Notebookcheck

Test du Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : un écran de rêve à prix contenu

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 11/15/2019

Ecran étonnant. Le Redmi Note 8 est un nouveau smartphone d’entrée de gamme de Xiaomi, mais l’un de ceux qui redéfinissent les normes d’écran pour les appareils à moins de 200 €. Celui de notre Note 8 est lumineux, bien contrasté, et même adapté à ceux qui sont sensibles au scintillement MLI. Le Redmi Note 8 n’a cependant pas tout bon, comme nos tests vont le montrer.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Redmi Note Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
Écran
6.3 pouces 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPP, capacitif, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 Go 
, , 108 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrarouge, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 256 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, USB C, OTG, LED de notification, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900 MHz. 3G : B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G : B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.3 x 158.3 x 75.3
Batterie
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix f/1,8, 1 / 2", 0.8 μm. 8 MP, f/2,2, 13 mm, 1 / 4", 1,12 μm. 2 MP, f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75 μm. 2 MP, f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,75 μm. Appareil photo2 API: Full
Appareil photo secondaire: 13 MPix f/2,0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, chargeur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, coque de protection, MiUI, 12 Mois Garantie, DAS : corps - 1,089 W/kg, tête - 0,191 W/kg. DRM Widevine : L1 (EU) L3 (Chine), fanless
Poids
190 g, Alimentation: 51 g
Prix
200 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device overview

NoteDateModèlePoidsDriveTailleRésolutionBest Price
79%11/19Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
665, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78%09/19Xiaomi Mi A3
665, Adreno 610
173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
81%06/19Nokia 4.2
439, Adreno 505
161 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
76%07/19Samsung Galaxy A20e
7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
141 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.8"1560x720
76%10/19LG K50
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
170 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
71%10/19Gigaset GS195
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322
180 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.18"2246x1080
85%07/19Honor 20 Lite
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
164 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Comparaison des tailles

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 170 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g156.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.4 mm 180 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 164 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=456)
230 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Gigaset GS195
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 (min: 43, max: 53) MBit/s ∼15% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=456)
218 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼13% -87%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼12% -88%
Gigaset GS195
GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25.7 (min: 18, max: 33) MBit/s ∼8% -92%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : vue générale.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : boucle.
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 : boucle.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker Photo
26.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
38 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 42.48 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 74.73 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
14.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: 7.95 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 16.92 ∆E
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Mire de test.
Mire de test.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Mire de test à 1 lux.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - Détail de la mire de test.
624
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 658 cd/m² Moyenne: 642.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1215:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
LG K50
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Gigaset GS195
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Honor 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
-191%
-114%
-160%
-89%
-155%
-92%
8%
Brightness middle
656
348
-47%
445
-32%
475
-28%
489
-25%
487
-26%
455
-31%
593
-10%
Brightness
643
355
-45%
424
-34%
473
-26%
453
-30%
507
-21%
456
-29%
587
-9%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
91
-4%
93
-2%
85
-11%
84
-12%
94
-1%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.54
0.26
52%
0.35
35%
0.42
22%
0.55
-2%
0.58
-7%
Contrast
1215
1712
41%
1357
12%
1164
-4%
885
-27%
784
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.1
5.86
-433%
5.9
-436%
6.8
-518%
4.75
-332%
5.67
-415%
4.43
-303%
0.9
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.4
15.6
-550%
9.3
-288%
13.4
-458%
7.75
-223%
13.54
-464%
6.81
-184%
2
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.6
-64%
6.8
-209%
8.7
-295%
4.6
-109%
8.2
-273%
5.4
-145%
1.5
32%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.232 99%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.164 102%
2.27 97%
2.248 98%
2.27 97%
CCT
6263 104%
7051 92%
8443 77%
9385 69%
7510 87%
7569 86%
7336 89%
6548 99%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9347 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
23.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9.6 ms hausse
↘ 14 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
49.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 23.6 ms hausse
↘ 26 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
363 Points ∼18%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
272 Points ∼14% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 370, n=2)
367 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=35)
2004 Points ∼100% +452%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1327 Points ∼67%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
809 Points ∼41% -39%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
832 Points ∼42% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1327 - 1379, n=2)
1353 Points ∼68% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=46)
1979 Points ∼100% +49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
314 Points ∼55%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
177 Points ∼31% -44%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
155 Points ∼27% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (314 - 315, n=2)
315 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=46)
572 Points ∼100% +82%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5122 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼66% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼41% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼42% -36%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2680 Points ∼34% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2631 Points ∼34% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼100% +52%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼87% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5122 - 5144, n=2)
5133 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=327)
4688 Points ∼60% -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5366 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼82% +6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼54% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3480 Points ∼51% -35%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5335 Points ∼78% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼85% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5366 - 5663, n=2)
5515 Points ∼80% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=386)
4731 Points ∼69% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1495 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼35% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼48% -19%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
773 Points ∼31% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1537 Points ∼61% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼100% +69%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼71% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1495 - 1536, n=2)
1516 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=386)
1430 Points ∼57% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼61% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼70% -18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4052 Points ∼54% -38%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
4644 Points ∼62% -29%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5829 Points ∼77% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6396 - 6534, n=3)
