Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

La NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost est une combinaison d'une carte dédiée Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS ou 9200M GS avec une puce 9100M G en SLI (GeForceBoost avec Hybrid SLI).

A ne pas confondre avec les Geforce 9400M (que l'on trouve dans les MacBook de 2009). Mais les performances sont proches de la 9400M G.

Elle est plus rapide qu'une 9300M GS et support le changement dynamique de carte graphique.

GeForce 9400M Gamme
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 16 @ 0.45 GHz
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost 24 64 Bit
Pipelines24 - unifiés
Largeur du bus mémoire64 Bit
Mémoire partagéenon
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
technologie65 nm
Date de présentation03.06.2008

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
125 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
96 Points (0%)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
ATI Radeon HD 4225 17%
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 111%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU 106594%
0%
100%
- Amplitude des valeurs obtenues dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
- Valeur moyenne obtenue dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
* Plus les chiffres sont petits, plus les performances sont élevées

Pour plus de jeux susceptibles d'être fluides avec cette carte graphique et obtenir une liste exhaustive de tous les jeux et cartes graphiques testés, consultez notre liste des jeux.

v1.17
log 17. 06:27:17

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 14 May 2022 09:02:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.029s ... 0.029s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 920 +0.008s ... 0.037s

#8 got single benchmarks 920 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.045s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.051s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.056s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.058s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.064s

#42 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.065s

#43 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.065s

#44 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.066s

#45 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.067s

#46 return log +0s ... 0.067s

Testés dans les ordinateurs portables : NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost carte graphique

Dell Studio 14z: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200, 14.00", 2 kg
  Autres tests » Dell Studio 14z

Dell Studio S1440-022B: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200, 14.00", 2.5 kg
  Autres tests » Dell Studio S1440-022B

Please share our article, every link counts!

Rang 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *

Rang 2

A770M *
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
A730M *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
A550M *
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
A370M *
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *

Rang 3

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon R9 M485X
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P520
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Vega 9
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs *
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
Radeon 660M *
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M340
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Rang 4

Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Rang 5

* Position approximative de la carte graphique

Klaus Hinum, 2011-02-26 (Update: 2012-05-18)