6
-3%
3.5
-0%
3.5
-0%
5.2
-49%
5.2
-49%
Idle Average *
10
7.2
28%
8.9
11%
10.8
-8%
12.2
-22%
10.2
-2%
Idle Maximum *
11
10.8
2%
12.3
-12%
12.5
-14%
14.3
-30%
11.9
-8%
Load Average *
53
38
28%
54.2
-2%
47.2
11%
67
-26%
42.1
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.6
42.4
-19%
Load Maximum *
63.6
45.2
29%
52.1
18%
68.8
-8%
67
-5%
53.6
16%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
22h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 31min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 40min
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 52 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
-30%
-16%
5%
-46%
-54%
Reader / Idle
1323
1068
-19%
1243
-6%
596
-55%
506
-62%
WiFi v1.3
571
404
-29%
557
-2%
598
5%
351
-39%
299
-48%
Load
220
125
-43%
133
-40%
125
-43%
103
-53%

Points positifs

+ calibrage de l'écran principal, couverture sRVB à 100 %
+ deuxième écran incroyablement utile pour le multitâche
+ silencieux en cas de sollicitations faibles et moyennes
+ autonomie, grosse batterie 70 Wh
+ touches nettes et silencieuses
+ format portable (14 pouces)
+ rigidité et élégance du châssis
+ lecteur micro SD

Points négatifs

- temps nécessaire pour s'adapter au clavier à l'avant, difficile de bien taper sans une grande table
- performances du processeur, Turbo Boost
- écran secondaire avec plus de reflets et de problèmes d'angles de vision
- espace colorimétrique de l'écran secondaire
- plus lourd et épais que les autres 14 pouces
- absence de Thunderbolt 3 ou de DisplayPort
- RAM soudée
En test : l'Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL. Modèle de test fourni par Asus.
En test : l'Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL. Modèle de test fourni par Asus.

Comme n’importe quel utilisateur peut en attester, avoir deux écrans plutôt qu’un peut vraiment améliorer la productivité, et le ZenBook Duo ne fait que confirmer cela. Il est difficile de revenir à un seul écran une fois que l’on est habitué à l’espace permis par deux écrans, et c’est là l’avantage principal sur lequel Asus compte avec le ZenBook Duo.

Mais sur un portable, il faudra accepter des compromis. Premièrement, le poids est le principal défaut du portable, qui est de plusieurs centaines de grammes plus lourd qu’un ZenBook 14 classique. Deuxièmement, les couleurs sur le second écran ne sont pas aussi vives que celles de l’écran principal, certifié Pantone. Troisièmement, l’angle de vision élevé entre l’utilisateur et le deuxième écran accentue les reflets et réduit la luminosité apparente, sauf en cas de luminosité ambiante optimale. Quatrièmement, le positionnement inhabituel du clavier nécessite un apprentissage, surtout si l’espace est réduit. Et cinquièmement, les écrans ne sont pas très bons pour les déplacements, malgré le format compact 14 pouces et l’autonomie spécialement bonne. L’OLED aurait potentiellement corrigé tous ces problèmes, mais une telle approche aurait significativement augmenté les prix.

Il y a quelques autres fonctionnalités absentes, que nous aimerions avoir sur les prochaines versions. Un cache de webcam physique et la possibilité de charge via USB C par exemple, qui ne sont pas disponibles ici alors qu’ils sont maintenant communs parmi les autres PC portables haut de gammes.

Si les défaut énumérés ne vous gênent ou que vous pensez pouvoir vous y faire, alors le ZenBook Duo et son deuxième écran seront un délice pour le multitâche.

L’Asus ZenBook Duo est à son avantage dans un environnement à l’éclairage contrôlé et avec une souris, afin de de maximiser la visibilité et l’ergonomie du deuxième écran. Les nomades qui ont besoin de beaucoup de place à l’écran seront séduits par le ZenBook Duo. Mais si vous avez de la place sur votre bureau, alors un ZenBook 14 classique et un bon écran externe seront encore plus efficaces.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL - 05/01/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Châssis
85 / 98 → 87%
Clavier
78%
Dispositif de pointage
73%
Connectivité
53 / 80 → 66%
Poids
65 / 20-72 → 87%