6476 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=396)
5356 Points ∼71% -18%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼88% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼69% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼76% -7%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4635 Points ∼51% -38%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
6601 Points ∼73% -11%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7388 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼92% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7446 - 8186, n=3)
7872 Points ∼87% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=563)
5817 Points ∼64% -22%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼83% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼72% -10%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼84% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2250 - 2300, n=3)
2273 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=74)
2691 Points ∼97% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼32% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼18% -45%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1220 Points ∼44% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼68% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (898 - 908, n=3)
902 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=74)
2800 Points ∼100% +212%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼41% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼19% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼23% -42%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1365 Points ∼54% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼81% +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1036 - 1049, n=3)
1042 Points ∼41% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=74)
2545 Points ∼100% +146%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼74% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼50% -29%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼29% -59%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1401 Points ∼43% -39%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2109 Points ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼100% +41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2298 - 2387, n=3)
2342 Points ∼72% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=404)
1997 Points ∼62% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼45% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼19% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼20% -55%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
434 Points ∼20% -56%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
383 Points ∼18% -61%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
829 Points ∼38% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼85% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 987, n=3)
983 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=404)
1815 Points ∼83% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼21% -57%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
457 Points ∼19% -60%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
958 Points ∼41% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼100% +107%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼84% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1126 - 1135, n=3)
1132 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=405)
1684 Points ∼72% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼71% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼46% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼49% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼28% -60%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1407 Points ∼43% -40%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2124 Points ∼64% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼76% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2343 - 2393, n=3)
2361 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4725, n=432)
1898 Points ∼58% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼50% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼21% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
701 Points ∼21% -58%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
644 Points ∼19% -61%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1233 Points ∼37% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼100% +99%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼86% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1668 - 1674, n=3)
1671 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=432)
2406 Points ∼73% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼54% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼24% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
742 Points ∼22% -58%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
732 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1360 Points ∼41% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼100% +86%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1778 - 1790, n=3)
1785 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=432)
2018 Points ∼61% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼77% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼49% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼51% -32%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
897 Points ∼28% -63%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1371 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2378 Points ∼74% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼100% +34%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼78% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2408 - 2477, n=3)
2436 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=484)
1903 Points ∼59% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼46% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼18% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼22% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
257 Points ∼13% -73%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
288 Points ∼14% -70%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
710 Points ∼35% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼85% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (931 - 979, n=3)
959 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=484)
1503 Points ∼75% +55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼49% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼20% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼24% -53%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
305 Points ∼14% -73%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
349 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
841 Points ∼38% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼100% +97%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼84% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1081 - 1128, n=3)
1108 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=485)
1446 Points ∼66% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼76% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼51% -31%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
911 Points ∼28% -62%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1362 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2441 Points ∼75% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2378 - 2471, n=3)
2434 Points ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=524)
1759 Points ∼54% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼52% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼20% -60%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
423 Points ∼13% -74%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
503 Points ∼16% -69%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
667 Points ∼21% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼100% +98%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼87% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1607 - 1651, n=3)
1631 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=523)
1959 Points ∼62% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼56% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼25% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼23% -57%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
480 Points ∼15% -72%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
585 Points ∼18% -66%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
795 Points ∼25% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼100% +85%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼84% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1728 - 1782, n=3)
1758 Points ∼55% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=526)
1689 Points ∼53% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼96% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼59% -41%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9674 Points ∼48% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼95% -5%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (18698 - 20354, n=3)
19535 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=684)
