Notebookcheck

PowerVR SGX540

PowerVR SGX540

Le PowerVR SGX540 est une puce graphique intégrée dans certains SoC ARM que l'on retrouve dans des Smartphones et autres tablettes. Généralement cadencée à 200 MHz, elle offre 4 unités de calcul pixel shader et 2 unités vertex shader. La carte prend en charge les librairies OpenGL ES 2.0 et a été annoncée au grand public en Novembre 2007.

FabricantPowerVR
PowerVR SGX500 Gamme
SGX554MP4 32
SGX543MP4 16
SGX543MP3 12
SGX543MP2 8
SGX545 4/2 cores @ 0.53 GHz
SGX544MP2 8/4 cores @ 0.3 - 0.53 GHz
SGX544 4/2 cores @ 0.38 GHz
SGX540 4/2 cores @ 0.2 GHz
SGX535 2/2 cores @ 0.2 GHz
SGX531 2/1 cores
SGX530 2/1 cores
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixelshader/Vertexshader
Fréquence du noyau interne200 MHz
Mémoire partagéenon
technologie45 nm
Date de présentation01.01.2008
CPU in SGX540GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Atom Z24801 x 2000 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Intel Atom Z24601 x 1300 MHz, 4? W400 MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK31682 x 1200 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Intel Atom Z24201 x 1200 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.400 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 738     moyenne: 1390     médian: 1390 (0%)     maximum: 2042 Points
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 6.4     moyenne: 6.9     médian: 6.8 (1%)     maximum: 7.6 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 9.4     moyenne: 10.2     médian: 10.2 (17%)     maximum: 11 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1 fps (0%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
2.7 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 846     moyenne: 1260     médian: 1462 (51%)     maximum: 1471 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 1311     moyenne: 2324     médian: 2477 (22%)     maximum: 3183 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 2951     moyenne: 3291     médian: 3291 (34%)     maximum: 3631 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 7.69     moyenne: 12     médian: 12.4 (20%)     maximum: 17.06 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 20.4     moyenne: 32.6     médian: 34.8 (52%)     maximum: 45.1 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
2581 Points (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
612 Points (1%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1406     moyenne: 1949     médian: 1799 (39%)     maximum: 2966 points
- Amplitude des valeurs obtenues dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
- Valeur moyenne obtenue dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Pour plus de jeux susceptibles d'être fluides avec cette carte graphique et obtenir une liste exhaustive de tous les jeux et cartes graphiques testés, consultez notre liste des jeux.

v1.16
log 14. 13:03:33

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 11 Jul 2021 12:10:44 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.053s ... 0.053s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.053s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.054s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.054s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.054s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.054s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.054s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 2609 +0.014s ... 0.068s

#17 got single benchmarks 2609 +0.014s ... 0.081s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.136s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.136s

#21 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.141s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.142s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.142s

Testés dans les ordinateurs portables : PowerVR SGX540 carte graphique

Amazon Kindle Fire 7": Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 7.00", 0.4 kg
  Critique » Critique du Kindle Fire 7" de chez Amazon

BlackBerry Playbook WiFi 16GB: Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 7.00", 0.4 kg
  Critique » Critique du BlackBerry Playbook WiFi 16Go

Motorola Xoom 2 MZ 607: Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 8.20", 0.4 kg
  Critique » Critique de la tablette Motorola Xoom 2 MZ607

Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1: Texas Instruments OMAP 4460, 7.00", 0.5 kg
  Critique » Courte critique de la Tablette Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1: Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 10.10", 0.6 kg
  Critique » Critique du Samsung 10.1" Galaxy Tab 2

Samsung Google Nexus S I9020: Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 / Exynos 3110, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Critique » Critique du Samsung Google Nexus S I9020/I9023

Amazon Kindle Fire 7": Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 7.00", 0.4 kg
  Autres tests » Amazon Kindle Fire 7"

Archos ArcBook: Rockchip RK3168, 10.10", 1.3 kg
  Autres tests » Archos ArcBook

Asus Fonepad: Intel Atom Z2420, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  Autres tests » Asus Fonepad

Asus Fonepad ME371MG: Intel Atom Z2420, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  Autres tests » Asus Fonepad ME371MG

Motorola RAZR i: Intel Atom Z2480, 4.30", 0.1 kg
  Autres tests » Motorola RAZR i

Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1: Texas Instruments OMAP 4460, 7.00", 0.5 kg
  Autres tests » Panasonic Toughpad JT-B1

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1: Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 10.10", 0.6 kg
  Autres tests » Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1")

Toshiba AT200: Texas Instruments OMAP 4430, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Autres tests » Toshiba AT200

Please share our article, every link counts!

Rang 3

A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx

Rang 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Mali-G72 MP3 *
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
Mali-G57 MP2 *

Rang 5

Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 512 *
Mali-T760 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
GeForce Tegra 4 *

Rang 6

Mali-T624
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX544MP2 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
GC7000UL
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Position approximative de la carte graphique