Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

C'est une puce graphiqe pour station de travail terminale (optimisée pour les programmes CAD et 3D) avec DirectX 10 et un bon support OpenGL, basé sur la carte graphique GeForce 8700M GT. Elle est destinée aux créateurs de contenu numérique, ingénieurs, géologues et autres applications 3D professionelles. Des pilotes certifiés assurent la représentation correcte et plus rapide (comparé à la 8700M) des programmes professionels (CAD, CCD, logiciels de visualisation).

Quadro FX Gamme

Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Nom de codeNB8P-GLM
ArchitectureG8x
Pipelines32 - unifiés
Fréquence du noyau interne625 MHz
Fréquence des unités de calcul Shaders1250 MHz
Fréquence de la mémoire800 MHz
Largeur du bus mémoire128 Bit
Type de mémoireGDDR3
Quantité maximale possible de mémoire embarquée512 Mo
Mémoire partagéenon
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Consommation d'énergie50 Watt(s)
Nombre de transistors289 Million(s)
technologie80 nm
Caractéristiques PureVideo, video scaling, LCDs avec 1920x1200 pixels, PCI-Express, connexion pour sortie carte graphique externe.
Dimension de l'ordinateur portablede grandes dimensions (en remplacement d'un ordinateur de bureau)
Date de présentation01.06.2007
Informations Langage de texture CG, précision virgule flottante 32 bit, précision subpixel 12 bit, précision 128 bit du pipeline graphique, vertex et pixelshader programmables, interface PCI-E, FSAA avec grille activée, support multiécran nView, Technologie high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR), coupure 3D matérielle, antialiasing plein-écran
Lien redirigeant vers la page du fabricanthttp://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.html

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 27822     moyenne: 32843     médian: 35198 (37%)     maximum: 35509 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15060     moyenne: 16009     médian: 15915 (8%)     maximum: 17144 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Amplitude des valeurs obtenues dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
- Valeur moyenne obtenue dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
* Plus les chiffres sont petits, plus les performances sont élevées

Benchmarks de jeux

Les benchmarks qui suivent sont tirés de tests effectués dans nos critiques des ordinateurs portables. Les performances dépendent du type et de la quantité de mémoire graphique embaquée, mais aussi de sa fréquence, du processeur, des paramètres système, des pilotes et du système d'exploitation. Les résultats ne sont donc pas représentatifs de tous les appareils intégrant cette carte graphique. Pour plus de détails sur les résultats, cliquez sur le nombre d'images par seconde.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
Bas 1024x768
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps    + Comparer
Moyen 1024x768
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Comparer
Élevé 1024x768
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Comparer
» Jouable avec tous les ordinateurs portables testés avec les détails paramétrés sur Bas.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
67.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
25.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
57.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
21.9
16.4
High 1280x800
12.3
9.9
High 800x600
19.4
Medium 1680x1050
13.6
Low 1920x1200
23.5
Low 1920x1200
35.8
Medium 1920x1200
13.4
High 1920x1200
5.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
Bas 1024x768
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps    + Comparer
Moyen 1024x768
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps    + Comparer
Élevé 1024x768
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps    + Comparer
» Jouable avec la plupart des ordinateurs portables testés avec les détails paramétrés sur Bas.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
59.9
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
22.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
50.6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
19.4
15.7
High 1440x900
9.4
Medium 1680x1050
12.6
High 1920x1200
5.1
Medium 1920x1200
9.8
Low 1920x1200
31.6
19.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
11.9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
18.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
Moyen 1024x768
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Comparer
Élevé 1024x768
21 23 ~ 22 fps    + Comparer
» Jouable avec tous les ordinateurs portables testés avec les détails paramétrés sur Moyen.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
33
31
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
20
18
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
29
27
High 2xAF 2xAA 1440x900
18
14
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
24
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
12
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
Bas 640x480
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps    + Comparer
Moyen 800x600
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps    + Comparer
Élevé 1024x768
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps    + Comparer
» Jouable avec tous les ordinateurs portables testés avec les détails paramétrés sur Élevé.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
Bas 640x480
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps    + Comparer
Moyen 640x480
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps    + Comparer
Élevé 800x600
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps    + Comparer
Ultra 1024x768
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps    + Comparer
» Jouable avec tous les ordinateurs portables testés avec les détails paramétrés sur Ultra.

Pour plus de jeux susceptibles d'être fluides avec cette carte graphique et obtenir une liste exhaustive de tous les jeux et cartes graphiques testés, consultez notre liste des jeux.

v1.19
log 17. 20:33:07

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:17:38 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.321s ... 0.321s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.322s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.323s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.323s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.324s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.324s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.325s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.325s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.326s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.326s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.327s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.327s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.328s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.328s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.328s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.328s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.328s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.328s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.329s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.329s

#23 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.329s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.013s ... 0.341s

#25 got single benchmarks 183 +0.012s ... 0.354s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.354s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.355s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.355s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.36s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.366s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.366s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.366s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.371s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.378s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.378s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.378s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.378s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.044s ... 0.422s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.422s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.425s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.039s ... 0.464s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.467s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.042s ... 0.51s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.515s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.519s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.519s

#47 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.531s

#48 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.531s

#49 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.535s

#50 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.535s

#51 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.537s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.542s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.544s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.549s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.551s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.556s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.556s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.558s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.563s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.563s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.565s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.569s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.57s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.572s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.575s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.575s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.576s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.581s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.581s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.583s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.584s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.587s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.592s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.592s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.592s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.592s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.594s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.594s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.598s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.598s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.601s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.601s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.609s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.613s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.617s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.621s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.628s

#104 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.633s

#105 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.635s

#106 return log +0s ... 0.635s

Testés dans les ordinateurs portables : NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M carte graphique

 

Critique du HP Compaq 8710w

(Puissance au bureau)². Le HP Compaq série 8710 est particulièrement conçu pour les professionnels du graphisme et de la CAO. Equipé d'un processeur Intel Core ...
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | 17.10" | 3.4 kg

Dell Precision M6300: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300, 17.10", 3.8 kg
  Autres tests » Dell Precision M6300

HP Compaq 8710w: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500, 17.10", 3.4 kg
  Autres tests » HP Compaq 8710w

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170

Rang 1

Radeon RX 6750 XT
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *

Rang 2

M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
T550 Laptop GPU *

Rang 3

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon R9 M485X
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Quadro P520
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Vega 9
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs *
Vega 8
Vega 7 *
Radeon 660M *
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *

Rang 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Rang 5

* Position approximative de la carte graphique

> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > FAQ > Comparaison de cartes graphiques mobiles > NVidia > NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Klaus Hinum, 2008-04-29 (Update: 2012-05-18)