14281 Points ∼70% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼54% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼29% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼25% -54%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10826 Points ∼23% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼85% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (24654 - 25219, n=3)
24955 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=682)
22374 Points ∼48% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼67% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼37% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼33% -51%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10547 Points ∼30% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼100% +51%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼81% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (23253 - 23693, n=3)
23493 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=682)
18053 Points ∼51% -23%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼47% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼30% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼26% -44%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼25% -47%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼51% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼100% +114%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼84% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (36 - 36, n=3)
36 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=703)
38.4 fps ∼50% +7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼90% +58%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼59% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼53% -6%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼45% -21%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼62% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +76%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼98% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (33 - 52, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼68% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=712)
28.3 fps ∼49% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼53% +5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼29% -42%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼26% -48%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼55% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼84% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=608)
22.2 fps ∼58% +17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼59% +18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼50% 0%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼56% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼91% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17 - 34, n=3)
23 fps ∼68% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=617)
19.6 fps ∼58% +15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼48% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼24% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼24% -50%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼22% -54%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼52% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼85% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=3)
13 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=473)
18.1 fps ∼67% +39%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +117%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼54% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼38% -17%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼50% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼92% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼85% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (12 - 26, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼64% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=475)
17 fps ∼65% +42%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼89% +225%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼47% +71%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼40% +46%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1.9 fps ∼19% -32%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼41% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼91% +232%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼80% +193%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.8 - 9.1, n=3)
5.47 fps ∼54% +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=196)
10.2 fps ∼100% +264%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% -36%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -73%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% -68%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% -68%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
1.2 fps ∼17% -73%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼86% +39%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼71% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.8 - 4.4, n=3)
3.33 fps ∼47% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=195)
7.06 fps ∼100% +60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼52% +8%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% -6%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3 fps ∼20% -58%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼43% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼87% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.2 - 15, n=3)
9.93 fps ∼66% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=200)
14.9 fps ∼99% +107%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼50% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼24% -51%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% -54%
Gigaset GS195
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048
3.2 fps ∼19% -60%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼42% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼96% +98%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼84% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (8.1 - 8.4, n=3)
8.23 fps ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=200)
16.7 fps ∼100% +106%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼44% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼22% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼26% -39%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼18% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +132%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼81% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=3)
7.07 fps ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=398)
12.3 fps ∼77% +78%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼66% +41%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps ∼30% -36%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼52% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼92% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.1 - 13, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼66% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=402)
11.1 fps ∼85% +82%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼10%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11.99 fps ∼14% +46%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.41 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼20% +105%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼17% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (8.24 - 12, n=2)
10.1 fps ∼12% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=66)
85.4 fps ∼100% +936%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10.74 fps ∼17% +62%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.62 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼22% +104%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼19% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.65 - 10.7, n=2)
8.7 fps ∼14% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=59)
62.8 fps ∼100% +844%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.16 fps ∼4% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼16% +108%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼13% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
7.44 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=56)
97.3 fps ∼100% +1208%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1092 Score ∼49% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
552 Score ∼25% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼90% +76%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼75% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1092 - 1134, n=2)
1113 Score ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=62)
2227 Score ∼100% +96%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +49%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼60% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼79% +18%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼73% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼79% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼77% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=3)
1088 Points ∼78% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=640)
763 Points ∼55% -19%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼53% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼28% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼25% -53%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼22% -59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1462 Points ∼41% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼100% +89%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼87% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1916, n=3)
1894 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=640)
2094 Points ∼59% +11%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼68% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼28% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼43% -28%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
661 Points ∼14% -76%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3096 Points ∼67% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼100% +65%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼63% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2808 - 3174, n=3)
2939 Points ∼63% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=640)
1546 Points ∼33% -45%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼75% +2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼40% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼50% -33%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2165 Points ∼32% -57%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5238 Points ∼77% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼84% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5000 - 5089, n=3)
5032 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=640)
3022 Points ∼45% -40%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼77% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼39% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼48% -29%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
323 Points ∼10% -86%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2220 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼82% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2240 - 2556, n=3)
2350 Points ∼71% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=640)
1515 Points ∼46% -33%
AnTuTu v8
UX (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
27535 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (27535 - 27705, n=3)
27592 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7553 - 78191, n=14)
36536 Points ∼100% +33%
MEM (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
38271 Points ∼83% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (37857 - 38271, n=3)
38133 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 92659, n=14)
45871 Points ∼100% +20%
GPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33000 Points ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (33000 - 33527, n=3)
33176 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 199051, n=14)
74515 Points ∼100% +126%
CPU (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
70889 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (70133 - 70889, n=3)
70637 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40810 - 145684, n=14)
84660 Points ∼100% +19%
Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (169222 - 169695, n=3)
169537 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (95354 - 501784, n=14)
241583 Points ∼100% +42%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=112)
36.1 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30.5 - 30.7, n=3)
30.6 Points ∼85% 0%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
30.008 Points ∼83% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼60% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼44% -48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
51.061 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (49.8 - 51, n=3)
50.4 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=537)
42.2 Points ∼83% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
39.076 Points ∼77% -22%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
27.086 Points ∼53% -46%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
22.823 Points ∼45% -55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=100)
39.8 runs/min ∼100% +29%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
33 runs/min ∼83% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (29.5 - 30.8, n=3)
30.3 runs/min ∼76% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)
29.5 runs/min ∼74% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼54% -30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼46% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=170)
67.1 Points ∼100% +29%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
62 Points ∼92% +19%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼86% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (51 - 58, n=3)
53.7 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼72% -8%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼57% -27%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
26 Points ∼39% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
9591 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (9107 - 9405, n=3)
9257 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=698)
6865 Points ∼72% -27%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼50% -49%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
4258 Points ∼44% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
12799.1 ms * ∼100% -181%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=723)
10475 ms * ∼82% -130%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼76% -114%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼43% -22%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
4852.6 ms * ∼38% -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼36% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4504 - 4584, n=3)
4550 ms * ∼36% -0%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Mi A3Nokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eLG K50Gigaset GS195Honor 20 LiteAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
26%
-41%
-16%
-28%
-46%
-3%
2%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
25%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
27%
64.6 (52.8 - 73.5, n=15)
22%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=436)
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
77 (71.6 - 85.9, n=15)
7%
67.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=436)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
91.23
117.4
29%
4.31
-95%
13.18
-86%
12.03
-87%
4.97
-95%
73.1
-20%
46.5 (8.48 - 169, n=17)
-49%
22.8 (0.14 - 250, n=760)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
84.76
126.9
50%
17.51
-79%
79.76
-6%
52.12
-39%
28.43
-66%
38.7
-54%
76.6 (20.7 - 191, n=17)
-10%
48.3 (1.59 - 196, n=760)
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
160.53
184
15%
18.17
-89%
103.57
-35%
78.9
-51%
29.42
-82%
200.9
25%
192 (90 - 522, n=17)
20%
99.1 (2.99 - 590, n=760)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
297.65
502.2
69%
220.39
-26%
300.36
1%
263.42
-12%
107.25
-64%
288.1
-3%
353 (144 - 1418, n=17)
19%
278 (12.1 - 1504, n=760)
-7%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (20-26)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø14.8 (9-23)
; Standard / low: Ø20.3 (12-31)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.6 (49-60)
 33.9 °C36.2 °C33.5 °C 
 35.3 °C35 °C33.8 °C 
 35.2 °C34.7 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Moyenne: 34.6 °C
32.6 °C32.5 °C35.3 °C
32.3 °C32.4 °C34.8 °C
31.8 °C33.3 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 35.3 °C
Moyenne: 33.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.927.52529.130.53125.431.94029.427.55039.432.86327.327.78021.622.81002421.812520.724.516019.941.52001847.725016.854.531516.26140015.963.950013.568.563013.970.880012.972.110001472.4125014.774.6160014.175.3200014.275.3250014.575.1315015.474.2400014.978.9500014.878.463001575.4800015.377.81000015.378.81250015.6711600015.556.5SPL2787.7N0.973.3median 15.3median 72.1Delta1.310.339.939.243.842.636.539.336.145.245.141.335.740.826.73528.533.926.535.424.843.724.648.42452.822.556.42060.920.465.619.869.119.369.923.875.517.875.11878.217.376.916.675.515.77215.764.815.769.415.673.915.772.615.767.515.756.615.753.168.730.785.722.21.562.6median 18median 67.54.39.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Mi A3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.77 / 1.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.42 / 6.14 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
LG K50
3500 mAh
Gigaset GS195
4000 mAh
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-34%
-1%
14%
18%
-48%
-36%
-35%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.8
-29%
0.74
-19%
0.66
-6%
0.7
-13%
1
-61%
0.9
-45%
1.04 (0.62 - 1.7, n=3)
-68%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=788)
-42%
Idle Average *
1.77
2
-13%
1.9
-7%
1.63
8%
1
44%
2.1
-19%
1.6
10%
2.02 (1.77 - 2.3, n=3)
-14%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=787)
2%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
3.3
-83%
2.21
-23%
1.67
7%
1.8
-0%
3.2
-78%
2.2
-22%
2.87 (1.8 - 3.5, n=3)
-59%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=788)
-13%
Load Average *
3.42
4.1
-20%
3.04
11%
2.77
19%
2.4
30%
4.7
-37%
6
-75%
4.07 (3.42 - 4.7, n=3)
-19%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=782)
-19%
Load Maximum *
6.14
7.7
-25%
4.15
32%
3.66
40%